Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Transsexual Woman Murdered in Mexico City Taxi

Desastre MX · published on January 29, 2018

The essentials

Very good writing

La borraron: tenemos su copia certificada CC-VCNH-6NKG

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans», habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones.

Published
January 29, 2018
Analyzed
November 7, 2026
State
No longer online
PDF

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

Article deleted afterwards: verified copy from November 7, 2026. Turing analyzed it and saved its copy with a digital fingerprint and a third-party timestamp. We checked it on November 7, 2026 and it was no longer online. Deleting it does not change its analysis or the evaluation of whoever posted it. See the certificate CC-VCNH-6NKG

This article is no longer online. La publicación fue eliminada después de que Turing la analizó. Abajo está la copia que guardamos. También hay una copy on Internet Archive.

What Turing analyzed

The text, underlined

Esto es lo que Turing leyó y calificó. Los demás subrayados son detalles de redacción; el número lleva a su explicación en el análisis. Toca o pasa el mouse sobre una marca para ver por qué la señalamos.

Desastre MX desastre.mx

abc What it does well «…» Direct quote

Asesinan a mujer transexual en taxi de la Ciudad de México

Noticias LGBTIQ (+) de México y el mundo. Hagamos comunidad.

Este viernes una joven mujer transexual de nombre Paola Carrasco fue asesinada por un grupo de hombres, quienes la agredieron con un arma de fuego luego de abordar un taxi en la delegación Gustavo A. Madero.

De acuerdo con las investigaciones, este fin de semana Paola, quien se dedicaba al trabajo sexual, abordó un taxi que circulaba por Calzada de Guadalupe, a la altura de Juventino Rosas, en la Colonia Peralvillo, en la delegación Gustavo A. Madero.

Poco tiempo de abordar el automóvil, un segundo auto de color blanco interceptó al taxi y abrió fuego en contra de Paola. Según reportaron los peritos, en el automóvil de los agresores viajaban dos sujetos, quienes dispararon en cinco ocasiones en contra de Paola y una en contra del conductor.

Al lugar de los hechos acudieron ambulancias para dar auxilio a la mujer y al conductor; no obstante, Paola perdió la vida debido a los impactos de bala, mientras que el chofer del automóvil fue trasladado al hospital Rubén Leñero, donde se recupera del impacto de bala que recibió.

La Procuraduría General de Justicia de la Ciudad de México informó que debido a que en la investigación no se halló ningún indicio que apuntara a un budget asalto, la línea de investigación se centrará en el “ataque directo” como la causa probable del atentado.

Noticias LGBTI (+) de México y el mundo. Hagamos comunidad. #QuieroDesastre

Marijo, la mujer lesbiana y activist LGBT que busca ser diputada en Puebla

Este fin de semana se llevó a cabo el Segundo Encuentro de Diversidad Sexual Anticapitalista: La Tormenta ya está aquí,...

No longer online

How it was rated

The full analysis

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans», habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2018 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.4 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 6 strengths
Inclusive language Not applicable
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+10
  3. Only gives voice to the authorities−3
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−9
  5. Rating98

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities1 vez
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • ExpertsNo

It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.

What it does well

  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Respects the presumption of innocence
  • Uses “sex work”

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Legislative observatory

The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the article.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-VCNH-6NKG

Deleted after it was certified Sealed on November 7, 2026, 05:05:14 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-VCNH-6NKG Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 7, 2026, 05:05:14 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copia en archive.today En fila para archive.today.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was deleted later. The copy proves it existed.

ARCHIVE.TODAY · archive.ph

En fila para archive.today

Turing la guarda en archive.today, un archivo público e independiente. Va de una en una, para no saturarlo, y lo que tiene dichos va primero; el enlace aparece aquí en cuanto quede guardada. Mientras, la copia ya es válida con su huella digital y sus sellos de tiempo.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 093c83d44b4710819dda808b71c1da4829a3badd74fa154f9c5015e46cffbe47

The link no longer opened: Turing read it from the Internet Archive copy.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

Por eso cada copia usa estándares abiertos que cualquiera puede comprobar sin confiar en nosotros: huella SHA-256, sello de tiempo RFC 3161 de un tercero, OpenTimestamps sobre Bitcoin y la copia independiente de archive.today.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Published
January 29, 2018
Last analyzed
November 7, 2026
Turing
2.4 (the current one)
State
No longer online
Place of the events
Mexico

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.