Skip to content
Send a link to Turing

Analysis of the article

Agreden a pareja gay en Chihuahua; "somos seres humanos, no le hacemos daño a nadie"

Grupo Milenio · published on September 15, 2021

The most important

¿Qué pasó?

Bad news for the community

It reports an assault. Also: it quotes words against the community.

Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.

¿Cómo lo contó el medio?

Very good

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones. 3 expresiones aparecen citadas o denunciadas y no cuentan.

El 98 es por cómo lo escribió, no porque sea buena noticia.

What Can I Do?

Ver la nota marcada Read on milenio.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-MUF4-S8GJ

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. The marked note
  3. Qué cambiar y qué hace bien
  4. ¿Es cierto lo que dice?
  5. Who speaks 4
  6. See a mistake?
  7. Find out more

The marked note

Los párrafos donde encontramos algo

Lo subrayado es la forma de nombrar. Toca una marca para ver por qué. No copiamos la nota completa.

Grupo Milenio milenio.com

Agreden a pareja gay en Chihuahua; "somos seres humanos, no le hacemos daño a nadie"

By Norma Ponce ·

abc Quoted or analyzed (does not count) abc What it does well «…» Direct quote

… tomamos de la mano y un grupo aproximado de diez hombres, entre los 28 y 35 años, nos alcanzaron y empezaron a insultarnos. Nos dijeron que este no era un espacio para jotos, que nos fuéramos a jotear a otra parte, nos gritaron fucking, maricones.“Les molestó que los ignoramos y justo en ese momento se fueron a los golpes contra nosotros, comenzaron con mi esposo y yo para tratar de salvarlo o rescatarlo, me …

… una denuncia por lesiones en la Fiscalía de Chihuahua, sin embargo, la denuncia fue reclasificada por el delito de discriminación y adicionalmente se activó el Protocol de Actuación en la Investigación de Delitos que involucren a personas de la sexual diversity, que es el primero en el país en hacerse oficial y obligatorio para toda la Fiscalía del estado de Chihuahua.Este protocol surgió luego de que en mayo de 2020, la entonces regidora Catalina Bustillos expresó que la sexual diversity se debe a la falta de identidad y que la homosexualidad se podía curar con una buena alimentación y medicamentos. “El protocol es importante porque habla de los agravantes que demuestran cuando hay acciones que motivan al hatred, que nos podrían llevar incluso a los hate crimes o cualquier otro tipo de violencia por razones de género, pertenecientes a la sexual diversity. Sale de esa necesidad porque las Fiscalías no tienen ni herramientas y ahora vendrá el proceso de capacitación a quienes son investigadores con esta perspectiva. A …

… acto en contra de su identidad, en contra de su expresión y en contra de su orientación”, dijo a MILENIO, Mercedes Fernández, presidenta del movimiento Igualitario LGBT.Por ello, agregó, solicitarán una carpeta profesionalizada donde la Fiscalía requiera todas las pruebas para demostrar que la pareja fue agredida. “Queremos que …

Qué cambiar y qué hace bien

What it does well

Cómo se calculó el 98 está en Find out more.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones. 3 expresiones aparecen citadas o denunciadas y no cuentan.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2021 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 5 strengths
Inclusive language Not applicable
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+10
  3. Only gives voice to the authorities−3
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−9
  5. Rating98

Turing related it to what the site already knows

  • Grupo Milenio · Observatorio de Medios · 70 notas · promedio 97 de 100

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities2 times
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • ExpertsNo

It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.

What the article quotes, denounces or attributes to other people

These expressions appear in textual quotations, as terms that the text examines or in words of other people that the note reports or points out as an offense. Naming them to report or denounce them is not using them, so they do not count in the rating.

  • Términos despectivos · en una cita que se denuncia …era un espacio para jotos, que nos fuéramos a jotear a otra parte, nos gritaron putos, maricones.“Les molestó que los ignoramos y justo en ese momento se fueron a los golpes contra…
  • Términos despectivos · en una cita que se denuncia …nos alcanzaron y empezaron a insultarnos. Nos dijeron que este no era un espacio para jotos, que nos fuéramos a jotear a otra parte, nos gritaron putos, maricones.“Les molestó…
  • Términos despectivos · en una cita que se denuncia …este no era un espacio para jotos, que nos fuéramos a jotear a otra parte, nos gritaron fucking, maricones.“Les molestó que los ignoramos y justo en ese momento se fueron a los…

What it does well

  • Names the hate crime
  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Names discrimination
  • Mentions action protocols

¿Es cierto lo que dice?

¿Es cierto lo que dice la nota?

Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Quién habla en la nota

Las personas con cargo público y las otras voces que aparecen, y si están a favor o en contra de nuestros derechos.

Quién lo publica, quién habla y a quién

Lo publica
Grupo MilenioMedia outlet
Quiénes hablan
Catalina BustillosRegidora
Mercedes FernándezPresidenta del movimiento Igualitario LGBT+
Rubén Acosta
Óscar Urquizo

Turing reconoce a cada persona por su nombre, su apodo o su cuenta, aunque la nota lo escriba mal. Lo que dice queda en su perfil y el mensaje, también en el perfil de quien lo recibe.

Political directory

Turing created or updated their profile with what this post says. See the Political directory.

See a mistake?

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Un dato está mal

Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.

Avisar de un dato

Soy del medio

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Find out more

Cómo se calculó el 98Lo que resta y lo que suma, la versión de Turing y si ayudó una IA

Se ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-MUF4-S8GJ, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-MUF4-S8GJ

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 12, 2026, 01:20:05 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-MUF4-S8GJ Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 12, 2026, 01:20:05 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 12, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 12, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 12, 2026, 07:20 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 11214471391242b2456746acb4dde0f52ca68945535cc4e32647bf6f18a8cedf

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

In the Legislative ObservatoryThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note

In the Memorial

This article is connected to stories we have already documented.

Note detailsMedium, dates, and saved versions

Data

Byline
Norma Ponce
Published
September 15, 2021
Last analyzed
November 12, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Saved versions

  • 98Version 1 · November 12, 2026 · 573 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.