Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Congreso de Yucatán deroga el delito de “peligro de contagio” y refuerza derechos de personas con VIH

PorEsto! · published on October 1, 2026

The essentials

Very good

Backed up and certified CC-2PPS-XEYF

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, enfoque de derechos humanos, da voz a colectivos y activistas.

Outlet
PorEsto!
Published
October 1, 2026
Analyzed
November 5, 2026
State
Online
Leer en poresto.com PDF

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The full analysis

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, enfoque de derechos humanos, da voz a colectivos y activistas.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.0 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 8
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 6 strengths
Inclusive language 100%

How to read this rating

  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 96 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Blames the victim−8
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. Inclusive language+5
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−11
  6. Rating96

Turing la relacionó con lo que ya sabe el sitio

What is worth changing

  1. Blames the victim …representan sólo una parte de las acciones necesarias para atender a las personas que viven con VIH, por lo que llamó a respaldarlas con recursos suficientes, particularmente durante la próxima… Why we flag it: The Supreme Court’s Notes on prejudice-motivated crimes (2024) and its Protocol for adjudicating with a perspective of sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics (2022) ask not to use the health status of an LGBTTTIQANB+ person, real or assumed, to justify violence or to stop investigating. Their health status doesn’t explain or justify the violence. If it isn’t relevant, leave it out.

What it does well

  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Offers a contact for help or institutions
  • Uses “person living with HIV”
  • Gives useful information about HIV

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Legislative observatory

The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the article.

Legislative observatory

Como esta nota habla de una iniciativa y de personas legisladoras, la registramos en automático en el Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Comprehensive health, HIV and trans care

  • Bill · Yucatán

    Derogar el delito de peligro de contagio y medidas a favor de la diversidad sexual

    La IA encontró que la nota habla de esta iniciativa. La nota ya aparece en su página.

    See the bill

  • Diputación local de Yucatán · Morena

    Clara Paola Rosales Montiel No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Yucatán · PAN

    Itzel Falla Uribe No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Yucatán · PRI

    Gaspar Armando Quintal Parra No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

Other voices in the article

  • Government

    Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Estado de Yucatán (Codhey) In favor Speaks respectfully

    “la propuesta fue construida con organizaciones de la sociedad civil y organismos de derechos humanos, incluida la Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Estado de Yucatán (Codhey).”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill

  • Another voice

    Comité Estatal de Diversidad Sexual In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Integrantes del Comité Estatal de Diversidad Sexual reconocieron el trabajo legislativo y señalaron que el VIH no debe ser motivo de estigma, discriminación ni persecución penal.”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill

  • Another voice

    Organizaciones de la sociedad civil que acompañan a personas que viven con VIH In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Ante activistas y representantes de organizaciones que acompañan a personas que viven con VIH, las distintas fracciones legislativas respaldaron la modificación y reconocieron el trabajo de la sociedad civil.”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

Habla de esta iniciativa

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs of the article where we found something, without reproducing it in full. Each underline style is a type of finding; the number refers to the list above. Hover over or tap a mark to see why we flagged it.

abc Blames the victim abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

… del delito de “peligro de contagio” del Código Penal de Yucatán, así como modificaciones al marco legal para reforzar la protección de los derechos de las personas que viven con VIH y combatir la discriminación. El dictamen, aprobado ayer por el Pleno, modifica la Ley para la Prevención y Control del Virus de Inmunodeficiencia Humana, Síndrome …

… relacionados con la no discriminación. La reforma elimina el artículo 189 del Código Penal, que contemplaba el llamado “delito de peligro de contagio”. Ante activistas y representantes de organizaciones que acompañan a personas que viven con VIH, las distintas fracciones legislativas respaldaron la modificación y reconocieron el trabajo de la sociedad civil que durante años impulsó cambios al marco jurídico estatal. Durante la discusión, la diputada Clara Paola Rosales Montiel destacó que la propuesta fue construida con organizaciones de la sociedad civil y organismos de procedures, incluida la Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Estado de Yucatán (Codhey). “Vivir con VIH no es un delito y nunca debe ser motivo de discriminación. No podemos seguir permitiendo que el estigma, los prejuicios y la criminalización se conviertan en obstáculos para que the people puedan vivir con dignidad y ejercer plenamente sus procedures”, puntualizó la legisladora de Morena. La derogación del artículo 189 elimina el llamado “delito de peligro de contagio”; sin embargo, el dictamen establece …

… del Código Penal. Por su parte, la diputada Itzel Falla Uribe, del PAN, señaló que las reformas representan sólo una parte de las acciones necesarias para atender a the people que viven con VIH, por lo que llamó a respaldarlas con recursos suficientes, particularmente durante la próxima discusión del presupuesto estatal. El diputado Gaspar Quintal Parra, del PRI, destacó que las modificaciones representan un avance para evitar actos de discriminación contra the people con VIH en la atención médica y en el acceso a otros servicios y apoyos. El VIH ataca el sistema inmunitario y, sin tratamiento, puede evolucionar hasta el sida. Actualmente no existe una cura, pero los medicamentos antirretrovirales permiten controlar la infección y llevar una vida larga y saludable. Además, cuando una persona mantiene una carga viral indetectable mediante tratamiento, no transmite el VIH por vía sexual. Tras la aprobación, organismos y asociaciones se pronunciaron a favor de las reformas. Integrantes del Comité Estatal de Diversidad Sexual reconocieron el trabajo legislativo y señalaron que el VIH no debe ser motivo de estigma, discriminación ni persecución penal. La modificación forma parte de un proceso legislativo que comenzó con iniciativas orientadas a actualizar el marco jurídico estatal en materia de VIH, procedures y no discriminación.

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-2PPS-XEYF

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 6, 2026, 12:20:54 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-2PPS-XEYF Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 6, 2026, 12:20:54 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 3c9a59b88580601148d01c4e125e719722ebd01a72ca01f1373eb7cb63056a32

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

About the note

Data

Outlet
PorEsto!
Byline
Alejandro Febles
Published
October 1, 2026
Last analyzed
November 5, 2026
Turing
2.0 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 96Version 1 · November 5, 2026 · 462 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.