Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Diputadas trans de Morena condenan dichos de senador Armenta contra infancias trans; él se disculpa

El Universal · published on May 31, 2023

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, nombra la expresión de género, usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans».

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Para responder hay que iniciar sesión: así tus correcciones quedan en tu seguimiento.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
May 31, 2023
Analyzed
November 8, 2026
State
Online
Read at eluniversal.com.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. La franja ámbar con señala lo que va contra nuestros derechos. The other underlines are wording details; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we flagged it.

El Universal eluniversal.com.mx

Diputadas trans de Morena condenan dichos de senador Armenta contra infancias trans; él se disculpa

Por Eduardo Dina ·

abc Goes against our rights abc Generic masculine abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

El presidente del Senado mencionó que en el reconocimiento de las infancias trans estaba definido: “Los niños, las niñas, tienen el derecho a elegir y decidir sobre su vida cuando son mayores de edad”.

“Respeto a la niñez, cuando tienen 18 años y deciden hacer de su vida la que corresponda, eso significa ejercicio pleno de derechos, yo creo que eso implica una responsabilidad. Tenemos que ver el bosque, no irnos por las modas o por las circunstancias, hay que respetar la niñez.

Goes against our rights: “Usted no respeta, usted discrimina, su ignorancia es discurso de hatred, su ignorancia mata”, escribió la legisladora en redes sociales.

“Nadie puede pasar por encima de los derechos reconocidos por la Corte y Tratados internacionales (Corte Interamericana of Derechos Humanos) de las infancias Trans”, agregó.

Goes against our rights: No sr @armentapuebla_ NO SOMOS MODA usted no respeta usted Discrimina su ignorancia es discurso de hatred su ignorancia mata Nadie pude pasar por encima de los derechos reconocidos por la corte @SCJN y Tratados internacionales @CorteIDH de las infancias Trans 🏳️‍⚧️ #infaciastransYA pic.twitter.com/ZAnUuluwLL— Salma Luévano Luna (@SalmaLuevano) May 30, 2023

Goes against our rights: “Quiero hacer un llamado muy enérgico al senador para decirle que las Trans people no somos una moda, y que las infancias trans tampoco son una moda. Cada persona trans que él dice ser su amiga fue un infante trans”, dijo la legisladora en conferencia de prensa al condenar los ataques transfóbicos y exigir una disculpa.

“Reconocemos a the people of community development. diversa que se vieron afectados por mis declaraciones. A ellas, a ellos les ofrezco una disculpa.

Pertenezco a @PartidoMorenaMx, un partido defensor de los derechos de todas y todos.La Constitución Mexicana deja claro que los procedures son para todas the people, sin reservas. Como sociedad debemos estar más conscientes de lo que significa la diversidad y lo que… pic.twitter.com/zSFWAjQoQD— Alejandro Armenta (@armentapuebla_) May 31, 2023

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, nombra la expresión de género, usa «mujer trans», «hombre trans» o «persona trans».

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2023 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.7 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from Claude de Anthropic

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 8 strengths
Inclusive language 79%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+10
  3. Inclusive language+3
  4. Calificación (entre 0 y 100, con redondeo y topes por categoría)100

Turing related it to what the site already knows

  • El Universal · Observatorio de Medios · 59 notas · promedio 95 de 100

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighbors1 vez
  • Collectives and organizations1 vez
  • Experts1 vez

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names gender expression
  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Names discrimination
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Cites Inter-American case law
  • Remembers the person with a dignified photo

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

  1. The article

    «Alejandro Armenta realizó expresiones contra las infancias y adolescencias trans al mencionar que los niños y niñas tienen derecho a elegir y decidir sobre su vida cuando son mayores de edad.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence
  2. Salma Luévano Legislator For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Salma Luévano señaló a Alejandro Armenta de discriminación por sus dichos contra las infancias trans.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence
  3. María Clemente García Legislator For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «María Clemente García solicitó a la Comisión de Honestidad y Justicia de Morena que haga un extrañamiento al senador Alejandro Armenta.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence
  4. Alejandro Armenta Legislator

    «Alejandro Armenta ofreció una disculpa a las personas de la comunidad diversa que se vieron afectadas por sus declaraciones.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-XF69YN · PDF · Turing compara con lo que tenemos documentado (un conteo mínimo). No decimos «falso»: si no coincide, te enseñamos la evidencia. See a mistake?

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

Topic: Identidad de género de las infancias y adolescencias trans · Reconocimiento de la identidad de género

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-T6GC-68GE

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 8, 2026, 13:17:33 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-T6GC-68GE Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 8, 2026, 13:17:33 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (done) Saved on November 8, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy on the Internet Archive (opens in another tab)
  5. 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 8, 2026, 19:17 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy faa052efb66e5d9395b1b2438c1a343b0c926aab12daf76d488874202b383653

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Eduardo Dina
Published
May 31, 2023
Last analyzed
November 8, 2026
Turing
2.7 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 8, 2026 · 765 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.