All the statistics in one place
Data open
Related report Memorial, media and congresses, cross-referenced
Memoria y Resistencia’s figures in one place: the cases we document, how the media talk and what the congresses do. Choose what to see, compare years or build your own chart. Behind every number there is a person with a name: learn their story in the memorial.
How are violence, the press and congresses related?
A single report with the Memorial, the Media Observatory and the Legislative observatory: how many people we lost, how the press told it and what congresses did in the same period.
- people in the Memorial · 2025 y 2026
- 127
- stories analyzed · average rating 94 out of 100
- 1,449
- proposals in favor introduced · in 34 congresses
- 494
- proposals passed in the period
- 132
- of the people have an analyzed article
- 91%
- statements against in the press · 6 in favor
- 11
What the data show
- For every 10 people in the Memorial in 2025 and 2026, congresses introduced 38.9 proposals in favor and passed 10.4.
- There were 13 proposals against these rights.
- 91% of the people in the Memorial have at least one analyzed article in the Media Observatory; 12 have none.
- Articles about Memorial cases score 96 out of 100, 3 points higher than the rest of the articles about the LGBTTTIQANB+ population (93).
- When reporting on a person in the Memorial, 11.0% of articles get their name or gender wrong (in the rest, 4.5%).
- In the coverage of trans women, travestis and muxes, 13.2% of articles get their name or gender wrong.
- In articles, legislators spoke 6 times in favor and 11 against (confirmed statements only).
- Only 0% of the proposals introduced in the period appear in the press with a statement by a legislator.
Month by month: violence, press and congresses
The bars are the people in the Memorial and the proposals introduced each month; the line, the analyzed articles (right-hand scale).
See the data table
| Month | People | Articles | Proposals | Approved | Statements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nov 2026 | 0 | 1,001 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| oct 2026 | 11 | 104 | 11 | 4 | 4 |
| sep 2026 | 5 | 26 | 15 | 4 | 0 |
| ago 2026 | 5 | 24 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| jul 2026 | 9 | 45 | 13 | 3 | 4 |
| jun 2026 | 7 | 37 | 31 | 11 | 10 |
| may 2026 | 5 | 23 | 21 | 5 | 0 |
| abr 2026 | 9 | 26 | 29 | 6 | 0 |
| mar 2026 | 9 | 17 | 27 | 29 | 0 |
| feb 2026 | 5 | 11 | 39 | 5 | 0 |
| ene 2026 | 3 | 9 | 14 | 3 | 0 |
| dic 2025 | 3 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 0 |
| nov 2025 | 6 | 11 | 25 | 7 | 0 |
| oct 2025 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 2 | 0 |
| sep 2025 | 3 | 9 | 26 | 3 | 0 |
| ago 2025 | 12 | 24 | 18 | 3 | 0 |
| jul 2025 | 4 | 14 | 21 | 4 | 0 |
| jun 2025 | 14 | 18 | 50 | 16 | 0 |
| may 2025 | 3 | 6 | 40 | 11 | 0 |
| abr 2025 | 0 | 2 | 46 | 3 | 0 |
| mar 2025 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 3 | 0 |
| feb 2025 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 0 |
| ene 2025 | 8 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
State by state
Where the cases happened, how much the press covered them and what that state’s congress did in the same period. Tap a state to see its profile.
People and proposals by state
| State | People | Per million per year | With an article | Coverage rating | Proposals in favor | Approved | Stalled | Against | Statements in favor / against | Signals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puebla | 16 | 1.32 | 13 (81%) | 96 | 46 | 11 | 26 | 0 | 2 / 11 | Signals against |
| Guerrero | 11 | 1.69 | 11 (100%) | 95 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Mexico City | 10 | 0.59 | 10 (100%) | 95 | 83 | 23 | 55 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| State of Mexico | 10 | 0.32 | 8 (80%) | 93 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 / 0 | |
| Chihuahua | 9 | 1.31 | 9 (100%) | 94 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Veracruz | 7 | 0.47 | 7 (100%) | 94 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 / 0 | |
| Jalisco | 7 | 0.46 | 7 (100%) | 96 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 / 0 | Signals against |
| Guanajuato | 6 | 0.53 | 5 (83%) | 99 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Morelos | 6 | 1.65 | 6 (100%) | 97 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 / 0 | Signals against |
| Michoacán | 5 | 0.57 | 5 (100%) | 98 | 19 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 0 / 0 | Signals against |
| Tabasco | 5 | 1.13 | 4 (80%) | 96 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Sinaloa | 4 | 0.72 | 4 (100%) | 96 | 17 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Oaxaca | 3 | 0.39 | 2 (67%) | 92 | 14 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Chiapas | 3 | 0.29 | 2 (67%) | 99 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 / 0 | Signals against |
| Nuevo León | 3 | 0.28 | 3 (100%) | 96 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 / 0 | Signals against |
| Baja California | 3 | 0.43 | 3 (100%) | 96 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Colima | 3 | 2.23 | 3 (100%) | 99 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Hidalgo | 2 | 0.35 | 1 (50%) | 97 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Tamaulipas | 2 | 0.31 | 1 (50%) | 100 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 / 0 | Signals against |
| Durango | 2 | 0.59 | 2 (100%) | 96 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Quintana Roo | 2 | 0.58 | 2 (100%) | 96 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Campeche | 2 | 1.17 | 2 (100%) | 89 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Baja California Sur | 1 | 0.68 | 1 (100%) | 98 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Coahuila | 1 | 0.17 | 0 (0%) | – | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 / 0 | No articles |
| Yucatán | 1 | 0.23 | 1 (100%) | 100 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Querétaro | 1 | 0.23 | 1 (100%) | 100 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Nayarit | 1 | 0.44 | 1 (100%) | 93 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Sonora | 1 | 0.18 | 1 (100%) | 99 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| San Luis Potosí | 0 | – | – | – | 11 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 / 0 | Signals against |
| Aguascalientes | 0 | – | – | – | 9 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Tlaxcala | 0 | – | – | – | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Zacatecas | 0 | – | – | – | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| Congress of the Union | 127 (whole country) | – | 115 | 96 | 115 | 29 | 73 | 1 | 0 / 0 |
Sin proposals It has cases in the Memorial and its congress introduced no proposal in favor in the period. No articles None of its cases has an analyzed article in the Media Observatory. Signals against Proposals against rights were introduced, or its legislators spoke out against more often than in favor (at least twice).
The Memorial in the press
Do the people in the Memorial have articles?
People in the period with at least one analyzed article among the sources of their case.
See the data table
| With at least one analyzed article | 115 |
|---|---|
| Without analyzed articles | 12 |
How the cases are told
Percentage of articles with each feature: those about a person in the Memorial (319) versus the rest of the articles in the period (1,131).
See the data table
| Trait | About cases | Rest |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 96 | 93 |
| Respectful (70 or more) | 98.1% | 97.4% |
| With a gender perspective | 40.4% | 17.5% |
| Sensationalist | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Get the name or gender wrong | 11.0% | 4.5% |
| Blame the victim | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| With aggressive language | 0.3% | 1.1% |
Coverage by gender identity of the people in the Memorial
| Identity | People | With an article | Articles | Average rating | Get their name or gender wrong |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trans women, travestis and muxes | 80 | 76 (95%) | 235 | 95 | 13.2% |
| Cis men | 38 | 33 (87%) | 91 | 97 | 7.7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 4 (80%) | 12 | 91 | 16.7% |
| Cis women | 2 | 1 (50%) | 4 | 100 | 0.0% |
| Non-binary people | 1 | 1 (100%) | 1 | 100 | 0.0% |
| Other identities | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 | – | – |
Congresses and the press, topic by topic
What is proposed, what is passed and what is said against
Proposals introduced in the period, passed in the period and statements against in the press, by topic.
See the data table
| Topic | In favor | Against | Approved | Statements in favor | Statements against | Little interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender identity of trans children and adolescents | 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Legal gender recognition | 100 | 5 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marriage equality and unions | 12 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ban on conversion therapies (SOGICE) | 22 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hate crimes and trans femicides | 35 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Non-discrimination based on orientation or identity | 225 | 1 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Diverse families, adoption and parentage | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Affirmative action and political representation | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Comprehensive health, HIV and trans care | 179 | 2 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What legislators say
Confirmed statements in articles from the period, 1 of them about a Memorial case.
See the data table
| In favor | 6 |
|---|---|
| Against | 11 |
| Little interest | 0 |
| Neutral or ambiguous | 3 |
Do the proposals reach the press?
Proposals introduced in the period with at least one statement by a legislator in an article.
- proposals echoed in the press
- 2
- of 507 introduced
- 0%
- legislators with statements against
- 5
- proposals in favor in the freezer
- 250
Figures for 2025 and 2026 (to date), calculated on November 5, 2026. Two figures moving together doesn’t mean one causes the other.
Go to the Memorial Go to the Media Observatory Go to the Legislative observatory
How to read these figures
This report cross-references three Memoria y Resistencia databases: the Memorial (LGBTTTIQANB+ people murdered, disappeared or attacked), the Media Observatory (articles about the LGBTTTIQANB+ population analyzed with the Analyzer) and the Legislative observatory (proposals in congresses and what legislators say in the press).
Only years with a complete database
A year appears here only when all three databases are complete for that year. Today they are 2025 and 2026, which correspond to the current legislature. Since 2025, monitoring has been daily and each new year is added automatically; earlier years are added when the team finishes completing their information. That way no comparison mixes years with gaps.
How the data are related
- People in the Memorial: public cases dated within the period (death, events or discovery).
- Coverage: a person has coverage if at least one of the sources of their case is an article analyzed by the Media Observatory (from any date).
- Articles: only articles about the LGBTTTIQANB+ population, rated and without counting copies, by publication date. The rating and features are the same ones published on each article.
- Proposals: bills, resolutions and statements of position introduced in the period; those passed are counted by the date the full chamber passed them or they were published. Proposals against rights are counted separately.
- Statements: only those confirmed by an official source or by two independent media outlets, by the article’s date.
- States: each case counts in the state where it happened and each proposal in the congress where it was introduced. The federal Congress is counted separately.
Limits
Two figures moving together doesn’t mean one causes the other. The Memorial is a community record with underreporting: a state with few cases may be a state where we document less. This year’s figures will grow.
Use the data
The charts and tables on this page are free: you can use them, download them as images and share them. The data are published under the license CC BY 4.0: cite Memoria y Resistencia.
- Create your account or sign in with it.
- Answer the starting questionnaire. With that you can already use the figures in JSON with your personal key.
- Request the CSV of the cases and tell us what you will use it for. When we authorize it, the link appears in My account.