Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Guanajuato aprueba matrimonio igualitario y prohíbe terapias de conversión (ECOSIG), pero rechaza despenalizar el aborto

El Imparcial · published on December 5, 2025

The essentials

Very good

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual, habla de diversidad sexual.

Published
December 5, 2025
Analyzed
November 6, 2026
State
Online

Share this analysis

The full analysis

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual, habla de diversidad sexual.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2025 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v1.6.6 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism Mild · 1 pointing · subtraction 4
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 5 strengths
Inclusive language 60%

How to read this rating

  • It has a yellowish detail, shown below. They take points off, but they are not enough to call it a “sensationalist article”: that happens when sensationalism sets the tone of the whole article. In the statistics it counts among articles “with some sensationalist detail”.
  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Sensationalism−4
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. Inclusive language+1
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−9
  6. Rating98

Turing la relacionó con lo que ya sabe el sitio

What is worth changing

  1. Yellow journalism in the headline · counts double Guanajuato aprueba matrimonio igualitario y prohíbe terapias de conversión (ECOSIG), pero rechaza despenalizar el aborto Capitalized words in the headline seek to alarm.

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Human rights approach
  • Names SOGIECE (wrongly called “conversion therapy”)

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Legislative observatory

The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the article.

Legislative observatory

Since this article talks about of legislators, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Reconocimiento de la identidad de género · Matrimonio igualitario y uniones

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Karol Jared González Márquez No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record
  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · Morena

    María Eugenia García Oliveros No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record
  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · Morena

    Miriam Reyes Carmona No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record
  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · Movimiento Ciudadano

    Sandra Alicia Pedroza Orozco No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record
  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Susana Bermúdez Cano No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs of the article where we found something, without reproducing it in full. Each underline style is a type of finding; the number refers to the list above. Hover over or tap a mark to see why we flagged it.

abc Generic masculine abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

El Congreso de Guanajuato ha cerrado un periodo legislativo con decisiones que marcan un avance histórico en procedures para un sector de la población y mantienen una restricción de larga data para otro. En una misma jornada, las y los diputados aprobaron dos reformas clave: el matrimonio igualitario y la prohibición de las llamadas “terapias de conversión”. Sin embargo, también votaron, por quinta vez …

… cónyuges”. Durante el debate, legisladoras como María Eugenia García Oliveros y Sandra Alicia Pedroza Orozco destacaron argumentos a favor de la reforma: No todos los legisladores apoyaron la modificación: la diputada Susana Bermúdez Cano votó en contra, argumentando que el Código Civil anterior “no era discriminatorio” y que ya …

… la reforma se aprobó por mayoría de votos. En una acción paralela, el Congreso reformó el Código Penal para prohibir y sancionar los Esfuerzos para Corregir la Orientación Sexual or the Identidad de Género (ECOSIG). Ahora, imponer u obligar a un menor o persona incapaz a recibir estas “prácticas” se castigará con 2 a 6 años de prisión y multa. Se considera ECOSIG cualquier sesión psicológica, psiquiátrica, médica o tratamiento que use violencia física, moral o psicoemocional con el fin de anular la orientación sexual o gender identity de una persona. Si el responsable es el padre, madre o tutor, la pena incluirá tratamiento psicoterapéutico obligatorio. Las diputadas expusieron el daño profundo de …

… de derechos reproductivos. Estas decisiones reflejan las profundas divisiones sociales y políticas que existen en torno a los derechos de autonomía personal, la sexual diversity y el papel del Estado en la vida privada de the people.

About the note

Data

Byline
Adriana Zarate
Published
December 5, 2025
Last analyzed
November 6, 2026
Turing
1.6.6 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 98Version 1 · November 6, 2026 · 621 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.