The essentials
Very good writing
Backed up and certified CC-7EJF-BBQ9
The article uses respectful language. It does not name the person’s identity or the context of bias-motivated violence.
- No expressions to change
- Outlet
- El Mañana de Reynosa
- Published
- January 13, 2019
- Analyzed
- November 6, 2026
- State
- Online
The full analysis
What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.
Very good
- Respectful
The article uses respectful language. It does not name the person’s identity or the context of bias-motivated violence.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2019 Date of publication
Analyzed with Turing v2.1 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
- Google Gemini: no need
- OpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq: no need
- Claude from Anthropic: no need
What takes points off
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What adds points
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
How we arrived at 92 out of 100
- Every article starts with100
- Does not name the identity or the context−8
- Rating92
Turing la relacionó con lo que ya sabe el sitio
- elmanana.com · Observatorio de Medios · 3 notas · promedio 62 de 100
Who does it listen to?
- Authorities1 vez
- Family, friends and neighbors1 vez
- Collectives and organizationsNo
- ExpertsNo
What the article says, fact-checked
In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.
Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...
Certified copy
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-7EJF-BBQ9
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 6, 2026, 17:06:01 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
- 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
- 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 6, 2026, 17:06:01 (Central Mexico time).
- 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
- 4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress) It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
- 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Why does this make it authentic?
- It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
- The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
- Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
- It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
- Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
ffc817390669036bc07a72c3b75670ef18794b5cc40c5c9d24d045d2e87bad02
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
What is it worth as evidence?
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
About the note
Data
- Outlet
- El Mañana de Reynosa
- Byline
- David Silva
- Published
- January 13, 2019
- Last analyzed
- November 6, 2026
- Turing
- 2.1 (the current one)
- State
- Online
Saved versions
- 92Version 1 · November 6, 2026 · 212 words
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Are you from the outlet?
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewKeep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.