La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, enfoque de derechos humanos, da voz a colectivos y activistas.
Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en Noroeste.
What you did well
Talks about sexual diversity
Human rights approach
Gives a voice to collectives and activists
Respects the presumption of innocence
and what they did wrong.
Nothing to correct in the way you name things.
The phrases Turing highlighted
Citas breves de la nota de Noroeste, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.
North West noroeste.com.mx
Emma Zermeño se manifiesta en el Congreso de Sinaloa y cuestiona actuar de la Diputada Almendra Negrete
By Belem Angulo ·
abc What it does well
The activist y funcionaria estatal Emma Zermeño López se manifestó este martes en el Congreso del Estado de Sinaloa, acompañada por groups feministas y de la sexual diversity, para denunciar presuntos atropellos en su contra y exigir que no se …
… pacífica surgió como una iniciativa ciudadana en conjunto con groups, en respaldo a la activist, quien mantiene un conflicto legal derivado de una denuncia por …
Would you like to read the full article? Está en la página de Noroeste. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.
La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, enfoque de derechos humanos, da voz a colectivos y activistas.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
North West· Observatorio de Medios · 18 notas · promedio 99 de 100
Who does it listen to?
Authorities1 time
Family, friends and neighborsNo
Collectives and organizations1 time
Experts1 time
What it does well
Talks about sexual diversity
Human rights approach
Gives a voice to collectives and activists
Respects the presumption of innocence
"It's true what he says."
Is what the note says true?
2 sin comprobar
Turing compares the figures, laws, and cases it mentions with what we have documented. We don't say "false": if something doesn't add up, we show you the evidence.
2 cosas que todavía no podemos comprobar
The article
«La protesta pacífica surgió como una iniciativa ciudadana en conjunto con colectivos, en respaldo a la activista, quien mantiene un conflicto legal derivado de una denuncia por presunta violencia política en razón de género interpuesta por la diputada local con licencia por Morena, Almendra Negrete Sánchez.»
We still can't verify it
It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.
«Para solicitar apoyos en particular de esta situación, sobre todo, para ver si hay una falta dentro de este proceso que tuviera que ver con alguna falta al código de ética del Congreso para que el Órgano Interno de Control pueda revisar si ya hay algo que no esté de acuerdo a las reglas”, dijo la funcionaria y experta en Derechos Humanos.»
We still can't verify it
It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done)We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done)An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 13, 2026, 21:36:43 (Central Mexico time).
3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done)The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress)It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
5. Monitoring (done)It was still online on November 14, 2026. We check it from time to time.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Why does this make it authentic?
It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
SHA-256 fingerprint of the copya6039001273493f58a35fd1f2062536a38ca0992cd08a80800276d2ac6ade50e
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
In the Legislatures and Governments sectionThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note
Congresses and governments
The article is about the work of a congress. It does not name any legislator from the directory, but it does name other voices that take or avoid taking a position; they are below.
“se manifestó este martes en el Congreso del Estado de Sinaloa, acompañada por colectivos feministas y de la diversidad sexual, para denunciar presuntos atropellos en su contra y exigir que no se deseche la impugnación”
It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
Other topics in the articleGender-based political violence
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Keep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.
North West noroeste.com.mx
Is this analysis correct?