Skip to content
Send a link to Turing

Analysis of the article

Avalan diputados el presupuesto 2027 por 10.6 billones de pesos y pasa al Ejecutivo federal

Diario De México · published on November 11, 2026

The most important

¿Qué pasó?

Mala noticia para nuestros derechos

It reports the stance against our rights of a person who holds public office.

Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.

¿Cómo lo contó el medio?

Very good

The article uses respectful language. It mostly uses the generic masculine.

El 98 es por cómo lo escribió, no porque sea buena noticia.

What Can I Do?

Ver la nota marcada Leer en diariodemexico.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-FD69-W8SV

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. The marked note
  3. Qué cambiar y qué hace bien
  4. ¿Es cierto lo que dice?
  5. Who speaks 5
  6. See a mistake?
  7. Find out more

The marked note

Los párrafos donde encontramos algo

Lo subrayado es la forma de nombrar. Toca una marca para ver por qué. No copiamos la nota completa.

Diario De México diariodemexico.com

Avalan diputados el presupuesto 2027 por 10.6 billones de pesos y pasa al Ejecutivo federal

By Israel Campos Montes ·

abc Generic masculine abc What it does well «…» Direct quote

• Comisión Nacional de Búsqueda de Personas: 300 millones de pesos.

En respuesta, la legisladora emecista Gloria Núñez reviró señalando el pasado político de la congresista de Morena: "Es lastimoso que se olvide de su origen. Aquí mencionó a los diputados 'fosfo fosfo', pero aquí en esta misma tribuna esa diputada traía los tenis 'fosfo fosfo', ¿o ya se le olvidó?".

"Aquí les traigo sus nuevos tenis 'fosfo fosfo' y guinda guinda. Aquí están, pónganselos, vayan al país, vayan con los mexicanos y díganles que los traicionaron, díganle que son un movimiento comparsa de Morena... Presúmanlos en el país y díganles que ustedes son un movimiento migajero", expresó el político tricolor.

Finalmente, el dictamen integra dos nuevos anexos transversales: el Anexo 32 ("Movilidad y Seguridad Vial") con 175 mil 45.5 millones de pesos, y el Anexo 33 ("Diversidad Sexual y de Género") con 43 mil 369.4 millones de pesos.

✅ Las y los diputados aprobaron el Presupuesto de Egresos de la Federación 2027, que contempla un gasto de 10.6 billones de pesos. Con 352 votos a favor, 130 en contra y cero abstenciones en lo particular, el decreto fue remitido al Ejecutivo Federal. 🔗 Conoce los detalles: https://t.co/0SRXHJgCzD #LXVILegislatura

Qué cambiar y qué hace bien

What it does well

Cómo se calculó el 98 está en Find out more.

Very good

  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language. It mostly uses the generic masculine.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 2 strengths
Inclusive language 25%
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+4
  3. Generic masculine−3
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−3
  5. Rating98

Turing related it to what the site already knows

What it does well

  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Helps the search

¿Es cierto lo que dice?

¿Es cierto lo que dice la nota?

Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Quién habla en la nota

Las personas con cargo público y las otras voces que aparecen, y si están a favor o en contra de nuestros derechos.

Quién lo publica, quién habla y a quién

Lo publica
Diario De MéxicoMedia outlet
Quiénes hablan
Raúl Bolaños-Cacho CuéLegislador del PVEM
Ricardo Monreal ÁvilaPresidente de la Junta de Coordinación Política
Merilyn Gómez PozosDiputada morenista
Gloria Elizabeth Núñez SánchezLegisladora emecista
Arturo Yañez CuellarDiputado PRI
Se dirige a
Merilyn Gómez PozosDiputada morenista

Turing reconoce a cada persona por su nombre, su apodo o su cuenta, aunque la nota lo escriba mal. Lo que dice queda en su perfil y el mensaje, también en el perfil de quien lo recibe.

See a mistake?

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Un dato está mal

Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.

Avisar de un dato

Soy del medio

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Find out more

Cómo se calculó el 98Lo que resta y lo que suma, la versión de Turing y si ayudó una IA

Se ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-FD69-W8SV, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-FD69-W8SV

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 12, 2026, 05:21:46 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-FD69-W8SV Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 12, 2026, 05:21:46 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 12, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 12, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 12, 2026, 13:55 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 7036dbf07be92076c306cefa9b56bdc71d0563ef5ffea303dbaab25a6d863621

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

In the Legislative ObservatoryThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note

Legislative observatory

Since this article talks about of legislators, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Legal gender recognition

  • Diputación federal · Morena

    Ricardo Monreal Ávila In favor

    What the article says (pending decision):“propuesta que fue descartada por el morenista Ricardo Monreal Ávila, presidente de la Junta de Coordinación Política, quien argumentó: "Hemos decidido que ya no habrá más recortes al Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE)…”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record

  • Diputación federal · Morena

    Merilyn Gómez Pozos Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“La diputada morenista Merilyn Gómez Pozos arremetió contra la bancada de MC al negar que los fondos respondieran a un pacto con el gobierno jalisciense.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record

  • Diputación federal · Movimiento Ciudadano

    Gloria Elizabeth Núñez Sánchez Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“En respuesta, la legisladora emecista Gloria Núñez reviró señalando el pasado político de la congresista de Morena: "Es lastimoso que se olvide de su origen. Aquí mencionó a los diputados 'fosfo fosfo', pero aquí en…”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record

  • Diputación federal · PRI

    Arturo Yañez Cuellar No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación federal · Verde

    Raúl Bolaños-Cacho Cué No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

Note detailsMedium, dates, and saved versions

Data

Byline
Israel Campos Montes
Published
November 11, 2026
Last analyzed
November 12, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 98Version 1 · November 12, 2026 · 931 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.