Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Armenta Mier no reconoce las infancias trans; que decidan cuando tengan 18 años, dice

MTP Noticias · published on May 29, 2023

How is it written?

Very good writing

The article uses respectful language.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

Para responder hay que iniciar sesión: así tus correcciones quedan en tu seguimiento.

Correct Turing's analysis
Published
May 29, 2023
Analyzed
November 8, 2026
State
Online
Leer en mtpnoticias.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. Los demás subrayados son detalles de redacción; el número lleva a su explicación en el análisis. Toca o pasa el mouse sobre una marca para ver por qué la señalamos.

MTP Noticias mtpnoticias.com

Por Manu Cuellar ·

abc Generic masculine abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Armenta Mier no reconoce las infancias trans; que decidan cuando tengan 18 años, dice

Inicio / Puebla / Armenta Mier no reconoce las infancias trans; que decidan cuando tengan 18 años, dice

Armenta Mier no reconoce las infancias trans; que decidan cuando tengan 18 años, dice

Alejandro Armenta no reconoce las infancias trans a pesar de que la SCJN ya lo hace.

A pesar de que la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (SCJN) ya reconoció a las infancias trans, el presidente del Senado de la República, Alejandro Armenta Mier se manifestó en contra al considerar que deben tener 18 años para decidir además de considerar que es “una moda”.

“Los niños, las niñas tienen el derecho a elegir y decidir sobre su vida cuando son mayores de edad. Antes, cualquier acción, soy muy claro: yo respeto la diversidad, toda. Y respetó community development. LGBT, toda, y tengo muchos amigos, muchos conocidos, y los respeto y los defiendo, pero un niño, hasta los 18 años debe de decidir”, dijo.

“Eso se llama ejercicio pleno de derechos. Yo creo que eso implica una responsabilidad. Tenemos que ver el bosque, no sólo irnos por las modas o por las circunstancias. Hay que respetar la niñez”, dijo.

La SCJN ha considerado inconstitucional la exigencia de tener 18 años cumplidos para solicitar una nueva acta de nacimiento que reconozca su gender identity y ha solicitado a los Congresos como al de Puebla, a reconocer las infancias trans.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2023 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.7 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from Claude de Anthropic

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 2 strengths
Inclusive language 92%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+4
  3. Inclusive language+4
  4. Calificación (entre 0 y 100, con redondeo y topes por categoría)100

Turing related it to what the site already knows

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations1 vez
  • ExpertsNo

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

  1. The article

    «La Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (SCJN) ha considerado inconstitucional la exigencia de tener 18 años cumplidos para solicitar una nueva acta de nacimiento que reconozca la identidad de género.»

    Matches our records

    Según nuestra tabla de leyes vigentes, en todo el país es obligatorio por una sentencia o jurisprudencia de la Suprema Corte (Jurisprudencia 2a./J. 173/2019 (registro 2021582)). En el Observatorio Legislativo tenemos 8 iniciativas sobre identidad de género en el Congreso de la Unión: 0 aprobadas, 8 en trámite y 0 rech…

    See the evidence

  2. Alejandro Armenta Mier Legislator Against LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Alejandro Armenta Mier se manifestó en contra de las infancias trans al considerar que deben tener 18 años para decidir sobre su vida.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-NFB9DA · PDF · Turing compara con lo que tenemos documentado (un conteo mínimo). No decimos «falso»: si no coincide, te enseñamos la evidencia. See a mistake?

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

Since this article talks about of a legislator, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Identidad de género de las infancias y adolescencias trans · Reconocimiento de la identidad de género

  • Senaduría de la República · Morena

    Ignacio Mier Velazco No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-NY6U-VKAY

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 8, 2026, 13:19:02 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-NY6U-VKAY Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 8, 2026, 13:19:02 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 839c9d1054143d1f9d1de6dededa9f6d1c14d23a255a3a7245600637b18d2b7e

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Manu Cuellar
Published
May 29, 2023
Last analyzed
November 8, 2026
Turing
2.7 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 8, 2026 · 789 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.