Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Reportan doble transfeminicidio en Nuevo León

24 Horas · published on July 31, 2024

The most important

What happened?

Bad news for the community

It reports a murder.

Turing says this when he reads the note.

How did the media report it?

Very good

The note does not respect the person's name or gender.

What is worth changing

  1. It says known asIf that was their name, it isn’t a nickname: use it as their name.
  2. It says image of the bodyNo publiques imágenes del cuerpo de la víctima ni de la escena. Usa una foto que ella o su familia elegirían…

El 93 es por how he wrote it, not because it's good news.

What Can I Do?

We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-ZCTX-3AYG

Preliminary analysis: Turing has not yet finished reviewing this note and will complete it as soon as possible.

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. What they did well and what they did wrong
  3. What to change and what is working well 2
  4. "It's true what he says."
  5. See a mistake?
  6. Find out more

The note, in summary

What they did well and what they did wrong

2 cosas que hizo mal · 4 que hizo bien

Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en 24 Horas.

What you did well

  • Names transfemicide
  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Remembers their family and networks

and what they did wrong.

  • Name and gender · 2 times
  • Sensationalism

Qué dijo y cómo decirlo mejor

The phrases Turing highlighted

Citas breves de la nota de 24 Horas, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.

24 Horas 24-hours.mx

Reportan doble transfeminicidio en Nuevo León

By Redacción 24 Horas ·

abc Name and gender

Johan Aldair Castillo Cruz, known as1 (see entry 1 in the analysis) Aranza Aldanelly, fue localizada sin vida a más de 20 días de ser …

Sobre el crimen de Dana Visage Enamorado, de 33 años, known as1 (see entry 1 in the analysis) ‘Española’, Casa Trans Mty no da más detalles, pero desde el …

Would you like to read the full article? Está en la página de 24 Horas. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.

Leer en 24-horas.mx (opens in a new tab)

What to change and what is working well

What needs to be changed and what is working well

2 por cambiar · 4 que hace bien

Cada señalamiento dice por qué lo marcamos y cómo decirlo mejor. Cómo se calculó el 93 está en Find out more.

Very good

  • Wrong name or gender

The note does not respect the person's name or gender.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2024 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v3.1 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from OpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 10
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism Mild · 1 pointing · subtraction 4
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 4 strengths
Inclusive language 100%

How to read this rating

  • It has a yellowish detail, shown below. They take points off, but they are not enough to call it a “sensationalist article”: that happens when sensationalism sets the tone of the whole article. In the statistics it counts among articles “with some sensationalist detail”.
  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 93 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Name and gender−10
  3. Sensationalism−4
  4. Gender and rights perspective+8
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−1
  6. Rating93

This article is a source for a case in the record. We check whether it names Paola Jaqueline with their name and gender, as stated in the record. The legal name is never shown.

Turing related it to what the site already knows

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations1 time
  • ExpertsNo

What is worth changing

  1. Name and gender · 2 times …señaló. · Johan Aldair Castillo Cruz, known as Aranza Aldanelly, fue localizada sin vida a… See it in the text If that was their name, it isn’t a nickname: use it as their name.
  2. Amarillismo · revisa Photo: Foto: Especial | Familiares y amigos reportaron su desaparición desde hace 20 días. Este lunes la localizaron sin vida. Why we flag it: The image of the body exposes the victim and their family, and adds no information. Do not publish images of the victim’s body or of the scene. Use a photo they or their family would choose, or a generic image.

What it does well

  • Names transfemicide
  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Remembers their family and networks

"It's true what he says."

Is what the note says true?

Turing lo está comparando

Turing compares the figures, laws, and cases it mentions with what we have documented. We don't say "false": if something doesn't add up, we show you the evidence.

Turing está comparando lo que afirma la nota con el Memorial, la sección Congresos y gobiernos y verificaciones publicadas…

See a mistake?

Correct Turing or request a review

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

One piece of information is incorrect

A person, a date, a figure, or a position that doesn't match. Write to us and we'll check it out.

Report a data point

I'm the middle child

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Find out more

Cómo se calculó el 93What remains and what is added, the Turing version, and whether an AI helped

This can be seen in “What to change and what is being done well.”

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-ZCTX-3AYG, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-ZCTX-3AYG

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 13, 2026, 21:36:40 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-ZCTX-3AYG Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 13, 2026, 21:36:40 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress) It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 9707096d530c4c2ee8b38b1f25700339b32663d9bc2a369bbd4e6043a1bcf55b

The link no longer opened: Turing read it from the Internet Archive copy.

In the Legislatures and Governments sectionThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note

In the Memorial

This article is connected to stories we have already documented.

Other topics in the articleCrímenes de odio contra personas LGBTTTIQANB+, Personas desaparecidas, Trabajo sexual…

In the cross-cutting issues

Turing reads it apart from the grade: the grade measures how it is written; this shows what counts in each topic. See all issues.

Note detailsMedio, fechas

Data

Outlet
24 Horas
Byline
Redacción 24 Horas
Published
July 31, 2024
Last analyzed
November 13, 2026
Turing
3.1 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.