Media Observatory · Tool
Analyze an article with Turing
Paste the link to an article, a post or a PDF. We tell you whether its language respects LGBTTTIQANB+ people and what could be written better.
2,247 articles analyzed from 766 media outlets and accounts · average rating 94 · used by 8 people
Turing 2.0
How Turing works
Two layers work together: our rules assign the rating and a Google AI reviews the doubtful cases. It all happens in a few seconds.
Video · 6 minutes
Meet Turing
The heart of Memoria y Resistencia: it connects the Memorial with the Media and Legislative observatories. It analyzes, verifies, classifies, monitors, evaluates, reports and learns.
Watch it on YouTube-
1 Paste the link
From an article, a blog, a PDF or a post on X, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook or Instagram. If it can’t be read, paste the text.
-
2 We read the text
We remove menus and ads. We separate what the outlet says from quotes, testimonies, footnotes and references.
3 Turing analyzesv2.0
169 reglas sobre nombre y género, términos que dañan, amarillismo, culpa a la víctima y discurso hostil. Se basan en el Protocolo de la Suprema Corte, CONAPRED, OMS y ONUSIDA.
It assigns the rating- Google Gemini
- OpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq
- Claude de Anthropic
Logos are trademarks of their owners; they only show which AI we use.
Only on doubtful expressions: it checks whether it is a quote, a criticism or the outlet’s own voice. That way we don’t punish those who denounce.
It can only reduce weightTuring compara las cifras, leyes y casos de la nota, y lo que dicen las organizaciones y personas legisladoras que cita, con el Memorial y el Observatorio Legislativo. Te enseña la evidencia.
No cambia la calificaciónEn una página aparte, solo con tu nota: la calificación, qué cambiar, cómo escribirlo mejor y lo que dice, verificado. Si la IA revisó algo, te decimos qué y por qué.
How does the media talk?
The Media Observatory has every article that has been analyzed, each outlet’s and account’s classification, the most used expressions and the articles outlets corrected.
How we rate
Every article starts with 100 points. We deduct for each harmful expression and add for what the article does well. We rely on the Protocolo OSIEGCS of the Supreme Court and on the journalist guides of LGBTTTIQANB+ organizations.
- 85Very good
- 70Good
- 50Fair
- 30Poor
- 0Bad
- Derogatory terms
- Insults or words that demean people because of their orientation, identity or gender expression.
- Name and gender
- Calling the person by a name or gender that isn’t theirs, or treating their identity as a disguise.
- Blames the victim
- Explanations that justify violence or stigmatize the victim.
- Sensationalism
- Adjectives and morbid details that seek to shock rather than inform.
- Hostile speech
- Expressions that present LGBTTTIQANB+ people as a threat, an illness or a sin.
- Imprecise terms
- Outdated or incorrect words that have a precise alternative.
- Gender and rights perspective
- Naming the person’s identity, bias-motivated violence, the demand for justice and those who support it.
- Inclusive language
- Naming all people (“la ciudadanía”, “las y los vecinos”) instead of the generic masculine.
It is an automatic tool. It can get irony wrong, as well as quotes the article criticizes or very short texts. Use it as a guide and always review the full text. Expressions inside a verbatim quote weigh less, and those the article rejects (“it was not a crime of passion”) do not deduct.
2026 Memoria y Resistencia, an initiative of Nodo Cívico. The analysis is done on our servers; its criteria and code are not free to use.