Skip to content

Analysis of the article

"Nosotros los de entonces"

A unified · published on August 25, 1990

The most important

¿Qué pasó?

Mala noticia para nuestros derechos

It quotes words against the community.

Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.

¿Cómo lo contó el medio?

Good

La nota es respetuosa en general, con algunos detalles por mejorar. 2 expresiones aparecen citadas o denunciadas y no cuentan.

What is worth changing

  1. It says mayatesIt’s an insult. Call the person by their name.
  2. It says putasIt’s a misogynistic slur. If it’s a quote, make clear that it’s an expression of hate.
  3. It says brutishIt aims for shock value. Describe the facts soberly.

El 80 es por cómo lo escribió, no porque sea buena noticia.

What Can I Do?

We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-A8R4-QKGE

Análisis preliminar: Turing aún no termina de revisar esta nota y la completará solo en cuanto pueda.

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. Qué hizo bien y qué hizo mal
  3. Qué cambiar y qué hace bien 3
  4. See a mistake?
  5. Find out more

La nota, en resumen

Qué hizo bien y qué hizo mal

Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en Proceso.

Lo que hizo bien

  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Remembers their family and networks

Lo que hizo mal

  • Términos despectivos · 2 veces
  • Sensationalism

Qué dijo y cómo decirlo mejor

Las frases que marcó Turing

Citas breves de la nota de Proceso, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.

A unified proceso.com.mx

"Nosotros los de entonces"

abc Derogatory term abc Sensationalism

… y bebimos contentísimos Wencho Mont hacía coreografías con putas2 (see point 2 in the analysis), locas, mayates1 (see entry 1 in the analysis), artistas y estudiantes, ¡mambo! y Pepe Limantour comparaba a …

… Sergio ni yo conocíamos entonces, pero nada elegante, y si un poco brutish3 (see point 3 in the analysis)

¿Quieres leer la nota completa? Está en la página de Proceso. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.

Leer en proceso.com.mx (opens in a new tab)

Qué cambiar y qué hace bien

Lo que conviene cambiar y lo que hace bien

Cada señalamiento dice por qué lo marcamos y cómo decirlo mejor. Cómo se calculó el 80 está en Find out more.

Good

  • Inclusive language

La nota es respetuosa en general, con algunos detalles por mejorar. 2 expresiones aparecen citadas o denunciadas y no cuentan.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 1990 (date of publication) The terms of your era are explained, but not subtracted.

Analyzed with Turing v3.0 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms Moderado · 2 señalamientos · resta 23
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism Mild · 1 pointing · subtraction 3
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 2 strengths
Inclusive language 67%

How to read this rating

  • It has a yellowish detail, shown below. They take points off, but they are not enough to call it a “sensationalist article”: that happens when sensationalism sets the tone of the whole article. In the statistics it counts among articles “with some sensationalist detail”.
How we arrived at 80 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Derogatory terms−23
  3. Sensationalism−3
  4. Gender and rights perspective+4
  5. Inclusive language+2
  6. Rating80

This article is a source for a case in the record. We check whether it names José Yves Limantour with their name and gender, as stated in the record. The legal name is never shown.

Turing related it to what the site already knows

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • Experts1 time

What is worth changing

  1. Derogatory terms …Mont hacía coreografías con putas, locas, mayates, artistas y estudiantes, ¡mambo! y Pepe… See it in the text It’s an insult. Call the person by their name.
  2. Derogatory terms …Wencho Mont hacía coreografías con putas, locas, mayates, artistas y estudiantes,… See it in the text It’s a misogynistic slur. If it’s a quote, make clear that it’s an expression of hate.
  3. Sensationalism …entonces, pero nada elegante, y si un poco brutish · Vino “El pequeño caso de Jorge… See it in the text It aims for shock value. Describe the facts soberly.

What the article quotes, denounces or attributes to other people

These expressions appear in textual quotations, as terms that the text examines or in words of other people that the note reports or points out as an offense. Naming them to report or denounce them is not using them, so they do not count in the rating.

  • Discurso hostil · como término …de capítulo y que haya las palabras más anormales en vez de las que se debe Más chiquero que…
  • Culpa a la víctima · como término …el Gato Escribimos el papel titular para [datos de una persona menor de edad] se estrenó la obra ya no querían…

What it does well

  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Remembers their family and networks

See a mistake?

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Un dato está mal

Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.

Avisar de un dato

Soy del medio

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Find out more

Cómo se calculó el 80Lo que resta y lo que suma, la versión de Turing y si ayudó una IA

Se ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-A8R4-QKGE, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-A8R4-QKGE

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 13, 2026, 17:30:29 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-A8R4-QKGE Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 13, 2026, 17:30:29 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress) It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy a550b878b52367ae89f97d929baa2799bca514692d5486820519f16deb61f698

The link no longer opened: Turing read it from the Internet Archive copy.

En la sección Congresos y gobiernosThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note

In the Memorial

This article is connected to stories we have already documented.

Note detailsMedio, fechas

Data

Outlet
A unified
Published
August 25, 1990
Last analyzed
November 13, 2026
Turing
3.0 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.