Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Buscan prohibir las terapias para cambiar la orientación sexual: denuncian graves secuelas y prácticas inapropiadas

La Plata 1 · published on November 7, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la orientación sexual, nombra la expresión de género, habla de diversidad sexual.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

Para responder hay que iniciar sesión: así tus correcciones quedan en tu seguimiento.

Correct Turing's analysis
Published
November 7, 2026
Analyzed
November 8, 2026
State
Online
Leer en laplata1.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. Los demás subrayados son detalles de redacción; el número lleva a su explicación en el análisis. Toca o pasa el mouse sobre una marca para ver por qué la señalamos.

La Plata 1 laplata1.com

Por LA PLATA 1 ·

abc Derogatory term abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Buscan prohibir las terapias para cambiar la sexual orientation: denuncian graves secuelas y prácticas inapropiadas

En la antesala de la Marcha del Orgullo, volvió a instalarse en Buenos Aires una fuerte polémica por las denominadas terapias de conversión, prácticas que buscan modificar la sexual orientation, la identidad o la expresión de género of the people LGBT. Una investigación periodística reveló cómo funcionan algunos de estos procedimientos y sus consecuencias, mientras avanza una iniciativa para prohibirlos expresamente en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires.

El analista Emmanuel Ferrario y el periodista y escritor Cristian Alarcón denunciaron que estas intervenciones continúan ofreciéndose en determinados ámbitos médicos, psicológicos y religiosos. Ambos cuestionaron que se considere la sexual diversity como una condición que necesita tratamiento. “No existe nada que curar”, sostuvo Ferrario durante una entrevista en Infobae.

Uno de los datos más preocupantes surge de una encuesta realizada en Argentina durante 2024 entre 839 personas. Según los resultados difundidos por Alarcón, el 26% afirmó haber atravesado algún intento de modificar su sexual orientation, identidad o expresión de género. Entre quienes vivieron esas experiencias, el 44% manifestó haber tenido pensamientos suicidas y el 75% aseguró haber sufrido depresión después de los intentos de conversión.

La investigación de la revista Anfibia, publicada bajo el título Putos1 antidiseño, permitió documentar el funcionamiento de programas impulsados por determinadas iglesias evangélicas. Para conocer su metodología, un periodista se infiltró en un retiro espiritual realizado en Benavídez, donde participaron 144 personas y se cobraban 200.000 pesos por una estadía de tres días.

Durante esa experiencia, el investigador identificó espacios destinados a personas que buscaban cambiar su sexual orientation. Según Alarcón, algunos de estos grupos utilizan la expresión “antidiseño de Dios” para referirse a quienes no responden al modelo de pareja heterosexual y familia tradicional. Además, describió mecanismos de contención emocional mediante canciones, ceremonias y discursos de pertenencia que pueden influir especialmente sobre personas que atraviesan situaciones de vulnerabilidad.

La investigación también reunió testimonios de sobrevivientes que denunciaron graves consecuencias psicológicas. Entre los casos mencionados aparece el de una persona que atravesó durante cinco años un tratamiento en una fundación de Recoleta y posteriormente intentó suicidarse. El debate vuelve así a poner bajo la lupa prácticas que, según sus denunciantes, continúan desarrollándose en espacios privados y religiosos pese a los cuestionamientos de organismos internacionales de procedures.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 91

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la orientación sexual, nombra la expresión de género, habla de diversidad sexual.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from Claude de Anthropic

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 15
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 5 strengths
Inclusive language 100%

How to read this rating

  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 91 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Derogatory terms−15
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. Talks about suicide and does not say where to seek help−3
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−1
  6. Rating91

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • Experts2 times

What is worth changing

  1. Derogatory terms …de conversión. · La investigación de la revista Anfibia, publicada bajo el título Putos antidiseño, permitió documentar el funcionamiento de programas impulsados por… See it in the text It’s a homophobic slur. If it’s a quote, make clear that it’s an expression of hate.

What it does well

  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names gender expression
  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

Topic: Ban on conversion therapies (SOGICE)

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-JQD4-ZMZ3

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 8, 2026, 14:42:40 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-JQD4-ZMZ3 Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 8, 2026, 14:42:40 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 8, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 8, 2026, 20:42 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy db87be1d8a982d6d327e484c4325ee4d31a7f1369f94f4b4c8fc999e968d635f

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
LA PLATA 1
Published
November 7, 2026
Last analyzed
November 8, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 91Version 1 · November 8, 2026 · 450 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.