The essentials
Very good writing
Backed up and certified CC-GBHT-EAAS
The article uses respectful language. It does not name the person’s identity or the context of bias-motivated violence. The text is short: take the result as guidance.
- No expressions to change
- See where we found it
- Analyzed
- November 6, 2026
- State
- Online
What Turing analyzed
Where we found it
Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la publicación completa. Los demás subrayados son detalles de redacción; el número lleva a su explicación en el análisis. Toca o pasa el mouse sobre una marca para ver por qué la señalamos.
abc Inclusive language
Luis Fernando Ferra Aguilar está en Facebook. Únete a Facebook para conectar con Luis Fernando Ferra Aguilar y otras personas que tal vez conozcas. Facebook da a la gente el poder de compartir y...
How it was rated
The full analysis
What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the post listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.
Very good
- Respectful
The article uses respectful language. It does not name the person’s identity or the context of bias-motivated violence. The text is short: take the result as guidance.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Year unknown: we rate it with today’s language.
Analyzed with Turing v2.1 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
- Google Gemini: no need
- OpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq: no need
- Claude from Anthropic: no need
What takes points off
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What adds points
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
How we arrived at 92 out of 100
- Every article starts with100
- Does not name the identity or the context−8
- Rating92
This article is a source for a case in the record. We check whether it names Luis Fernando Ferra Aguilar with their name and gender, as stated in the record. The legal name is never shown.
Turing la relacionó con lo que ya sabe el sitio
- Luis Fernando Ferra Aguilar · Registro de memoria
Who speaks
Legislative observatory
The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the post.
In the Memorial
This article is connected to stories we have already documented.
- It is the source of the Luis Fernando Ferra Aguilar.
The proof
Certified copy
Proof that this post existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-GBHT-EAAS
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 6, 2026, 20:05:09 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
- 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read (text, account, date and images) and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
- 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 6, 2026, 20:05:09 (Central Mexico time).
- 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
- 4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress) It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
- 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Backed up on archive.org
Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 7, 2026, 04:22 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.
Why does this make it authentic?
- It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
- The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
- Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
- It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
- Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
0cd1f374ae67acf990c916fb5ca2be22cf10b62c5db13484f842b4c0350dcd15
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
What is it worth as evidence?
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
Record
Sobre la publicación
Data
- Last analyzed
- November 6, 2026
- Turing
- 2.1 (the current one)
- State
- Online
- Place of the events
- Mexico
Saved versions
- 92Version 1 · November 6, 2026 · 34 words
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Are you from the outlet?
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewKeep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.