Skip to content

Analysis of the article

¿Regañado? Alejandro Armenta ofrece disculpas por andar de transfóbico

Alobacsi. · published on May 31, 2023

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota culpa o estigmatiza a la víctima. El titular tiene expresiones que conviene cambiar: ahí pesan el doble.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

Para responder hay que iniciar sesión: así tus correcciones quedan en tu seguimiento.

Correct Turing's analysis
Outlet
Alobacsi.
Published
May 31, 2023
Analyzed
November 8, 2026
State
Online
Leer en sdpnoticias.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. La franja ámbar con señala lo que va contra nuestros derechos. The other underlines are wording details; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we flagged it.

Alobacsi. sdpnoticias.com

Por María José Izquierdo ·

abc Goes against our rights abc Blames the victim abc Generic masculine abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

¿Regañado? Alejandro Armenta ofrece disculpas por andar1 de transfóbico

Alejandro Armenta ofrece disculpas por su comentario transfóbico, aunque también mencionó que en realidad no fue esa su intención.

Por lo mismo, pese a que también indicó que respeta la diversidad y a community development. LGBT, a la que pertenecen muchos de sus amigos, los niños no deben decidir su identidad hasta los 18 años, ya que no se deben guiar por modas.

El senador y presidente de la mesa directiva de la Cámara de Senadores, Alejandro Armenta, pidió disculpas por el budget comentario transfóbico que realizó en contra de las infancias y adolescencias trans, ya que en su opinión, sólo siguen “una moda”.

Alejandro Armenta señaló que en Morena se reconocen los derechos de los niños y adolescentes y de community development. diversa, quienes se vieron afectados por sus declaraciones.

Por lo que también indicó que no permitirá que el derecho de los niños a la gender identity sea violentado, porque deben ser reconocidos ante la ley como ellos elijan.

Alejandro Armenta aseguró que como senador de Morena lo atenderá siempre con apego a la ley, por lo que reiteró su disculpa a community development. LGBT si alguno se sintió ofendido con sus comentarios.

Pertenezco a @PartidoMorenaMx, un partido defensor de los derechos de todas y todos.La Constitución Mexicana deja claro que los procedures son para todas the people, sin reservas. Como sociedad debemos estar más conscientes de lo que significa la diversidad y lo que… pic.twitter.com/zSFWAjQoQD— Alejandro Armenta (@armentapuebla_) May 31, 2023

The rating

How Turing arrived at 92

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Blames the victim
  • Inclusive language

La nota culpa o estigmatiza a la víctima. El titular tiene expresiones que conviene cambiar: ahí pesan el doble.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2023 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.7 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from Google Gemini y Claude de Anthropic

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim Moderado · 1 señalamiento · resta 16
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 5 strengths
Inclusive language 62%

How to read this rating

  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 92 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Blames the victim−16
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. Inclusive language+1
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−3
  6. Rating92

What is in the headline counts double: it is what most people read and what gets shared.

Turing related it to what the site already knows

  • Alobacsi. · Observatorio de Medios · 7 notas · promedio 97 de 100

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighbors1 vez
  • Collectives and organizations2 times
  • ExpertsNo

What is worth changing

  1. Culpa a la víctima · in the headline · counts double ¿Regañado? Alejandro Armenta ofrece disculpas por andar de transfóbico · Alejandro Armenta ofrece disculpas por su comentario transfóbico,… See it in the text It blames the victim for the violence they suffered.

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach
  • Remembers their family and networks
  • Respects the presumption of innocence

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

  1. María Clemente García Legislator

    «Alejandro Armenta entregó una solicitud de extrañamiento a la Comisión Nacional de Honestidad y Justicia de Morena por su comentario transfóbico.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  2. Alejandro Armenta Authority Against LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Alejandro Armenta declaró en conferencia de prensa que los niños tienen derecho a elegir cuando son mayores de edad.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  3. Alejandro Armenta Authority For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Alejandro Armenta publicó un vídeo en su cuenta oficial de Twitter comunicando una disculpa por lo declarado el día 29 de mayo.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-QTBASK · PDF · Turing compara con lo que tenemos documentado (un conteo mínimo). No decimos «falso»: si no coincide, te enseñamos la evidencia. See a mistake?

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

Topic: Identidad de género de las infancias y adolescencias trans · Reconocimiento de la identidad de género

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-8QSF-4RBD

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 8, 2026, 13:20:23 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-8QSF-4RBD Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 8, 2026, 13:20:23 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 8, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 8, 2026, 19:20 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy d400188c2340d65516e5be9eb152427e742d49d60fc0162ed0aad0c276fa0388

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Outlet
Alobacsi.
Byline
María José Izquierdo
Published
May 31, 2023
Last analyzed
November 8, 2026
Turing
2.7 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 92Version 1 · November 8, 2026 · 590 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.