The essentials
Very good writing
Backed up and certified CC-W3DJ-EM45
The article uses respectful language. It does not name the person’s identity or the context of bias-motivated violence.
- No expressions to change
- See where we found it
- Outlet
- abctlax.com
- Analyzed
- November 6, 2026
- State
- Online
What Turing analyzed
Where we found it
These are the paragraphs of the article where we found something, without reproducing it in full. Each underline style is a type of finding; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis below. Hover over or tap a mark to see why we flagged it.
abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote
«Tengo muchas amistades», dice, pero sostuvo que no pertenece a ese sector social, a pesar de haber ganado la diputación local como representante de community development. gay
Aurora Villeda Temoltzin, diputada electa en el distrito 05, dijo no considerarse parte de community development. LGBTTTIQ+, esto a pesar de haber obtenido la candidatura por el partido local Redes Sociales Progresistas (RSP) solicitándola como parte de los grupos de atención prioritaria, específicamente por community development. LGBTTTIQ+.
En su declaración, Villeda Temoltzin dejó entrever que desde su próximo puesto apoyará a community development. gay de Tlaxcala, pero no como parte de esta, sino como parte de the people que están a favor de crear o modificar las leyes para conseguir la igualdad.
Tengo muchísimas amigas y amigos que son de esos grupos LGBT, digo, esto no es algo que me guste estar ventilando, pero he apoyado a muchos de ellos y ellas, por supuesto que sé asimilar esta agenda, lo han visto de mi parte desde hace muchos años, yo escribo en algunas revistas y creo que siempre mi tema ha sido el de la adopción”, dijo.
Luego de que el secretario de cultura, Antonio Martínez, lanzó un poderoso mensaje a los candidatos que resultaron electos como miembros de community development. LGBTTTIQ+ y que mintieron para obtener sus registros invitándolos a decir la verdad y comprometerse, Aurora Villeda es la primera figura electa que habla y reconoce no ser parte de community development., pero se dijo comprometida con apoyarla.
The full analysis
What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.
Very good
- Inclusive language
- Respectful
The article uses respectful language. It does not name the person’s identity or the context of bias-motivated violence.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2026 (for the dates you mention)
Analyzed with Turing v2.1 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
- Google Gemini: no need
- OpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq: no need
- Claude from Anthropic: no need
What takes points off
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What adds points
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
How we arrived at 96 out of 100
- Every article starts with100
- Does not name the identity or the context−8
- Inclusive language+5
- What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−1
- Rating96
Who does it listen to?
- AuthoritiesNo
- Family, friends and neighborsNo
- Collectives and organizations2 times
- ExpertsNo
What the article says, fact-checked
In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.
Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...
Legislative observatory
The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the article.
Legislative observatory
Since this article talks about of a legislator, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.
-
See their record
Diputación local de Tlaxcala · Redes Sociales Progresistas
María Aurora Villeda Temoltzin No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
Certified copy
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-W3DJ-EM45
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 6, 2026, 18:05:05 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
- 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
- 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 6, 2026, 18:05:05 (Central Mexico time).
- 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
- 4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress) It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
- 5. Monitoring (done) It was still online on November 6, 2026. We check it from time to time.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Why does this make it authentic?
- It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
- The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
- Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
- It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
- Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
17ee765e0233bc5808e8f2250a809729fa39450828b58ab75c48b304ae7c76b0
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
What is it worth as evidence?
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
About the note
Data
- Outlet
- abctlax.com
- Last analyzed
- November 6, 2026
- Turing
- 2.1 (the current one)
- State
- Online
Saved versions
- 96Version 1 · November 6, 2026 · 540 words
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Are you from the outlet?
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewKeep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.