The whole site
Analysis of the article
El Universal · published on June 21, 2024
What happened?
Good news for the community
It reports progress in rights.
Turing says this when he reads the note.
How did the media report it?
La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans», nombra a las personas no binarias.
What is worth changing
What Can I Do?
We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-ZRGT-WSC7
Preliminary analysis: Turing has not yet finished reviewing this note and will complete it as soon as possible.
The note, in summary
1 cosa que hizo mal · 5 que hizo bien
Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en El Universal.
Citas breves de la nota de El Universal, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.
El Universal eluniversal.com.mx
By Gabriela Gabriela Martínez ·
abc Name and gender
… Civil del Estado que permite a infancias y adolescentes cambiar su sexo biológico1 (see entry 1 in the analysis) por aquel con el que se identifican en su acta de nacimiento.
Would you like to read the full article? Está en la página de El Universal. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.
Read at eluniversal.com.mx (opens in a new tab)What to change and what is working well
1 por cambiar · 5 que hace bien
Cada señalamiento dice por qué lo marcamos y cómo decirlo mejor. Cómo se calculó el 96 está en Find out more.
Very good
La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans», nombra a las personas no binarias.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2024 Date of publication
Analyzed with Turing v3.1 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
Turing related it to what the site already knows
…permite a infancias y adolescentes cambiar su sexo biológico por aquel con el que se identifican en su…See it in the text Why we flag it: According to the Supreme Court’s Protocol for adjudicating with a perspective of sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics (2022), sex is assigned at birth and gender identity is self-determined: speaking of their “true” sex denies it. Write “sex assigned at birth”, and only if it’s indispensable to the facts. It says
"It's true what he says."
1 sin comprobar
Turing compares the figures, laws, and cases it mentions with what we have documented. We don't say "false": if something doesn't add up, we show you the evidence.
The article
«Con 14 votos a favor, el Congreso del Baja California aprobó una reforma al Código Civil del Estado que permite a infancias y adolescentes cambiar su sexo biológico por aquel con el que se identifican en su acta de nacimiento.»
UnconfirmedOnly this article says it, and we didn’t find it in our records or in any other source. Until an official source or two independent media outlets confirm it, it remains unconfirmed.
See the evidenceFull Report: VR-2026-3T6TM2 · PDF. Turing compares with what we have documented (a minimum count).
Correct Turing or request a review
Is this analysis correct?
Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.
To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.
A person, a date, a figure, or a position that doesn't match. Write to us and we'll check it out.
Report a data pointIf you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewThis can be seen in “What to change and what is being done well.”
The proof
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-ZRGT-WSC7
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 13, 2026, 22:36:02 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
GHOSTARCHIVE · ghostarchive.org
Respaldada en Ghostarchive
Ghostarchive es un archivo público e independiente, sin relación con Memoria y Resistencia ni con quien publicó. Guardó its own copy de la página el 14 nov 2026, 06:39:24 (hora del centro de México). Acepta sitios que Internet Archive no guarda, como X.
Ghostarchive es un servicio de terceros. Lo usamos solo para indicar dónde está la copia; no es un aval de su parte.
953bb6ceca4769f190e859ba37e3d4164e97f0839c8ba1b8c0f321cffd6892be
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That's why every copy uses open standards that anyone can check without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin, and Ghostarchive's standalone copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
Como esta nota habla de personas legisladoras, la registramos en automático en la sección Congresses and governments. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.
Topic: Gender identity of transgender children and adolescents · Recognition of gender identity
Diputación local de Baja California · Morena
Liliana Michel Sánchez Allende In favor Speaks respectfully
What the article says (pending decision):“la inicialista Liliana Michel Sánchez Allende”
Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.
Diputación local de Baja California · Morena
Juan Manuel Molina García In favor Speaks respectfully
What the article says (pending decision):“También de Juan Manuel Molina García”
Pending decision: it did not pass all the automatic verification checks and will be decided by a third AI review as soon as an AI has quota (almost always within minutes). Meanwhile it is not published on their record nor does it count in their evaluation; the team can correct it.
Diputación local de Baja California · Morena
Alejandra María Ang Hernández No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
Diputación local de Baja California · Morena
Julia Andrea González Quiroz No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
Diputación local de Baja California · Morena
Evelyn Sánchez Sánchez No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
Diputación local de Baja California · Morena
Gloria Arcelia Miramontes Plantillas No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
Diputación local de Baja California · Morena
Dunnia Montserrat Murillo López No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.
