All the statistics in one place
Data open
Memory and Resistance figures in one place: the cases we document, how the media speak and what the congresses do. Choose what to see, compare years, or build your own chart. Behind every number there is a person with a name: learn their story in the memorial.
What are congresses doing for our rights?
Figures for Legislative observatory: how many proposals are submitted, how many are approved, and how many are left in the freezer.
- proposals we track
- 586
- congresses
- 34
- approved
- 153
- stalled
- 286
- bills
- 410
- with citizen participation
- 27
Where each proposal stands
The traffic light for all proposals (not counting statements).
See the data table
| Traffic light | Proposals |
|---|---|
| Approved | 153 |
| With committee report | 14 |
| In process | 33 |
| No committee report (more than 120 days) | 33 |
| Stalled (more than 180 days) | 286 |
| Rejected or dismissed | 30 |
Performance of each congress
From 0 to 100: how far your proposals are progressing. As you hover you see how many there are.
Year by year: what is introduced and what is approved
The bars are the proposals presented each year, by type; the line, those that were approved that year.
See the data table
| Year | Bills | Points of agreement | Statements | Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 140 | 58 | 12 | 79 |
| 2025 | 209 | 68 | 20 | 73 |
| 2024 | 50 | 10 | 5 | 12 |
The last 24 months
Proposals introduced each month in all congresses.
See the data table
| Month | Bills | Points of agreement | Statements | Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2026-09 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 2026-08 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-07 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 2026-06 | 20 | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| 2026-05 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 2026-04 | 19 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 2026-03 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 29 |
| 2026-02 | 17 | 22 | 0 | 5 |
| 2026-01 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025-12 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 2025-11 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 2025-10 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025-09 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 2025-08 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025-07 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 2025-06 | 33 | 11 | 6 | 16 |
| 2025-05 | 23 | 10 | 7 | 11 |
| 2025-04 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 3 |
| 2025-03 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025-02 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025-01 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2024-12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 2024-11 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Compare two congresses
Choose two congresses and see them side by side.
| Figure | Chamber of Deputies of the Mexican Congress | Senate of the Republic |
|---|---|---|
| Proposals we track | 75 | 46 |
| Bills | 54 | 44 |
| Points of agreement | 21 | 2 |
| Approved | 1 | 28 |
| Approved, as a percentage | 1% | 61% |
| Stalled | 61 | 17 |
| Stalled, as a percentage | 81% | 37% |
| Average days unresolved | 177 | 337 |
| Performance (from 0 to 100) | 6 | 61 |
| Sitting legislators | 541 | 149 |
All congresses
| Congress | Proposals | Approved | Stalled | Days unresolved | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chamber of Deputies of the Mexican Congress | 75 | 1 (1%) | 61 (81%) | 177 | 6 |
| Senate of the Republic | 46 | 28 (61%) | 17 (37%) | 337 | 61 |
| Aguascalientes | 10 | 0 (0%) | 4 (40%) | 551 | 3 |
| Baja California | 12 | 6 (60%) | 3 (30%) | 135 | 62 |
| Baja California Sur | 14 | 5 (42%) | 6 (50%) | 415 | 42 |
| Campeche | 3 | 2 (67%) | 1 (33%) | 203 | 67 |
| Chiapas | 16 | 6 (100%) | 0 (0%) | – | 100 |
| Chihuahua | 8 | 0 (0%) | 7 (88%) | 643 | 1 |
| Mexico City | 96 | 27 (29%) | 61 (66%) | 253 | 31 |
| Coahuila de Zaragoza | 7 | 3 (43%) | 4 (57%) | 569 | 43 |
| Colima | 5 | 3 (75%) | 0 (0%) | – | 76 |
| Durango | 9 | 3 (38%) | 3 (38%) | 396 | 46 |
| State of Mexico | 8 | 3 (38%) | 0 (0%) | – | 63 |
| Guanajuato | 26 | 4 (15%) | 4 (15%) | 318 | 33 |
| Guerrero | 17 | 4 (36%) | 5 (45%) | 161 | 43 |
| Hidalgo | 19 | 6 (35%) | 10 (59%) | 304 | 36 |
| Jalisco | 14 | 2 (15%) | 4 (31%) | 529 | 22 |
| Michoacán de Ocampo | 22 | 4 (19%) | 11 (52%) | 261 | 24 |
| Morelos | 11 | 3 (27%) | 5 (45%) | 353 | 41 |
| Nayarit | 2 | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 692 | 50 |
| Nuevo León | 11 | 0 (0%) | 3 (27%) | 372 | 7 |
| Oaxaca | 14 | 3 (21%) | 9 (64%) | 188 | 24 |
| Puebla | 47 | 15 (32%) | 26 (55%) | 339 | 36 |
| Querétaro | 5 | 2 (40%) | 1 (20%) | 693 | 59 |
| Quintana Roo | 6 | 2 (33%) | 4 (67%) | 307 | 33 |
| San Luis Potosí | 14 | 2 (17%) | 2 (17%) | 286 | 40 |
| Sinaloa | 17 | 1 (6%) | 8 (47%) | 275 | 13 |
| Sonora | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 24 | 35 |
| Tabasco | 5 | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) | 513 | 0 |
| Tamaulipas | 17 | 10 (59%) | 6 (35%) | 383 | 62 |
| Tlaxcala | 9 | 0 (0%) | 9 (100%) | 461 | 0 |
| Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave | 9 | 2 (33%) | 4 (67%) | 76 | 33 |
| Yucatán | 7 | 4 (57%) | 1 (14%) | 164 | 67 |
| Zacatecas | 4 | 1 (25%) | 3 (75%) | 374 | 25 |
Go to the Legislative observatory How each party votes Organized civil society
How to read these figures
The Legislative observatory follows the initiatives, points of agreement and positions on LGBTTTIQANB + rights in the Congress of the Union and in the congresses of the States.
Each proposal has a traffic light: approved, ruled, pending, without ruling in time, in the freezer (passed the legal deadline without ruling) or closed. The performance of each congress ranges from 0 to 100 and uses the same weights as the rating of each legislator. More details in the Observatory methodology.
Use the data
Las gráficas y tablas de esta página son libres: puedes usarlas, descargarlas como imagen y compartirlas. Los datos se publican con licencia CC BY 4.0: cite Memoria y Resistencia.
- Create your account or sign in with it.
- Answer the starting questionnaire. With that you can already use the figures in JSON with your personal key.
- Request the CSV de los casos y cuéntanos para qué lo usarás. Cuando lo autoricemos, el enlace aparece en Mi cuenta.