La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, da contexto con datos, da información útil sobre el vih.
Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en Semanario ZETA.
Lo que hizo bien
Talks about sexual diversity
Gives context with data
Gives useful information about HIV
Talks about affirmative action
Lo que hizo mal
Nada que corregir en su forma de nombrar.
Las frases que marcó Turing
Citas breves de la nota de Semanario ZETA, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.
Semanario ZETA zetatijuana.com
Morena y aliados tendrán mayoría absoluta en la XVII Legislatura
By Gilberto Santiesteban ·
abc What it does well
De acuerdo con los resultados del PREP, la lista de diputados y diputadas virtuales es la siguiente (todos …
… mil 864 votos, (37.5 por ciento); postulación por personas de la sexual diversity.
¿Quieres leer la nota completa? Está en la página de Semanario ZETA. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.
La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, da contexto con datos, da información útil sobre el vih.
Context pieceGives data, background or analysis. Strong expressions that it only describes or attributes to the press do not count.
Semanario ZETA· Observatorio de Medios · 7 notas · promedio 92 de 100
What it does well
Talks about sexual diversity
Gives context with data
Gives useful information about HIV
Talks about affirmative action
¿Es cierto lo que dice?
¿Es cierto lo que dice la nota?
Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.
Turing está comparando lo que afirma la nota con el Memorial, la sección Congresos y gobiernos y verificaciones publicadas…
See a mistake?
Is this analysis correct?
Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done)We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done)An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 13, 2026, 22:45:29 (Central Mexico time).
3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done)The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress)It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
5. Monitoring (in progress)We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Why does this make it authentic?
It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy3af5fb286ae831676b7f4d0e8f9dacf6fdbb90a12a232cde1e17790609be6314
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
En la sección Congresos y gobiernosThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note
Congresses and governments
Como esta nota habla de personas legisladoras, la registramos en automático en la sección Congresses and governments. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.
Topic: Comprehensive health, HIV and trans care
La IA está ocupada en este momento. Terminamos de revisar la nota en la siguiente revisión y el resultado aparece en la sección Congresos y gobiernos.
LA
Diputación federal · PT
Luis Armando Díaz Por leer
Turing todavía no termina de leer lo que dice: el resultado aparece aquí y en su ficha en cuanto la IA esté libre.
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Keep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.