Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Asesinan a reina de belleza gay en Chiapas

24 Horas · published on April 20, 2026

The essentials

Very good writing

Backed up and certified CC-3RBB-NQEE

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, nombra el transfeminicidio, habla de diversidad sexual.

Outlet
24 Horas
Published
April 20, 2026
Analyzed
November 8, 2026
State
Online
Leer en 24-horas.mx PDF

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

What Turing analyzed

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. Los demás subrayados son detalles de redacción; el número lleva a su explicación en el análisis. Toca o pasa el mouse sobre una marca para ver por qué la señalamos.

24 Horas 24-hours.mx

Asesinan a reina de belleza gay en Chiapas

Por Argenis Esquipulas ·

abc Sensationalism abc What it does well

La noche del sábado, en la colonia Linda Vista Poniente de Cintalapa, los disparos no sólo mataron a un joven de 27 años: ejecutaron a un símbolo de la sexual diversity en el sureste mexicano.

Paramédicos sólo confirmaron la muerte. Su organización, Num México Gay, exige justicia y que se investigue como hate crime. La Fiscalía, hasta ahora, ha guardado silencio.

La transfobia también está en el vecino, en el policía, en el servidor público que niega la identidad.

Las cifras son escalofriantes1. Mientras el cuerpo de Noé Alejandro era velado, las organizaciones reportaron que la violencia transfeminicida en Chiapas aumentó 200 por ciento durante 2025. México es ya el segundo país de América con más transfeminicidios.

How it was rated

The full analysis

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, nombra el transfeminicidio, habla de diversidad sexual.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.5 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 6
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 7 strengths
Inclusive language Not applicable

How to read this rating

  • It has a yellowish detail, shown below. They take points off, but they are not enough to call it a “sensationalist article”: that happens when sensationalism sets the tone of the whole article. In the statistics it counts among articles “with some sensationalist detail”.
  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 97 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Sensationalism−6
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−7
  5. Rating97

What is worth changing

  1. Sensationalism …vecino, en el policía, en el servidor público que niega la identidad. · Las cifras son escalofriantes. Mientras el cuerpo de Noé Alejandro era velado, las organizaciones reportaron que la… See it in the text Sensationalist adjective. Describe the facts soberly.

What it does well

  • Names the hate crime
  • Names transfemicide
  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names discrimination
  • Includes the demand for justice
  • Gives context with data
  • Calls for investigating it as a hate crime

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Legislative observatory

The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the article.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

Topic: Crímenes de odio y transfeminicidios · No discriminación por orientación o identidad

In the Memorial

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-3RBB-NQEE

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 8, 2026, 08:05:46 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-3RBB-NQEE Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 8, 2026, 08:05:46 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy c5f6fdd4e904a11b40796ed1ef175274f3781136557d94a30fe3102bc41e976f

The link no longer opened: Turing read it from the Internet Archive copy.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Outlet
24 Horas
Byline
Argenis Esquipulas
Published
April 20, 2026
Last analyzed
November 8, 2026
Turing
2.5 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.