The whole site
Analysis of the article
Original From Mexico DF · published on April 25, 2025
¿Qué pasó?
Mala noticia para nuestros derechos
It quotes words against the community.
Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.
¿Cómo lo contó el medio?
La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la orientación sexual, nombra a las personas no binarias, habla de diversidad sexual.
What is worth changing
El 97 es por cómo lo escribió, no porque sea buena noticia.
What Can I Do?
We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-26CQ-8MY2
Análisis preliminar: Turing aún no termina de revisar esta nota y la completará solo en cuanto pueda.
La nota, en resumen
Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en Chilango.
Citas breves de la nota de Chilango, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.
Original From Mexico DF chilango.com
By Colaboración ·
abc Derogatory term «…» Direct quote
… para lanzar el reclamo: “¿Cómo es posible que un entrenador joto1 (see entry 1 in the analysis) nos esté ganando?”
¿Quieres leer la nota completa? Está en la página de Chilango. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.
Leer en chilango.com (opens in a new tab)Qué cambiar y qué hace bien
Cada señalamiento dice por qué lo marcamos y cómo decirlo mejor. Cómo se calculó el 97 está en Find out more.
Very good
La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la orientación sexual, nombra a las personas no binarias, habla de diversidad sexual.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2025 Date of publication
Analyzed with Turing v3.0 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
Turing related it to what the site already knows
…“¿Cómo es posible que un entrenador joto nos esté ganando?” · Ese día de julio…See it in the text It’s a homophobic slur. Call the person by their name or “gay man”. It says
¿Es cierto lo que dice?
Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.
Turing está comparando lo que afirma la nota con el Memorial, la sección Congresos y gobiernos y verificaciones publicadas…
Is this analysis correct?
Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.
To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.
Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.
Avisar de un datoIf you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewSe ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».
The proof
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-26CQ-8MY2
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 13, 2026, 22:00:52 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
e1ec80bbec27b781fdf89465b0b07adea78eb4546d6e882d75b528d81e1ba6c2
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
La nota habla del trabajo de un congreso, pero no encontramos en ella a ninguna persona del directorio ni una iniciativa de la sección Congresos y gobiernos. Si sabes de qué iniciativa habla, elígela abajo.
Topic: Non-discrimination based on orientation or identity
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.