Skip to content
Send a link to Turing

Analysis of the article

Diputados aprueban Presupuesto de Egresos 2027: deuda de México llegará a 21.7 billones de pesos

EL CEO · published on November 11, 2026

The most important

¿Qué pasó?

Informative news

It informs without a clear event for or against.

Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.

¿Cómo lo contó el medio?

Very good

The article uses respectful language.

What Can I Do?

Ver la nota marcada Leer en elceo.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-XZ3J-QFM8

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. The marked note
  3. Qué cambiar y qué hace bien
  4. ¿Es cierto lo que dice?
  5. See a mistake?
  6. Find out more

The marked note

Los párrafos donde encontramos algo

Lo subrayado es la forma de nombrar. Toca una marca para ver por qué. No copiamos la nota completa.

EL CEO elceo.com

Diputados aprueban Presupuesto de Egresos 2027: deuda de México llegará a 21.7 billones de pesos

By Pool CEO ·

abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Por otro lado, mientras que el gasto público se enfocará en darle una mayor cobertura a los ramos de educación, salud y vivienda, con énfasis en the people, comunidades y regiones históricamente excluidas.

Además, el decreto contempla dos nuevos anexos: el Anexo Transversal 32 enfocado en “Movilidad y Seguridad Vial” que tendrá 175,045 millones de pesos y el Anexo Transversal 33 para “Diversidad Sexual y de Género”, con un presupuesto de 42,369 mdp.

Qué cambiar y qué hace bien

What it does well

Cómo se calculó el 100 está en Find out more.

Very good

  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

Context pieceGives data, background or analysis. Strong expressions that it only describes or attributes to the press do not count.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from Google Gemini

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 1 strength
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+2
  3. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

Turing related it to what the site already knows

What it does well

  • Talks about sexual diversity

¿Es cierto lo que dice?

¿Es cierto lo que dice la nota?

Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

See a mistake?

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Un dato está mal

Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.

Avisar de un dato

Soy del medio

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Find out more

Cómo se calculó el 100Lo que resta y lo que suma, la versión de Turing y si ayudó una IA

Se ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-XZ3J-QFM8, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-XZ3J-QFM8

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 12, 2026, 03:44:19 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-XZ3J-QFM8 Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 12, 2026, 03:44:19 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 12, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 455bc94705430771ce6c25d79592b22fa1e868d145aba422f0b872ad01c2d40d

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

In the Legislative ObservatoryThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note

Legislative observatory

Since this article talks about of a legislator, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Legal gender recognition

  • Diputación federal · Verde

    Raúl Bolaños-Cacho Cué No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

Note detailsMedium, dates, and saved versions

Data

Outlet
EL CEO
Byline
Pool CEO
Published
November 11, 2026
Last analyzed
November 12, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 12, 2026 · 625 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.