La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el feminicidio, nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones.
Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en fonema.mx.
Lo que hizo bien
Names femicide
Names gender identity
Names sexual orientation
Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
Mentions action protocols
Includes the demand for justice
Lo que hizo mal
Nada que corregir en su forma de nombrar.
Las frases que marcó Turing
Citas breves de la nota de fonema.mx, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.
fonema.mx
Justicia para Miriam Ríos, mujer trans asesinada en Jacona
abc What it does well
Cabe hacer mención que, atendiendo el principio de la debida diligencia, la FGE lleva a cabo la investigación bajo el Protocol de Atención de la Violencia Política Contra las Mujeres en Razón de Género y el Protocol Nacional de Actuación para Personal de Instancias de Procuración de Justicia, en casos que involucren la Orientación Sexual o Identidad de Género.
¿Quieres leer la nota completa? Está en la página de fonema.mx. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.
La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el feminicidio, nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
GeminiGoogleGoogle Gemini: no need
GroqGPT-OSS de OpenAIOpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq: no need
ClaudeAnthropicClaude from Anthropic: no need
What takes points off
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
Derogatory termsNo flags
Name and genderNo flags
Blames the victimNo flags
SensationalismNo flags
Hostile speechNo flags
Imprecise termsNo flags
What adds points
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
Gender and rights perspective8 strengths
Inclusive language100%
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
Every article starts with100
Gender and rights perspective+10
Only gives voice to the authorities−3
What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−9
Rating98
Esta nota nombra a una persona del registro de memoria. We check whether it names Miriam Noemí Ríos Ríos with their name and gender, as stated in the record. The legal name is never shown.
Miriam Noemi Ríos Ríos· Directorio político · Comisionada municipal de Movimiento Ciudadano en Jacona, Michoacán · Movimiento Ciudadano
Who does it listen to?
Authorities1 time
Family, friends and neighborsNo
Collectives and organizationsNo
ExpertsNo
It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.
What it does well
Names femicide
Names gender identity
Names sexual orientation
Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
Mentions action protocols
Includes the demand for justice
Gives a voice to collectives and activists
Demands due diligence
¿Es cierto lo que dice?
¿Es cierto lo que dice la nota?
3 coinciden · 2 sin comprobar
Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.
The article
«La Fiscalía General del Estado de Michoacán inició Carpeta de investigación con relación al homicidio de Miriam Nohemí R., comisionada municipal de Movimiento Ciudadano en Jacona.»
Coincide con lo que tenemos
Lo cuentan igual esta nota y 3 medios más que no copian el mismo texto: queda confirmado por dos medios independientes.
«La activista fue privada de la vida por disparo de arma de fuego, mientras atendía un puesto comercial de su propiedad ubicado en la avenida Juárez, en la colonia La Libertad, en Zamora.»
Coincide con lo que tenemos
Lo cuentan igual esta nota y otro medio que no copian el mismo texto: queda confirmado por dos medios independientes.
«La FGE lleva a cabo la investigación bajo el Protocolo de Atención de la Violencia Política Contra las Mujeres en Razón de Género y el Protocolo Nacional de Actuación para Personal de Instancias de Procuración de Justicia, en casos que involucren la Orientación Sexual o Identidad de Género.»
Coincide con lo que tenemos
Lo cuentan igual esta nota y 3 medios más que no copian el mismo texto: queda confirmado por dos medios independientes.
«La dirigencia estatal de MC condenó el homicidio y exigió justicia.»
Unconfirmed
Only Antonio Carreño says it in this article, and we didn’t find it in our records or in any other source. Until an official source or two independent media outlets confirm it, it remains unconfirmed.
«El dirigente estatal tuvo comunicación con autoridades de la región Zamora, quienes le confirmaron que ya se iniciaron las indagatorias correspondientes y que existe la posibilidad de que se trate de un feminicidio.»
Unconfirmed
Only Antonio Carreño says it in this article, and we didn’t find it in our records or in any other source. Until an official source or two independent media outlets confirm it, it remains unconfirmed.
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done)We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done)An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 14, 2026, 13:04:26 (Central Mexico time).
3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done)The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress)It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
5. Monitoring (done)It was still online on November 14, 2026. We check it from time to time.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Why does this make it authentic?
It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
SHA-256 fingerprint of the copyd52e9491ea0084b607b8f3614e6d96eb2ea0ac647b67a5864953b6141bbb0822
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
En la sección Congresos y gobiernosThe initiative and the legislators that Turing linked to the note
In the Memorial
This article is connected to stories we have already documented.
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Keep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.