Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Instituto presentó el protocolo de género y acción institucional

institutoacc.com.ar

The essentials

Very good

The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.

Analyzed
November 6, 2026
State
Online

Share this analysis

The full analysis

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2025 (por las fechas que menciona)

Analyzed with Turing v1.6.6 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 3 strengths
Inclusive language Not applicable
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+6
  3. Only gives voice to the authorities−3
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−5
  5. Rating98

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities1 vez
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • ExpertsNo

It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Mentions action protocols

What the article says, fact-checked

Al analizar la nota, Turing revisa las cifras, leyes y casos que afirma y lo que dicen las organizaciones, personas legisladoras y autoridades que cita, y los compara con el Memorial, el Observatorio Legislativo y verificaciones publicadas.

Turing está comparando lo que afirma la nota con el Memorial, el Observatorio Legislativo y verificaciones publicadas…

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs of the article where we found something, without reproducing it in full. Each underline style is a type of finding; the number refers to the list above. Hover over or tap a mark to see why we flagged it.

abc What it does well

Instituto presentó el protocolo de género y acción institucional

La jornada se llevó a cabo en el Estadio Ángel Sandrín y marcó un antes y un después en la historia albirroja: el club sumó una herramienta fundamental para saber cómo prevenir, atender y sancionar las situaciones de violencia y discriminación por razones de género, orientación sexual e gender identity.

La presentación del plan de acción va mucho más allá de dicha introducción en sí y de quienes integran a La Gloria: en cada disciplina hay familias detrás y hay necesidades que atender y escuchar, por ende, Instituto como club de puertas abiertas, asume el compromiso de aplicar y hacer cumplir en todas y cada una de sus partes el presente Protocol.

About the note

Data

Last analyzed
November 6, 2026
Turing
1.6.6 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 98Version 1 · November 6, 2026 · 217 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.