Skip to content

Analysis of the article

La Jornada: Avala Congreso de Guanajuato matrimonios entre personas del mismo sexo

La Jornada · published on December 5, 2025

The most important

¿Qué pasó?

Good news for the community

It reports progress in rights. También: recoge la postura en contra de una persona con cargo público.

Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.

¿Cómo lo contó el medio?

Very good

The article uses respectful language.

What Can I Do?

Ver la nota marcada Leer en jornada.com.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-2MJP-N8DJ

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. The marked note
  3. Qué cambiar y qué hace bien
  4. ¿Es cierto lo que dice? 5
  5. Who speaks 5
  6. See a mistake?
  7. Find out more

The marked note

Los párrafos donde encontramos algo

Lo subrayado es la forma de nombrar. Toca una marca para ver por qué. No copiamos la nota completa.

La Jornada jornada.com.mx

La Jornada: Avala Congreso de Guanajuato matrimonios entre personas del mismo sexo

By DEMOS, Desarrollo de Medios, S.A. de C.V. ·

abc Generic masculine abc What it does well «…» Direct quote

Guanajuato, Gto., El Congreso de Guanajuato reformó ayer el Código Civil de la entidad, con el voto dividido de los diputados del Partido Acción Nacional (PAN), para que las parejas del mismo sexo puedan contraer matrimonio. De esta forma, Aguascalientes y Chihuahua son las únicas entidades de la República que mantienen la prohibición a las uniones de este tipo, aunque se autorizan por medio de amparos.

En la misma sesión, la legislatura estatal tipificó en el Código Penal los delitos contra la expresión o gender identity, y la sexual orientation. Así, quien imparta u obligue a un menor de edad o incapaz a recibir terapias para corregir la sexual orientation, la identidad o expresión de género, será castigado con prisión de dos a seis años.

Los legisladores panistas, que han defendido “la vida desde la concepción” y la familia “tradicional”, se dividieron en cuanto a la aprobación de los matrimonios igualitarios. Seis votaron a favor de la reforma, ocho se pronunciaron contra y la representante por el distrito 1, Angélica Casillas, se abstuvo.

Qué cambiar y qué hace bien

What it does well

Cómo se calculó el 97 está en Find out more.

Very good

  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2025 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 3 strengths
Inclusive language 0%
How we arrived at 97 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+6
  3. Generic masculine−5
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−4
  5. Rating97

Turing related it to what the site already knows

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names gender expression

¿Es cierto lo que dice?

¿Es cierto lo que dice la nota?

Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.

  1. The article

    «Los legisladores panistas, que han defendido “la vida desde la concepción” y la familia “tradicional”, se dividieron en cuanto a la aprobación de los matrimonios igualitarios.»

    Partly matches

    En la sección Congresos y gobiernos tenemos 8 iniciativas sobre matrimonio igualitario: 4 aprobadas, 4 en trámite y 0 rechazadas. La afirmación no dice de qué estado se trata, así que buscamos en todo el país.

    See the evidence
4 cosas que todavía no podemos comprobar

  1. The article

    «Además se archivaron tres iniciativas de reforma a la Constitución local y a la Ley de Acceso a las Mujeres a una Vida Libre de Violencia relativas a la despenalización del aborto.»

    Todavía no lo podemos comprobar

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  2. The article

    «Seis votaron a favor de la reforma, ocho se pronunciaron contra y la representante por el distrito 1, Angélica Casillas, se abstuvo.»

    Todavía no lo podemos comprobar

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  3. The article

    «Los panistas que avalaron la reforma fueron Arturo Espadas, Aldo Márquez, Ana María Esquivel, Carlos Terán, Jesús Hernández y Salvador Tovar.»

    Todavía no lo podemos comprobar

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  4. The article

    «La rechazaron Juan Carlos Romero Hicks, Noemí Márquez, Erandi Bermúdez, Jared González, María Isabel Ortiz, Susana Bermúdez, Yesenia Rojas y Rolando Fortino Alcántar.»

    Todavía no lo podemos comprobar

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Informe completo: VR-2026-SKJ8CD · PDF. Turing compara con lo que tenemos documentado (un conteo mínimo).

Who speaks

Quién habla en la nota

Las personas con cargo público y las otras voces que aparecen, y si están a favor o en contra de nuestros derechos.

Legislators quoted

Lo que dijeron cuenta en su evaluación de la sección Congresos y gobiernos. Cada postura pasó una verificación: la cita está en la nota, es de esta persona y una segunda revisión con IA coincide.

Talk about this initiative

See a mistake?

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Un dato está mal

Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.

Avisar de un dato

Soy del medio

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Find out more

Cómo se calculó el 97Lo que resta y lo que suma, la versión de Turing y si ayudó una IA

Se ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-2MJP-N8DJ, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-2MJP-N8DJ

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 12, 2026, 11:25:16 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-2MJP-N8DJ Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 12, 2026, 11:25:16 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 12, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 12, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 12, 2026, 17:52 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 802c2d8069b97808b9fc15e6c83444f19e845e54d08fb24c6c5ac4da1d255879

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

En la sección Congresos y gobiernosThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note

Congresses and governments

Como esta nota habla de una iniciativa y de personas legisladoras, la registramos en automático en la sección Congresses and governments. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Reconocimiento de la identidad de género · Matrimonio igualitario y uniones

  • Bill · Guanajuato

    Matrimonio igualitario en el Código Civil

    The AI found that the note speaks to this initiative. The note already appears on your page.

    See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Aldo Iván Márquez Becerra In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Los panistas que avalaron la reforma fueron Arturo Espadas, Aldo Márquez, Ana María Esquivel, Carlos Terán, Jesús Hernández y Salvador Tovar.”

    Unconfirmed: it is visible on their record, but it does not count in their evaluation until it is confirmed by their official account, an official source or another independent outlet.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Ana María Esquivel Arrona In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Los panistas que avalaron la reforma fueron Arturo Espadas, Aldo Márquez, Ana María Esquivel, Carlos Terán, Jesús Hernández y Salvador Tovar.”

    Unconfirmed: it is visible on their record, but it does not count in their evaluation until it is confirmed by their official account, an official source or another independent outlet.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Angélica Casillas Martínez Neutral or ambiguous

    “Los panistas que avalaron la reforma fueron Arturo Espadas, Aldo Márquez, Ana María Esquivel, Carlos Terán, Jesús Hernández y Salvador Tovar. La rechazaron Juan Carlos Romero Hicks, Noemí Márquez, Erandi Bermúdez, Jared…”

    Unconfirmed: it is visible on their record, but it does not count in their evaluation until it is confirmed by their official account, an official source or another independent outlet.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Jesús Hernández Hernández In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Los panistas que avalaron la reforma fueron Arturo Espadas, Aldo Márquez, Ana María Esquivel, Carlos Terán, Jesús Hernández y Salvador Tovar.”

    Unconfirmed: it is visible on their record, but it does not count in their evaluation until it is confirmed by their official account, an official source or another independent outlet.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Jorge Arturo Espadas Galván In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Los panistas que avalaron la reforma fueron Arturo Espadas, Aldo Márquez, Ana María Esquivel, Carlos Terán, Jesús Hernández y Salvador Tovar.”

    Unconfirmed: it is visible on their record, but it does not count in their evaluation until it is confirmed by their official account, an official source or another independent outlet.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Juan Carlos Romero Hicks Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“La rechazaron Juan Carlos Romero Hicks, Noemí Márquez, Erandi Bermúdez, Jared González, María Isabel Ortiz, Susana Bermúdez, Yesenia Rojas y Rolando Fortino Alcántar.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Karol Jared González Márquez Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“La rechazaron Juan Carlos Romero Hicks, Noemí Márquez, Erandi Bermúdez, Jared González, María Isabel Ortiz, Susana Bermúdez, Yesenia Rojas y Rolando Fortino Alcántar.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PRD

    María del Pilar Gómez Enríquez Neutral or ambiguous

    What the article says (pending decision):“Los panistas que avalaron la reforma fueron Arturo Espadas, Aldo Márquez, Ana María Esquivel, Carlos Terán, Jesús Hernández y Salvador Tovar. La rechazaron Juan Carlos Romero Hicks, Noemí Márquez, Erandi Bermúdez, Jared…”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    María Isabel Ortiz Mantilla Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“La rechazaron Juan Carlos Romero Hicks, Noemí Márquez, Erandi Bermúdez, Jared González, María Isabel Ortiz, Susana Bermúdez, Yesenia Rojas y Rolando Fortino Alcántar.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Noemí Márquez Márquez Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“También votaron en contra la diputada del PRI, Rocío Cervantes Barba, y María del Pilar Gómez, legisladora del PRD.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Roberto Carlos Terán Ramos In favor Speaks respectfully

    What the article says (pending decision):“Los panistas que avalaron la reforma fueron Arturo Espadas, Aldo Márquez, Ana María Esquivel, Carlos Terán, Jesús Hernández y Salvador Tovar.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PRI

    Rocío Cervantes Barba Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“También votaron en contra la diputada del PRI, Rocío Cervantes Barba, y María del Pilar Gómez, legisladora del PRD.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Rolando Fortino Alcántar Rojas Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“La rechazaron Juan Carlos Romero Hicks, Noemí Márquez, Erandi Bermúdez, Jared González, María Isabel Ortiz, Susana Bermúdez, Yesenia Rojas y Rolando Fortino Alcántar.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Susana Bermúdez Cano Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“La rechazaron Juan Carlos Romero Hicks, Noemí Márquez, Erandi Bermúdez, Jared González, María Isabel Ortiz, Susana Bermúdez, Yesenia Rojas y Rolando Fortino Alcántar.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · PAN

    Yesenia Rojas Cervantes Against Negative connotations

    What the article says (pending decision):“La rechazaron Juan Carlos Romero Hicks, Noemí Márquez, Erandi Bermúdez, Jared González, María Isabel Ortiz, Susana Bermúdez, Yesenia Rojas y Rolando Fortino Alcántar.”

    Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Guanajuato · Sin partido

    José Salvador Tovar Vargas No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

Otros temas de la notaGender-based violence

In the cross-cutting issues

Turing reads it apart from the grade: the grade measures how it is written; this shows what counts in each topic. See all issues.

Note detailsMedium, dates, and saved versions

Data

Byline
DEMOS, Desarrollo de Medios, S.A. de C.V.
Published
December 5, 2025
Last analyzed
November 12, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 97Version 1 · November 12, 2026 · 268 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.