The essentials
Very good writing
Backed up and certified CC-BKSH-E7NA
The article uses respectful language. The text is short: take the result as guidance.
- No expressions to change
- 2 things it does well
- See where we found it
- Account
- @transcontinenta · Instagram
- Analyzed
- November 6, 2026
- State
- Online
What Turing analyzed
Where we found it
These are the paragraphs of the article where we found something, without reproducing it in full. Each underline style is a type of finding; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis below. Hover over or tap a mark to see why we flagged it.
abc What it does well «…» Direct quote
54 likes, 3 comments - transcontingenta el September 16, 2024: "51ava trans woman de la que tenemos registro as231da en 2024. “La China” fue encontrada ej3
The full analysis
What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the post listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.
Very good
- Respectful
The article uses respectful language. The text is short: take the result as guidance.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2024 (for the dates you mention)
Analyzed with Turing v2.1 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
- Google Gemini: no need
- OpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq: no need
- Claude from Anthropic: no need
What takes points off
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What adds points
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
- Every article starts with100
- Gender and rights perspective+4
- Calificación (entre 0 y 100, con redondeo y topes por categoría)100
What it does well
- Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
- Gives context with data
What the post says, fact-checked
Al analizar la publicación, Turing revisa las cifras, leyes y casos que afirma y lo que dicen las organizaciones, personas legisladoras y autoridades que cita, y los compara con el Memorial, el Observatorio Legislativo y verificaciones publicadas.
Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...
Certified copy
Proof that this post existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-BKSH-E7NA
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 6, 2026, 18:15:55 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
- 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read (text, account, date and images) and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
- 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 6, 2026, 18:15:55 (Central Mexico time).
- 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
- 4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress) It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
- 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Internet Archive no acepta guardar publicaciones de instagram.com por ahora. It is their decision, not a failure. We try again every week and, meanwhile, we try public views of the same content. The digital fingerprint and the third-party timestamps (FreeTSA and Bitcoin) are enough to verify the copy.
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Why does this make it authentic?
- It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
- The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
- Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
- It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
- Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
a99a7c610755de9aa86a273c5629636c12836440519e84785e5662d24735e595
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
What is it worth as evidence?
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
Sobre la publicación
Data
- Account
- @transcontinenta · Instagram
- Last analyzed
- November 6, 2026
- Turing
- 2.1 (the current one)
- State
- Online
Saved versions
- 100Version 1 · November 6, 2026 · 21 words
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Are you from the outlet?
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewKeep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.