Skip to content

Analysis of the article

'Es una moda', dice Alejandro Armenta sobre las infancias trans

Aristegui Noticias · published on May 30, 2023

How is it written?

Very good writing

The article uses respectful language.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

Para responder hay que iniciar sesión: así tus correcciones quedan en tu seguimiento.

Correct Turing's analysis
Published
May 30, 2023
Analyzed
November 8, 2026
State
Online
Leer en aristeguinoticias.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. La franja ámbar con señala lo que va contra nuestros derechos. The other underlines are wording details; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we flagged it.

Aristegui Noticias aristeguinoticias.com

Por Redacción AN / ACJ ·

abc Goes against our rights abc Generic masculine abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

'Es una moda', dice Alejandro Armenta sobre las infancias trans

Alejandro Armenta, presidente de la Mesa Directiva del Senado de la República, se pronunció en contra de las infancias trans alegando que se tiene que “respetar la niñez”.

“Los niños, las niñas, tienen el derecho a elegir y decidir sobre sus vidas cuando son mayores de edad, antes no”, expresó el Senador morenista por Puebla en una rueda de prensa.

Además expresó que “se trata de una moda” y no de una cuestión de procedures.

“Yo respeto la diversidad plena, respecto a community development. LGBT y tengo muchos amigos, muchos conocidos y los respeto y los apoyo; pero, un niño hasta los 18 años debe de decidir y si no puede decidir no puede ser motivado a ninguna acción que afecte su estado emocional”, fue la forma en la que el Senador justificó su postura.

El 3 de marzo de 2022, la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (SCJN) reconoció a las infancias trans y eliminó el criterio de tener 18 años cumplidos para poder solicitar una nueva acta de nacimiento.

🚨#ÚLTIMAHORA | Alejandro Armenta, presidente de la Mesa Directiva del Senado, se pronunció en contra de las infancias y adolescencias trans

Actualmente en 18 estados de México se reconoce el derecho de the people para poder cambiar el nombre e gender identity en el acta de nacimiento.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2023 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.7 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 3 strengths
Inclusive language 90%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+6
  3. Inclusive language+4
  4. Calificación (entre 0 y 100, con redondeo y topes por categoría)100

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

  1. The article

    «El 3 de marzo de 2022, la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación reconoció a las infancias trans y eliminó el criterio de tener 18 años cumplidos para poder solicitar una nueva acta de nacimiento.»

    Matches our records

    Según nuestra tabla de leyes vigentes, en todo el país es obligatorio por una sentencia o jurisprudencia de la Suprema Corte (Jurisprudencia 2a./J. 173/2019 (registro 2021582)). En el Observatorio Legislativo tenemos 8 iniciativas sobre identidad de género en el Congreso de la Unión: 0 aprobadas, 8 en trámite y 0 rech…

    See the evidence

  2. The article

    «Actualmente en 18 estados de México se reconoce el derecho de las personas para poder cambiar el nombre e identidad de género en el acta de nacimiento.»

    Does not match our records

    The figure (18) is lower than what we documented (814). Our count is a minimum: it only includes cases with a public source we were able to review.

    See the evidence

  3. The article

    «En la Ciudad de México, Oaxaca y Jalisco se reconocen las infancias trans.»

    Unconfirmed

    Only this article says it, and we didn’t find it in our records or in any other source. Until an official source or two independent media outlets confirm it, it remains unconfirmed.

    See the evidence

  4. Asociación por las Infancias Transgénero Organization For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «En México se han emitido 70 actas de nacimiento para menores de edad transgénero.»

    Does not match our records

    The figure (70) is lower than what we documented (814). Our count is a minimum: it only includes cases with a public source we were able to review.

    See the evidence

  5. Alejandro Armenta Legislator Against LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Los niños y las niñas tienen el derecho a elegir y decidir sobre sus vidas cuando son mayores de edad, antes no.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-F7JAS3 · PDF · Turing compara con lo que tenemos documentado (un conteo mínimo). No decimos «falso»: si no coincide, te enseñamos la evidencia. See a mistake?

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

Topic: Identidad de género de las infancias y adolescencias trans · Reconocimiento de la identidad de género

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-YE6J-7YNB

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 8, 2026, 13:19:31 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-YE6J-7YNB Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 8, 2026, 13:19:31 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 8, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 8, 2026, 19:19 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 8032bb0c90f4178593eff3394cfcdffd8fd8ef1cf20292bc723cb1a46a22d7f0

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Redacción AN / ACJ
Published
May 30, 2023
Last analyzed
November 8, 2026
Turing
2.7 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 8, 2026 · 308 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.