Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Abogado transexual aparece muerto y envuelto en una cobija rosa en Hidalgo; era funcionario del GDF

SinEmbargo MX · published on June 8, 2013

The most important

What happened?

Bad news for the community

It reports a person's death.

Turing says this when he reads the note.

How did the media report it?

Good

The article is respectful overall, with some details to improve. One expression appears quoted or denounced and does not count.

What is worth changing

  1. It says lo identificaronMejor: trasladarla o la encontraron

El 84 es por how he wrote it, not because it's good news.

What Can I Do?

What they did well and what they did wrong Leer la nota completa en sinembargo.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-7KUW-JYPG

Preliminary analysis: Turing has not yet finished reviewing this note and will complete it as soon as possible.

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. What they did well and what they did wrong
  3. What to change and what is working well 1
  4. "It's true what he says."
  5. See a mistake?
  6. Find out more

The note, in summary

What they did well and what they did wrong

1 cosa que hizo mal · 2 que hizo bien

Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en SinEmbargo MX.

What you did well

  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population

and what they did wrong.

  • Name and gender

Qué dijo y cómo decirlo mejor

The phrases Turing highlighted

Citas breves de la nota de SinEmbargo MX, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.

SinEmbargo MX sinembargo.mx

Abogado transexual aparece muerto y envuelto en una cobija rosa en Hidalgo; era funcionario del GDF

abc Name and gender abc Quoted or analyzed (does not count)

… extraoficial, dada a conocer por la prensa, los hermanos del occiso lo identificaron1 el día de ayer y revelaron que el edredón donde estaba envuelto el …

Would you like to read the full article? Está en la página de SinEmbargo MX. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.

Leer en sinembargo.mx

What to change and what is working well

What needs to be changed and what is working well

1 por cambiar · 2 que hace bien

Cada señalamiento dice por qué lo marcamos y cómo decirlo mejor. Cómo se calculó el 84 está en Find out more.

Good

  • Inclusive language

The article is respectful overall, with some details to improve. One expression appears quoted or denounced and does not count.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2013 (date of publication) The terms of your era are explained, but not subtracted.

Analyzed with Turing v3.1 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 6
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 2 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 84 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Name and gender−6
  3. Gender and rights perspective+4
  4. Inclusive language+5
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−6
  6. It misgenders the person: it cannot be “Very good”−13
  7. Rating84

This article is a source for a case in the record. We check whether it names Gary Gómez Bastida with their name and gender, as stated in the record. The legal name is never shown.

Turing related it to what the site already knows

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • Experts1 time

What is worth changing

  1. Name and gender …por la prensa, los hermanos del occiso lo identificaron el día de ayer y revelaron que el edredón… See it in the text Why we flag it: Changing the gender of a trans person within the same article denies their identity. The CONAPRED Glossary (2016) and the guidelines for journalists call for always referring to the person with the gender they lived as, even when the article states that they were transferred, treated, or identified. The article names her as a trans woman and here it uses the masculine (“lo”, “-lo”). Write “trasladarla”, “la encontraron”. It says lo identificaronBetter saytrasladarlala encontraron

What the article quotes, denounces or attributes to other people

These expressions appear in textual quotations, as terms that the text examines or in words of other people that the note reports or points out as an offense. Naming them to report or denounce them is not using them, so they do not count in the rating.

  • Nombre y género · como término …dada a conocer por la prensa, los hermanos del occiso lo identificaron el día de ayer y…

What it does well

  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population

"It's true what he says."

Is what the note says true?

Turing lo está comparando

Turing compares the figures, laws, and cases it mentions with what we have documented. We don't say "false": if something doesn't add up, we show you the evidence.

Turing está comparando lo que afirma la nota con el Memorial, la sección Congresos y gobiernos y verificaciones publicadas…

See a mistake?

Correct Turing or request a review

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

One piece of information is incorrect

A person, a date, a figure, or a position that doesn't match. Write to us and we'll check it out.

Report a data point

I'm the middle child

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Find out more

Cómo se calculó el 84What remains and what is added, the Turing version, and whether an AI helped

This can be seen in “What to change and what is being done well.”

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-7KUW-JYPG, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-7KUW-JYPG

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 13, 2026, 22:15:41 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-7KUW-JYPG Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 13, 2026, 22:15:41 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy fe56f35e83f83395800dae905ebfcaa1c2faa9ddc5adeddc2bc92cea3ffe23d4

The link no longer opened: Turing read it from the Internet Archive copy.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

In the Legislatures and Governments sectionThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note

In the Memorial

This article is connected to stories we have already documented.

Note detailsMedio, fechas

Data

Published
June 8, 2013
Last analyzed
November 13, 2026
Turing
3.1 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.