Analysis of the article
Llama secretario de Cultura a diputados electos por cuota LGBT a decir la verdad sobre su orientación sexual
385 Grados · published on July 3, 2024
The essentials
Very good writing
Backed up and certified CC-BDJZ-B497
La nota usa expresiones agresivas o de odio y no respeta el nombre o el género de la persona.
- Outlet
- 385 Grados
- Published
- July 3, 2024
- Analyzed
- November 7, 2026
- State
- Online
What Turing analyzed
Where we found it
Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. La franja ámbar con señala lo que va contra nuestros derechos. The other underlines are wording details; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we flagged it.
abc Goes against our rights abc Hostile speech abc Name and gender abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote
Llama secretario de Cultura a diputados electos por cuota LGBT a decir la verdad sobre su orientación sexual
*Están usurpando espacios destinados para community development. LGBT.
… Maire PISCIL / El secretario de Cultura, Antonio Martínez Velázquez llamó a las tres diputadas locales que resultaron electas el pasado dos de junio a través de la acción afirmativa of community development. - sexual diversity implementada por el Instituto tlaxcalteca de Elecciones (ITE) a realizar un examen de conciencia y decir la verdad al pueblo sobre su orientación sexual, pues están usurpando espacios que les corresponde a quienes integran la población Lesbianas, Gays, Bisexuales, Travestis, Transgéneros, Transexuales, Intersexuales y Queer (LGBTTTIQ+).
Mientras que a las y los dirigentes de los diversos institutos políticos a que volteen a ver a los cuadros de militantes donde hay perfiles competitivos y que pertenecen a los grupos prioritarios, de lo contrario los avances que se han tenido hasta ahora no servirán de nada si se tiene que mentir para cumplir con las affirmative actions de la autoridad electoral, por una “vulgar ambición de obtener un puesto público”.
De acuerdo al registro realizado por la candidatura común “Sigamos Haciendo Historia en Tlaxcala” que formaron Morena, PVEM, PANALT, Fuerza por México y Redes Sociales Progresistas (RSP) ante el ITE en el pasado proceso ordinario 2023-2024, se inscribieron por el distrito 07 de Tlaxcala, Madaí Pérez Carrillo y en el distrito 05 de Panotla, a Aurora Villeda Temoltzin como parte de community development. LGBT, quienes obtuvieron el mayor número de votos, de modo que serán integrantes de la LXV Legislatura local.
Lo mismo ocurre con Soraya Noemi Bocardo Philips del Partido Verde Ecologista de México (PVEM) quien ocupó el primer lugar de la lista de diputaciones de representación proporcional y fue registrada como2 (ver el señalamiento 2 en el análisis) parte de community development. - sexual diversity y resultó electa por esa vía.
Goes against our rights: Con ello se avizora que no sean retomados los pendientes de la lGBT agenda1 (ver el señalamiento 1 en el análisis) en la entidad, lamentó el funcionario estatal.
“Soy portavoz de ello, y por supuesto que, no hay garantía de que lo hagan (retomen la agenda), por eso es un llamado enérgico a un ejercicio de conciencia personal de que están usurpando un lugar de las poblaciones LGBT en Tlaxcala”.
How it was rated
The full analysis
What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.
Very good
- Aggressive language
- Wrong name or gender
- Inclusive language
La nota usa expresiones agresivas o de odio y no respeta el nombre o el género de la persona.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2024 Date of publication
Analyzed with Turing v2.1 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
- Google Gemini: no need
- OpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq: no need
- Claude from Anthropic: no need
What takes points off
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What adds points
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
How to read this rating
- Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 87 out of 100
- Every article starts with100
- Name and gender−12
- Hostile speech−14
- Gender and rights perspective+10
- Inclusive language+5
- What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−2
- Rating87
Turing la relacionó con lo que ya sabe el sitio
- Madai Pérez Carrillo · Directorio legislativo · Morena
What is worth changing
-
Hostile speech
…no traicionar al pueblo. · Con ello se avizora que no sean retomados los pendientes de la lGBT agenda en la entidad, lamentó el funcionario estatal. · Indicó que este tema fue ampliamente…
See it in the text It presents the rights of LGBTTTIQANB+ people as a conspiracy. -
Name and gender
…ocupó el primer lugar de la lista de diputaciones de representación proporcional y fue registrada como parte de la comunidad de la diversidad sexual y resultó electa por esa vía. · …
See it in the text Why we flag it: CONAPRED’s Glossary (2016) and good-practice guides ask to respect the name the person lived by, even if it wasn’t legally recognized, and not to reveal their trans identity without their consent. Don’t publish their legal name: their name is the one they used.
What it does well
- Names sexual orientation
- Talks about sexual diversity
- Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
- Gives context with data
- Talks about affirmative action
What it claims
What the article says, fact-checked
In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.
-
Antonio Martínez Velázquez Authority
«En Tlaxcala son 69 mil personas mayores de 18 años que pertenecen al sector de la diversidad sexual.»
Does not match our recordsThe figure (69,000) is higher than what we documented (3). It may come from another organization that counts differently: check its source. Our count is a minimum: it only includes cases with a public source we were able to review.
See the evidence
Report VR-2026-2PBTZJ · PDF · Turing compara con lo que tenemos documentado (un conteo mínimo). No decimos «falso»: si no coincide, te enseñamos la evidencia. See a mistake?
Who speaks
Legislative observatory
The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the article.
Legislative observatory
Since this article talks about of legislators, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.
Topic: Affirmative action and political representation
-
See their record
Diputación local de Tlaxcala · Morena
Madai Pérez Carrillo No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
-
See their record
Diputación local de Tlaxcala · Redes Sociales Progresistas
María Aurora Villeda Temoltzin No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
-
See their record
Diputación local de Tlaxcala · Sin partido
Soraya Noemi Bocardo Phillips No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
The proof
Certified copy
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-BDJZ-B497
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 7, 2026, 00:10:06 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
- 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
- 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 7, 2026, 00:10:06 (Central Mexico time).
- 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
- 4. Copy at Internet Archive (done) Saved on November 7, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy on the Internet Archive (opens in another tab)
- 5. Monitoring (done) It was still online on November 7, 2026. We check it from time to time.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Backed up on archive.org
Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 7, 2026, 06:20 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.
Why does this make it authentic?
- It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
- The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
- Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
- It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
- Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
20a59c39a4207f0efd6be1d53e9206edb7159f1af047185e12d480251a5fb8f1
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
What is it worth as evidence?
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
Record
About the note
Data
- Outlet
- 385 Grados
- Byline
- admin
- Published
- July 3, 2024
- Last analyzed
- November 7, 2026
- Turing
- 2.1 (the current one)
- State
- Online
Saved versions
- 87Version 1 · November 7, 2026 · 949 words
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Are you from the outlet?
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewKeep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.