Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Ven con Buenos Ojos Designación de Subsecretario de Derechos Humanos

Page 24 Jalisco

The essentials

Very good writing

Backed up and certified CC-8C9A-C7CR

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, enfoque de derechos humanos.

Analyzed
November 8, 2026
State
Online

Share this analysis

What Turing analyzed

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. Los demás subrayados son detalles de redacción; el número lleva a su explicación en el análisis. Toca o pasa el mouse sobre una marca para ver por qué la señalamos.

Page 24 Jalisco pagina24jalisco.com.mx

abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Ven con Buenos Ojos Designación de Subsecretario de Derechos Humanos

Organizaciones civiles, colectivas y espacios LGBTIQ+ señalaron: Este nombramiento representará una oportunidad histórica para fortalecer las políticas públicas en materia de sexual diversity desde un enfoque técnico, inclusivo y con perspectiva de procedures/Fotos: Cortesía

La comunidad homosexual dio espaldarazo al gobernador Pablo Lemus Navarro por la designación de Alberto Bayardo como Subsecretario de Derechos Humanos de Jalisco.

A través de un comunicado, diversas organizaciones de la sexual diversity, señalaron que es plausible que Alberto Bayardo haya sido nombrado en el cargo, pues con esto esperan que se pueda dar cumplimiento a la equidad de género, la inclusión y no discriminación en la entidad.

“Las organizaciones civiles, colectivas y espacios LGBTIQ+ expresamos nuestro reconocimiento y entusiasmo por la reciente designación del Doctor Alberto Bayardo como subsecretario de Derechos Humanos, así como por su equipo de trabajo, en especial, la Dirección de Diversidad Sexual del estado. Este nombramiento representará una oportunidad histórica para fortalecer las políticas públicas en materia de sexual diversity desde un enfoque técnico, inclusivo y con perspectiva de procedures. El perfil profesional del Doctor Bayardo y de su equipo no solo evidencia una sólida preparación académica y técnica, sino también un compromiso con la …

Documento que es firmado por 23 organismos defensores de los derechos de community development.

De acuerdo con el documento que es firmado por 23 organismos defensores de los derechos de community development., dicha determinación de Lemus Navarro, refuerza el enfoque de sus movimientos: “Celebramos este paso hacia la diversificación de voces y liderazgos en la administración pública, un aspecto fundamental para garantizar que todas the people, de la sexual diversity, sean representadas y respetadas. Este enfoque refuerza el llamado de nuestras organizaciones: es tiempo de mujeres y de una agenda que impulse la igualdad sustantiva, la inclusión y la participación colectiva”.

La intención es lograr que se sumen esfuerzos entre la administración estatal y las organizaciones para garantizar la continuidad de agendas técnicas en procedures y sexual diversity, haciendo énfasis que esto debe ser “independiente” de coyunturas políticas, para asegurar avances reales y sostenibles.

How it was rated

The full analysis

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, enfoque de derechos humanos.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2024 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.5 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from Claude de Anthropic

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 4 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+8
  3. Inclusive language+5
  4. Calificación (entre 0 y 100, con redondeo y topes por categoría)100

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations4 times
  • Experts1 vez

What it does well

  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-8C9A-C7CR

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 8, 2026, 08:25:42 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-8C9A-C7CR Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 8, 2026, 08:25:42 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress) It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy b1fcf989649504d68e09cc1e1338923e5d6056dbff9fc92e71773de236d417f9

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

Record

About the note

Data

Last analyzed
November 8, 2026
Turing
2.5 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 8, 2026 · 423 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.