Skip to content

Analysis of the article

The LGBTTTI community condemns the murder of transsexuals in Cordoba

Formato Siete · published on September 28, 2017

The essentials

Very good writing

La borraron: tenemos su copia certificada CC-YZJ4-M9WY

The note does not respect the person's name or gender.

Published
September 28, 2017
Analyzed
November 7, 2026
State
No longer online
PDF

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

Article deleted afterwards: verified copy from November 7, 2026. Turing analyzed it and saved its copy with a digital fingerprint and a third-party timestamp. We checked it on November 7, 2026 and it was no longer online. Deleting it does not change its analysis or the evaluation of whoever posted it. See the certificate CC-YZJ4-M9WY

This article is no longer online. La publicación fue eliminada después de que Turing la analizó. Abajo está la copia que guardamos. También hay una copy on Internet Archive.

What Turing analyzed

The text, underlined

Esto es lo que Turing leyó y calificó. Los demás subrayados son detalles de redacción; el número lleva a su explicación en el análisis. Toca o pasa el mouse sobre una marca para ver por qué la señalamos.

Formato Siete formato7.com

abc Name and gender abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Condena comunidad LGBTTTI el asesinato de transexual en Córdoba

Córdoba, Ver. – Tras el asesinato de una mujer transexual en el municipio de Córdoba, community development. LGBTTTI condenó los actos y solicitaron a las autoridades investigar a fondo el crimen, el cual catalogaron como un acto de “intolerancia y falta de valores”.

La noche del miércoles, a un costado de la autopista Veracruz-México a la altura del kilómetro 291, Juan Carlos Tlachino, Known as2 Tannyz Gómez, was murdered1 de un disparo en la cabeza.

Este sería el primer hate crime que se registra en el municipio de Córdoba, sin embargo, de acuerdo con datos de community development. Lésbico gay, bisexual, travesti, transexual, transgénero e intersexuales.

En que va del año, en Veracruz suman-con este-14 hate crimes, lo que lo coloca en el segundo lugar con más casos a nivel nacional.

La muerte de Tannyz Gómez, fue condenada por diversos grupos de campaigners a trasvés de las redes sociales, quienes exigieron un esclarecimiento del crimen.

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

No longer online

How it was rated

The full analysis

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Wrong name or gender
  • Inclusive language

The note does not respect the person's name or gender.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2017 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.4 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender Leve · 2 señalamientos · resta 13
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 5 strengths
Inclusive language 100%

How to read this rating

  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 93 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Name and gender−13
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. Inclusive language+5
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−9
  6. Rating93

This article is a source for a case in the record. We check whether it names Juan Carlos Tlachino with their name and gender, as stated in the record. The legal name is never shown.

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations1 vez
  • ExpertsNo

What is worth changing

  1. Name and gender …a la altura del kilómetro 291, Juan Carlos Tlachino, conocido como Tannyz Gómez, was murdered de un disparo en la cabeza. · Este sería el primer crimen de odio que se registra en el… See it in the text Why we flag it: Changing a trans person’s gender within the same article denies their identity. CONAPRED’s Glossary (2016) and guides for journalists ask to always name them with the gender they lived by. The article names her as a trans woman and here it uses the masculine. Write “fue asesinada”, “fue hallada sin vida”. It says was murderedBetter sayfue asesinadafue hallada sin vida
  2. Name and gender …de la autopista Veracruz-México a la altura del kilómetro 291, Juan Carlos Tlachino, Known as Tannyz Gómez, fue asesinado de un disparo en la cabeza. · Este sería el primer crimen… See it in the text If that was their name, it isn’t a nickname: use it as their name.

What it does well

  • Names the hate crime
  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Names discrimination
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Legislative observatory

The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the article.

In the Memorial

This article is connected to stories we have already documented.

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-YZJ4-M9WY

Deleted after it was certified Sealed on November 7, 2026, 05:15:08 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-YZJ4-M9WY Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 7, 2026, 05:15:08 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copia en archive.today En fila para archive.today.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was deleted later. The copy proves it existed.

ARCHIVE.TODAY · archive.ph

En fila para archive.today

Turing la guarda en archive.today, un archivo público e independiente. Va de una en una, para no saturarlo, y lo que tiene dichos va primero; el enlace aparece aquí en cuanto quede guardada. Mientras, la copia ya es válida con su huella digital y sus sellos de tiempo.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 3b11f10c345f14fb66ee433a6955ff6c68537344b25cbccf159814106bc48fa7

The link no longer opened: Turing read it from the Internet Archive copy.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

Por eso cada copia usa estándares abiertos que cualquiera puede comprobar sin confiar en nosotros: huella SHA-256, sello de tiempo RFC 3161 de un tercero, OpenTimestamps sobre Bitcoin y la copia independiente de archive.today.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Published
September 28, 2017
Last analyzed
November 7, 2026
Turing
2.4 (the current one)
State
No longer online
Place of the events
Mexico

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.