la diaria ladiaria.com.uy
By la diaria ·
abc What it does well
Salud y sexual diversity: se presentó una nueva guía de atención para profesionales
Analysis of the article
Salud y diversidad sexual: se presentó una nueva guía de atención para profesionales
la diaria · published on September 4, 2026
The most important
¿Qué pasó?
Informative news
It informs without a clear event for or against.
Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.
¿Cómo lo contó el medio?
100out of 100
Very good
The article uses respectful language.
- Nada que corregir
- 1 thing it does well
What Can I Do?
We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-45V9-7Z7S
On this page
The marked note
Los párrafos donde encontramos algo
Lo subrayado es la forma de nombrar. Toca una marca para ver por qué. No copiamos la nota completa.
Qué cambiar y qué hace bien
What it does well
Cómo se calculó el 100 está en Find out more.
100out of 100
Very good
- Respectful
The article uses respectful language.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2026 Date of publication
Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
- Google Gemini: no need
- OpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq: no need
- Claude from Anthropic: no need
What takes points off
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
Derogatory terms
No flags
Name and gender
No flags
Blames the victim
No flags
Sensationalism
No flags
Hostile speech
No flags
Imprecise terms
No flags
What adds points
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
Gender and rights perspective
1 strength
Inclusive language
Not applicable
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
- Every article starts with100
- Gender and rights perspective+2
- Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100
Turing related it to what the site already knows
- la diaria · Observatorio de Medios · 3 notas · promedio 99 de 100
What it does well
- Talks about sexual diversity
¿Es cierto lo que dice?
¿Es cierto lo que dice la nota?
Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.
Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...
See a mistake?
Is this analysis correct?
Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.
To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.
Un dato está mal
Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.
Avisar de un datoSoy del medio
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewFind out more
Cómo se calculó el 100Lo que resta y lo que suma, la versión de Turing y si ayudó una IA
Se ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».
The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-45V9-7Z7S, su certificado y su valor legal
The proof
Certified copy
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-45V9-7Z7S
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 17:15:05 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
- 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
- 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 17:15:05 (Central Mexico time).
- 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
- 4. Copy at Internet Archive (done) Saved on November 11, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy on the Internet Archive (opens in another tab)
- 5. Monitoring (done) It was still online on November 13, 2026. We check it from time to time.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Backed up on archive.org
Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 11, 2026, 23:20 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.
Why does this make it authentic?
- It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
- The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
- Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
- It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
- Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy
47ab728b344e221c4d2fa9777685951a9ab9cabb4d4274b45f102277fefabe3b
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
What is it worth as evidence?
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
Note detailsMedium, dates, and saved versions
Data
- Outlet
- la diaria
- Byline
- la diaria
- Published
- September 4, 2026
- Last analyzed
- November 11, 2026
- Turing
- 2.8 (the current one)
- State
- Online
Saved versions
- 100Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 165 words
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Keep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.