Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Archivo Memoria Trans México Entrevista con Terry Holiday y Emma Yessica Duvali

scielo.org.mx

The most important

What happened?

Mala noticia para nuestros derechos

It quotes words against the community. Also: it reports a disappearance.

See where it says so

Turing says this when he reads the note.

How did the media report it?

Good

La nota es respetuosa en general, con algunos detalles por mejorar. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans», nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, da voz a colectivos y activistas.

What is worth changing

  1. It says putaIt’s a misogynistic slur. If it’s a quote, make clear that it’s an expression of hate.
  2. It says pecadoIt judges from a religious belief.
  3. It says jotitosMejor: hombre gay

El 84 es por how he wrote it, not because it's good news.

What Can I Do?

What they did well and what they did wrong Leer la nota completa en scielo.org.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-TMMY-G97J

Preliminary analysis: Turing has not yet finished reviewing this note and will complete it as soon as possible.

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. What they did well and what they did wrong
  3. What to change and what is working well 5
  4. "It's true what he says." 5
  5. See a mistake?
  6. Find out more

The note, in summary

What they did well and what they did wrong

4 cosas que hizo mal · 5 que hizo bien

Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en scielo.org.mx.

What you did well

  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Remembers their family and networks
  • Uses “sex work”

and what they did wrong.

  • Nombre y género · 3 veces
  • Términos despectivos · 2 veces
  • Hostile speech
  • Imprecise terms

Qué dijo y cómo decirlo mejor

In addition, it says something that goes against our rights: we have highlighted it in amber in the sentences below.

The phrases Turing highlighted

Citas breves de la nota de scielo.org.mx, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.

scielo.org.mx

Archivo Memoria Trans México Entrevista con Terry Holiday y Emma Yessica Duvali

abc Goes against our rights abc Derogatory term abc Hostile speech abc Name and gender

… no sabía qué clase de mujer iba a ser, si iba a ser secretaria, puta1 o mesera. No lo sabía, pero cuando entré al teatro Apolo y vi esa …

… porque yo no me consideraba gay -a quienes en ese tiempo les decían jotitos3-, yo sabía que yo no quería ser como ellos porque yo no me …

… Y a los tres días me dijeron que me hablaba el judicial. Era a door5 enorme, era un gorilón. Y me dijo que si yo era el hijo de Don …

… años de la vida de mi padre fuimos los grandes amigos. Se volvió a door5 entrañable, un compañero, un cómplice y cuando se fue, quedamos …

… pensaban que saldríamos encueradas o que haríamos sexo en vivo. Pero esa era la idea que se tenía sobre lo travesti, que era pecado2.

Would you like to read the full article? Está en la página de scielo.org.mx. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.

Leer en scielo.org.mx

What to change and what is working well

What needs to be changed and what is working well

5 por cambiar · 5 que hace bien

Cada señalamiento dice por qué lo marcamos y cómo decirlo mejor. Cómo se calculó el 84 está en Find out more.

Good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language

La nota es respetuosa en general, con algunos detalles por mejorar. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans», nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, da voz a colectivos y activistas.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2022 (for the dates you mention)

Analyzed with Turing v3.1 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms Leve · 2 señalamientos · resta 13
Name and gender Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 9
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 6
Imprecise terms Mild · 1 pointing · subtraction 3

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 5 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 84 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Derogatory terms−13
  3. Name and gender−9
  4. Hostile speech−6
  5. Imprecise terms−3
  6. Gender and rights perspective+10
  7. Inclusive language+5
  8. Rating84

Esta nota nombra a una persona del registro de memoria. We check whether it names Coral Bonelli with their name and gender, as stated in the record. The legal name is never shown.

Turing related it to what the site already knows

What is worth changing

  1. Derogatory terms …mujer iba a ser, si iba a ser secretaria, puta o mesera. No lo sabía, pero cuando entré… See it in the text It’s a misogynistic slur. If it’s a quote, make clear that it’s an expression of hate.
  2. Hostile speech …que se tenía sobre lo travesti, que era pecado. · Sí, la palabra travesti les pegaba. ·… See it in the text It judges from a religious belief.
  3. Términos despectivos · en palabras de otros …gay -a quienes en ese tiempo les decían jotitos-, yo sabía que yo no quería ser como… See it in the text It’s a homophobic slur. Call the person by their name or “gay man”. It says jotitosBetter saygay man
  4. Imprecise terms …recordar que el resto pues, la mitad, se murió de VIH, y la otra mitad fue asesinada. Si estamos… Why we flag it: According to UNAIDS, people don’t die “of HIV” or “of AIDS”: they die of AIDS-related illnesses. Write “died of AIDS-related causes”. It says murió de VIHBetter saymurió por causas relacionadas con el sida
  5. Nombre y género · revisa · 3 veces …me dijeron que me hablaba el judicial. Era a door enorme, era un gorilón. Y me dijo que si… See it in the text Check whether it refers to the victim in the masculine. If she was a trans woman or travesti, use the feminine.

What it does well

  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Remembers their family and networks
  • Uses “sex work”

"It's true what he says."

Is what the note says true?

1 coincide · 1 en parte · 3 sin comprobar

Turing compares the figures, laws, and cases it mentions with what we have documented. We don't say "false": if something doesn't add up, we show you the evidence.

  1. Emma Yessica Duvali Person quoted

    «Durazo Moreno se ensañó con las mujeres trans que trabajaban en el trabajo sexual en los años 80»

    Coincide con lo que tenemos

    En la sección Congresos y gobiernos tenemos 8 iniciativas sobre discriminación en el Congreso de la Unión: 0 aprobadas, 8 en trámite y 0 rechazadas.

    See the evidence

  2. Emma Yessica Duvali Person quoted

    «En 2022 la alcaldía de Coyoacán le quitó la posibilidad de tramitar el pasaporte a Emma Yessica Duvali»

    Partly matches

    En la sección Congresos y gobiernos tenemos 5 iniciativas sobre identidad de género en Ciudad de México: 1 aprobada, 4 en trámite y 0 rechazadas. Coincide en que el congreso la aprobó; el veto del gobierno no lo registramos todavía. En nuestra tabla de leyes vigentes no tenemos una ley propia en Ciudad de México sobre…

    See the evidence

  3. Emma Yessica Duvali Person quoted

    «Emma Yessica Duvali fue secuestrada por la DIPD, estuvo un mes en el centro de detención de Tlaxcoaque, donde fue violada, rapada y violentada permanentemente»

    Unconfirmed

    Solo lo dice Emma Yessica Duvali en esta nota, y no lo encontramos en nuestros registros ni en otra fuente. Hasta que lo confirme una fuente oficial o dos medios independientes, queda sin confirmar. Turing encontró 3 publicaciones parecidas en la web y las está leyendo: si dicen lo mismo, cuentan para confirmarlo.

    See the evidence
2 cosas que todavía no podemos comprobar

  1. Terry Holiday Person quoted For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «La edad promedio de fallecimiento de la población trans en México es de 42 años»

    We still can't verify it

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  2. Emma Yessica Duvali Person quoted For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Emma Yessica Duvali lleva 25 años asistiendo a la clínica Gabriel MacGregor para recibir antirretrovirales»

    We still can't verify it

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Full Report: VR-2026-F9XJVQ · PDF. Turing compares with what we have documented (a minimum count).

See a mistake?

Correct Turing or request a review

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

One piece of information is incorrect

A person, a date, a figure, or a position that doesn't match. Write to us and we'll check it out.

Report a data point

I'm the middle child

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Find out more

Cómo se calculó el 84What remains and what is added, the Turing version, and whether an AI helped

This can be seen in “What to change and what is being done well.”

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-TMMY-G97J, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-TMMY-G97J

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 13, 2026, 22:45:31 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-TMMY-G97J Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 13, 2026, 22:45:31 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 14, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 740977c0eaa2411dd0bdc8275f62a61656f6172398fecd280cc86ae649f9e5ae

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

In the Legislatures and Governments sectionThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note

In the Memorial

This article is connected to stories we have already documented.

Other topics in the articleCrímenes de odio contra personas LGBTTTIQANB+, Violencia de género

In the cross-cutting issues

Turing reads it apart from the grade: the grade measures how it is written; this shows what counts in each topic. See all issues.

Note detailsMedium, dates, and saved versions

Data

Last analyzed
November 13, 2026
Turing
3.1 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Saved versions

  • 84Version 1 · November 13, 2026 · 5,757 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.