La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans», nombra a las personas no binarias, habla de diversidad sexual. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones.
Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en Agencia Presentes.
What you did well
Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
Names non-binary people
Talks about sexual diversity
Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
Gives a voice to collectives and activists
Gives context with data
and what they did wrong.
Nothing to correct in the way you name things.
The phrases Turing highlighted
Citas breves de la nota de Agencia Presentes, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.
Agencia Presentes agenciapresentes.org
Elecciones en México: Morena no reconoce identidad de género de candidato trans en Puebla
… sino que tampoco lo considera un integrante de las poblaciones LGBT: en su record no se tomó en cuenta que es un hombre trans. En la lista de candidaturas el activist no figura en la categorÃa de affirmative actions.
Would you like to read the full article? Está en la página de Agencia Presentes. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.
La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans», nombra a las personas no binarias, habla de diversidad sexual. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Agencia Presentes· Observatorio de Medios · 74 notas · promedio 96 de 100
Who does it listen to?
Authorities1 time
Family, friends and neighborsNo
Collectives and organizationsNo
ExpertsNo
It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.
What it does well
Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
Names non-binary people
Talks about sexual diversity
Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
Gives a voice to collectives and activists
Gives context with data
Talks about affirmative action
"It's true what he says."
Is what the note says true?
1 coincide · 1 no coincide · 3 sin comprobar
Turing compares the figures, laws, and cases it mentions with what we have documented. We don't say "false": if something doesn't add up, we show you the evidence.
The article
«Morena relegó a Tuss Fernández del lugar 1 al lugar 22 en la lista de diputaciones plurinominales durante el sorteo de posiciones»
Unconfirmed
Solo lo dice esta nota, y no lo encontramos en nuestros registros ni en otra fuente. Hasta que lo confirme una fuente oficial o dos medios independientes, queda sin confirmar. Turing encontró 3 publicaciones parecidas en la web y las está leyendo: si dicen lo mismo, cuentan para confirmarlo.
«El INE determinó que lo denunciado por Tuss Fernández no configuraba violencia política en razón de género porque no es mujer»
Unconfirmed
Solo lo dice Tuss Fernández en esta nota, y no lo encontramos en nuestros registros ni en otra fuente. Hasta que lo confirme una fuente oficial o dos medios independientes, queda sin confirmar. Turing encontró 2 publicaciones parecidas en la web y las está leyendo: si dicen lo mismo, cuentan para confirmarlo.
«Ociel Baena, primera persona no binarie en ocupar una magistratura en el Poder Judicial electoral de México, fue asesinade junto a su pareja Dorian Herrera el 13 de noviembre»
«El INE tiene medidas de acción afirmativa que obligan a los partidos políticos a postular personas LGBTI+ y de otras poblaciones en posiciones competitivas»
Nuestros datos dicen otra cosa
En la sección Congresos y gobiernos tenemos 5 iniciativas sobre acciones afirmativas en el Congreso de la Unión: 0 aprobadas, 5 en trámite y 0 rechazadas. Ninguna aparece como aprobada.
«Tuss Fernández estuvo cuatro años sin documentos de identificación porque las instituciones de Puebla no reconocieron su cambio registral, realizado hace diez años en la Ciudad de México»
Unconfirmed
Solo lo dice esta nota, y no lo encontramos en nuestros registros ni en otra fuente. Hasta que lo confirme una fuente oficial o dos medios independientes, queda sin confirmar. Turing encontró 3 publicaciones parecidas en la web y las está leyendo: si dicen lo mismo, cuentan para confirmarlo.
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done)We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done)An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 13, 2026, 22:50:55 (Central Mexico time).
3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done)The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress)It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
5. Monitoring (in progress)We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Why does this make it authentic?
It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy277eb5b7ff31ba7acd619cbf7d93b3926d2eabc4953ee0d1ebdf6f1e30aeaa30
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
In the Legislatures and Governments sectionThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note
Congresses and governments
La nota habla del trabajo de un congreso, pero no encontramos en ella a ninguna persona del directorio ni una iniciativa de la sección Congresos y gobiernos. Si sabes de qué iniciativa habla, elígela abajo.
Topic: Reconocimiento de la identidad de género · Acciones afirmativas y representación política
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Keep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.