The whole site
Analysis of the article
Noticaribe · published on September 3, 2026
What happened?
Informative news
It informs without a clear event for or against.
Turing says this when he reads the note.
How did the media report it?
The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.
What Can I Do?
We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-QAY4-DM8S
Preliminary analysis: Turing has not yet finished reviewing this note and will complete it as soon as possible.
The note, in summary
0 cosas que hizo mal · 2 que hizo bien
Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en Noticaribe.
Nothing to correct in the way you name things.
Citas breves de la nota de Noticaribe, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.
Noticaribe noticaribe.com.mx
By Editor VI ·
abc What it does well «…» Direct quote
… beneficiará a las cuotas, es decir a quienes pertenecen a las affirmative actions que son LGBT, persona joven, persona con discapacidad, adulto mayor, persona de …
Would you like to read the full article? Está en la página de Noticaribe. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.
Leer en noticaribe.com.mx (opens in a new tab)What to change and what is working well
Nada que corregir · 2 que hace bien
Cómo se calculó el 98 está en Find out more.
Very good
The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2026 Date of publication
Analyzed with Turing v3.1 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
Turing related it to what the site already knows
It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.
"It's true what he says."
1 en parte · 3 sin comprobar
Turing compares the figures, laws, and cases it mentions with what we have documented. We don't say "false": if something doesn't add up, we show you the evidence.
The article
«En el caso de la queja interpuesta por Movimiento Ciudadano sobre la misma reforma al articulo 383, el diputado aclaró que no tenían la obligación de someterla a consulta ciudadana “porque esta reforma beneficiará a las cuotas, es decir a quienes pertenecen a las acciones afirmativas que son LGBT, persona joven, persona con discapacidad, adulto mayor, persona de los pueblos originarios, afromexica»
Partly matchesEn la sección Congresos y gobiernos tenemos 8 iniciativas sobre acciones afirmativas: 2 aprobadas, 6 en trámite y 0 rechazadas. La afirmación no dice de qué estado se trata, así que buscamos en todo el país.
See the evidenceThe article
«Por Rafael Briceño CHETUMAL, MX.- Luego de que el Congreso respondió a la sentencia de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (SCJN) que invalidó la permanencia de Heyden Cebada Rivas como magistrado hasta el 2033 y el exhorto para que, en el marco de su libertad configurativa, determine las medidas legislativas conducentes a fin de que se garantice la regularidad en el funcionamiento del Poder»
We still can't verify itIt isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.
See the evidenceThe article
«VIDEO | Señala el diputado Saulo Aguilar que Congreso local respondió al exhorto de la Suprema Corte sobre la inconstitucionalidad de la reforma judicial de Quintana Roo mas no han recibido ulterior noticia del máximo tribunal https://t.co/O7GaQg8dCw pic.twitter.com/ducJwAwoTK — Noticaribe (@Noticaribe) September 3, 2026 Aclaró que, en su calidad de presidente de la Comisión Permanente, no ha reci»
We still can't verify itIt isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.
See the evidenceThe article
«Aguilar Bernes aclaró que, hasta el momento, únicamente han tenido conocimiento de la resolución emitida a favor del Congreso sobre la reforma al articulo 383 de la Ley de Instituciones y Procedimientos Electorales de Quintana Roo que excluye a los candidatos y candidatas a las presidencias municipales de la repartición de regidurías por el principio de representación proporcional y cuya impugnaci»
We still can't verify itIt isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.
See the evidenceFull Report: VR-2026-XH4DDE · PDF. Turing compares with what we have documented (a minimum count).
Who speaks
1 persona: Saulo Aguilar Bernés
Public officials and the other voices that appear, and whether they are for or against our rights.
Turing recognizes each person by their name, nickname, or account, even if the note is misspelled. What you say remains on your profile and in the message, as well as on the profile of the person who receives it.
Correct Turing or request a review
Is this analysis correct?
Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.
To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.
A person, a date, a figure, or a position that doesn't match. Write to us and we'll check it out.
Report a data pointIf you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewThis can be seen in “What to change and what is being done well.”
The proof
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-QAY4-DM8S
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 13, 2026, 21:11:39 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
GHOSTARCHIVE · ghostarchive.org
Respaldada en Ghostarchive
Ghostarchive es un archivo público e independiente, sin relación con Memoria y Resistencia ni con quien publicó. Guardó its own copy de la página el 14 nov 2026, 15:23:40 (hora del centro de México). Acepta sitios que Internet Archive no guarda, como X.
Ghostarchive es un servicio de terceros. Lo usamos solo para indicar dónde está la copia; no es un aval de su parte.
54731f7a7560131c8e8220d5b80fe86951f99e3033254b18edbe86b285f871f5
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That's why every copy uses open standards that anyone can check without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin, and Ghostarchive's standalone copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
Como esta nota habla de una persona legisladora, la registramos en automático en la sección Congresses and governments. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.
Topic: Affirmative action and political representation
Diputación local de Quintana Roo · Morena
Saulo Aguilar Bernés In favor
What the article says (pending decision):“Insistió en que Heyden Cebada sigue siendo magistrado “pero no nos ha notificado nada la Suprema Corte de Justicia”. Tenemos entendido que es un tema procesal y pues estamos a la espera a ver qué nos resuelve la Suprema…”
Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.
