The whole site
Legislative Observatory · LXIV Legislature (2024–2027)
Each initiative, point of agreement and positioning on the rights of LGBTTTIQANB + people in the LXIV Legislature of the Congress of the State of Guerrero: who presented it, what commission it reached and how long it has been waiting.
Directorio del Congreso Official website (opens in another tab) Transparency 55/100 · Low Whole country
This is the traffic light today
Records last updated: October 17, 2026
Each instrument with the time it has been in Congress. The 30 and 50 business days marks indicate when a bill starts to lag and when we consider it in the freezer. How we calculate it.
Showing 7 of 7 instruments that match your search.
In the freezer Bill · presented on October 22, 2024
Iniciativa de decreto por el que se adiciona el artículo 135 Bis al Código Penal para el Estado Libre y Soberano de Guerrero Número 499, para tipificar el transfeminicidio.
533 business days without a committee report
In the freezer Bill · presented on March 25, 2026
Iniciativa de decreto por el que se adiciona el artículo 351 Bis (y 353 Bis) al Código Civil del Estado Libre y Soberano de Guerrero Número 358.
162 business days without a committee report
In the freezer Bill · presented on April 8, 2026
Iniciativa de decreto por el que se reforman y adicionan diversas disposiciones a la Ley Orgánica de la Fiscalía General del Estado de Guerrero, Número 500, para crear la Fiscalía…
152 business days without a committee report
In the freezer Bill · presented on May 5, 2026
Iniciativa de decreto por el que se adiciona la fracción XXXV al artículo 195 de la Ley Orgánica del Poder Legislativo del Estado de Guerrero Número 231.
133 business days without a committee report
In the freezer Bill · presented on June 2, 2026
Iniciativa de decreto por el que se reforma el artículo 65 de la Ley Número 688 de Personas Jóvenes del Estado de Guerrero, en materia de derecho a la identidad, libre desarrollo de la…
113 business days without a committee report
In process Bill · presented on October 6, 2026
Iniciativa de decreto por el que se reforman las fracciones XXI y XXII y se adiciona la fracción XXIII al artículo 26, así como un artículo 42 Quáter a la Ley Orgánica de la Administración…
23 business days without a committee report
Presenting is not the same as achieving. An approved reform changes the law; an exhortation only asks. That is why we separate each type of instrument and evaluate results, not just quantity. We count only what this observatory follows, not all of Congress’s activity.
10 - on f-up 3 approved · 5 in the freezer
They propose creating or changing a law, a code or the Constitution. If they are passed and published, they bind every authority. It’s the instrument with the greatest reach and the hardest to push through: it needs a committee report and a vote of the Plenary.
1 - on f-up 1 approved
They ask an authority to do something or set out a position of the Congress. They don’t change any law or bind anyone legally: their force is political. They tend to pass more easily, sometimes the same day.
6 being tracked
Statements from the floor or in the media. They put a position on record, but they aren’t voted on and have no legal effect.
Legislative work or simulation? Presenting many exhortations and position statements without a single bill, or presenting bills and leaving them in the freezer, gives visibility but does not change rights. Pushing a bill forward is also the responsibility of whoever presents it: lobbying the committee, asking for a report and securing the votes. That is why we mark these signs in the evaluation.
Presenting a proposal is easy; getting it approved takes work: convincing the committee, asking for it to be reviewed and securing the votes.
This is how it is ranked: 1) more laws passed; 2) if tied, more achievement points (each proposal adds its weight according to its outcome: an approved new law or constitutional amendment is worth 3, an approved amendment 2, an approved exhortation 1; those that move forward add a part); 3) if they are still tied, the better rating. The rating (from 0 to 100) measures effectiveness: how well what they submitted fared, on average.
Marisol Bazán FernándezLGBTTTIQANB+ affirmative action
1 of 1 bill passed · 1 exhortation passed
1 law passed · 4 achievement points
Drives constitutional reforms or new laws1 out of 1 bill passed
1 law passed · 3 achievement points
Drives constitutional reforms or new lawsGloria Citlali Calixto JiménezAffirmative action LGBTTTIQANB+ · bisexual
1 out of 1 bill passed
1 law passed · 3 achievement points
Drives constitutional reforms or new laws1 of 2 bills approved
1 law passed · 3 achievement points
Drives constitutional reforms or new lawsSubmitting is not enough: you also have to lobby the committee and get the votes. Here are those who have proposals that passed the legal deadline without review and none approved, and those who submitted proposals that look like a sham. Letting something freeze is not the same as being against: that is why they are in yellow, except for shams, which are flagged separately. Whoever fakes support does not appear among the best-rated people. Number 1 is the one with the most frozen proposals. 4 people in total, 4 with all their proposals frozen.
See the full methodology, with examples and academic sources
1. Not all proposals are worth the same. An amendment to the Constitution or a new law weighs 3; an amendment to a law or code, 2; an exhortation or point of agreement, 1; and a position statement, 0.5. It is an adaptation of the Multidimensional Index of Significance (Bárcena, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 2019), which distinguishes high-impact proposals from symbolic ones.
2. What happened to each one matters. Approved adds 100; reviewed by the committee, 60; on time, 35; delayed, 15; rejected, 5; and frozen, 0. The rating is the average, giving each proposal the weight of its significance. Position statements are not voted on, so they are not included in the rating.
3. Colors. Green: achieves results. Blue: their proposals move forward. Yellow: submitted, but their proposals are frozen or stalled (a lack of push, not necessarily bad faith). Red: submitted or backed proposals against of LGBTTTIQANB+ rights. Gray: stayed silent, without submitting or backing anything.
4. Allies who drive and allies who support. Submitting a proposal is worth twice as much as signing it in support. Those who submit bills champion the agenda; those who only sign, submit exhortations or take a position support it.
70 or more: effective · 45 to 69: moving forward · 25 to 44: waiting · less than 25: submitted, no progress. We only count proposals on LGBTTTIQANB+ rights followed by this observatory, not all their legislative work. We measure progress in Congress; whether a law is then fulfilled in people’s lives requires an impact evaluation ex post like the one proposed by Transparencia Mexicana (2023).
First those who got their bills approved; then, by rating. Only instruments the person presented count (not sign-ons). “Approved” means the Plenary voted for it by majority or it has already been published.
| Person | Bills | Approved for them | Reports | Stalled | Exhortations | Stat. | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gloria Citlali Calixto Jiménez Morena | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 4 | 100/100 · Cash |
| Marisol Bazán Fernández Morena | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1) | 0 | 100/100 · Cash |
| Alejandro Bravo Abarca PRI | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 100/100 · Cash |
| Luissana Ramos Pineda Morena | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 | 60/100 · Advance |
| Araceli Ocampo Manzanares Morena | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 3 | |
| Diana Bernabé Vega Morena All of their bills are in the freezer |
2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 | |
| Erika Isabel Guillén Román PRD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 (0) | 1 | |
| Erika Lorena Lührs Cortés Movimiento Ciudadano | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 (0) | 1 | |
| Pablo Amilcar Sandoval Ballesteros Morena | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 | |
| Beatriz Vélez Núñez PRI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 1 | No proposals put to a vote |
| Gladys Cortés Genchi Verde | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 1 | No proposals put to a vote |
| Víctor Hugo Vega Hernández PRI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 1 | No proposals put to a vote |
Instruments in which the person appears as author or co-author.
Araceli Ocampo Manzanares Morena
5 instruments introduced
5 instruments introduced
Diana Bernabé Vega Morena
2 instruments introduced
2 instruments introduced
Erika Lorena Lührs Cortés Movimiento Ciudadano
2 instruments introduced
Luissana Ramos Pineda Morena
2 instruments introduced
Marisol Bazán Fernández Morena
2 instruments introduced
1 instrument introduced
Sign-ons: legislators who signed in support of an instrument presented by someone else.
No sign-ons recorded.
Each instrument counts once for each party of its authors and once for each party that signed on. The same instrument can add to several parties.
| Party | Introduced | Endorsements |
|---|---|---|
| Morena | 13 | 0 |
| PRI | 3 | 0 |
| Movimiento Ciudadano | 2 | 0 |
| PRD | 2 | 0 |
| Verde | 1 | 0 |
Who has put their name in favor of our rights in this congress, and who against.
Drives: introduced bills in favor. Supports: submitted exhortations or position statements, or spoke out in favor publicly. Signed without speaking out: signed in support, but did not submit anything or speak out in favor publicly; signing or voting is not enough to be an ally. Not an ally: submitted or backed at least one proposal against, or spoke out against publicly. Fakes support: signed or submitted in favor, but speaks out against publicly. Silence: in office, without introducing or backing any proposal on these rights.
Ranked by points: each proposal in favor adds its weight (3, 2, 1 or 0.5 depending on its scope) and is worth half if they only signed it in support.
Araceli Ocampo Manzanares Drives
Presented 2 bills · 3 exhortations or positions · 6,5 pts
Luissana Ramos Pineda Drives
Introduced 2 bills · 5 pts
Gloria Citlali Calixto JiménezAffirmative action LGBTTTIQANB+ · bisexual Drives
Presented 1 bill · 4 exhortations or positions · 5 pts
Diana Bernabé Vega Drives
Introduced 2 bills · 4 pts
Marisol Bazán FernándezLGBTTTIQANB+ affirmative action Drives
Presented 1 bill · 1 exhortation or positioning · 4 pts
Erika Lorena Lührs Cortés Drives
Presented 1 bill · 1 exhortation or positioning · 3,5 pts
Alejandro Bravo Abarca Drives
Introduced 1 bill · 3 pts
Erika Isabel Guillén Román Drives
Presented 1 bill · 1 exhortation or positioning · 2,5 pts
Pablo Amilcar Sandoval Ballesteros Drives
Introduced 1 bill · 2 pts
Beatriz Vélez Núñez Supports
Submitted 1 exhortation or positioning · 0,5 pts
Gladys Cortés Genchi Supports
Submitted 1 exhortation or positioning · 0,5 pts
Víctor Hugo Vega Hernández Supports
Submitted 1 exhortation or positioning · 0,5 pts
We have not recorded proposals against rights in what we track.
They neither submitted nor signed in support of any proposal, not even on difficult issues. Silence is also a position.
“No party”: deputies with no party or parliamentary group, or with no party in the official document. Independent candidacies are counted separately. Tap a party to see its profile.
We only count proposals on LGBTTTIQANB+ rights followed by this observatory and the support signatures recorded on them; Plenary votes are not included.
Who holds a seat through affirmative action or identifies as part of the community, and whether their actions match that representation.
An affirmative action is a temporary measure that opens a space for a historically discriminated group to correct that inequality. We monitor that this space is used: whoever came in that way should champion or at least support proposals in favor of our rights. How we measure it.
They introduced bills in favor of our rights.
Gloria Citlali Calixto Jiménez
5 in favor · 5 pts
2 in favor · 4 pts
It is flagged when a person who arrived through affirmative action accumulates 2 or more different signals. It is an alert to watch, not a verdict: several challenged people were upheld by the courts.
We never use stereotypes (marital status, appearance or gender expression) as a signal.
We only include those whom the electoral authority registered through affirmative action or who publicly identified themselves; we never assume it. “Voted against” appears only when a public source documents the vote, because most congresses do not publish their roll-call votes.
Affirmative actions stem from INE agreements and Electoral Tribunal rulings (INE/CG18/2021, INE/CG527/2023, SUP-JDC-338/2023, INE/CG625/2023) and their state equivalents. See the agreements · Is someone missing or is there an error?
Contamos los días hábiles (de lunes a viernes) desde que un instrumento se presenta hasta que la comisión lo dictamina. Señalamos rezago a los 30 y congeladora a los 50.
Legal basis: Ley Orgánica del Poder Legislativo del Estado de Guerrero Núm. 231, art. 279: las iniciativas y asuntos turnados deben dictaminarse en un plazo no mayor a 30 días hábiles a partir del día siguiente a la recepción del turno; por trascendencia o complejidad la Mesa Directiva puede otorgar un plazo mayor que no excederá de 20 días hábiles (las comisiones también pueden pedir, dentro de los 10 días hábiles posteriores al turno, ampliación de hasta la mitad del plazo); los días hábiles incluyen recesos. Arts. 281-283: excitativa y reasignación de turno al vencer plazo y prórroga. Última reforma de la Ley: P.O. No. 38 Alcance III, 12 de mayo de 2026 (art. 279 reformado P.O. 33 Alc. III, 23-04-2021 y P.O. 47 Alc. I, 13-06-2025). See the law (opens in another tab)
Current text consulted: latest reform published on May 12, 2026.
We record each piece of data from the Gazette and Congress’s official documents. If you find an error, write to us. How much does each congress publish? See the transparency index.
The plenary approved it or it was already published.
The committee has already issued its report; the Plenary still has to vote or the process has to conclude.
It has 30 business days or less since it was introduced and hasn’t been reported on yet.
More than 50 business days without a committee report: it is stalled.
The process ended without approval.
Find out who sits on each committee, what bills they have pending and how to contact them.
