Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Cinco estados concentran la mitad de los crímenes de odio en México; Puebla lidera registro

El Popular · published on May 17, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
May 17, 2026
Analyzed
November 9, 2026
State
Online
Leer en elpopular.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

El Popular elpopular.mx

By El Popular ·

abc Name and gender abc What it does well abc Inclusive language

Cinco estados concentran la mitad de los hate crimes en México; Puebla lidera record

La geografía de la violencia letal contra the population. LGBT en México muestra una alta concentración en cinco entidades federativas. De acuerdo con los datos consolidados del Observatory Nacional de Crímenes de Odio contra Personas LGBT, durante el año 2025 se registraron al menos 60 homicidios por motivos de sexual orientation o gender identity en el país; de este total, el 50% de los casos ocurrió en Puebla, Veracruz, Guanajuato, Baja California y Jalisco.

The informe técnico aclara que la presencia de registros en un total de 17 estados responde a la visibilización y cobertura de los medios locales, por lo que no se descarta la existencia de cifras ocultas en el resto del territorio nacional.

Del total nacional, 35 víctimas fueron trans women (58.3%), lo que establece una tasa de 23.7 homicidios por cada cien mil trans women con base en las encuestas del INEGI, un indicador diez veces mayor al de las mujeres cisgénero (2.3). Por su parte, los hombres gay sumaron 19 casos (31.6%), con una tasa de 1.5 homicidios por cada cien mil habitantes.

El análisis pericial revela patrones geográficos y de ejecución específicos: 6 cuerpos de trans women se localizaron en la vía pública y 6 en estéticas o bares, mientras que 9 hombres gay fueron hallados en sus domicilios.

Asimismo, en 21 de los crímenes participaron grupos de 3 o 4 agresores, registrándose ensañamiento físico, ataduras y, en el caso de Puebla, el homicidio de a door1 (see entry 1 in the analysis) gay con evidencias de abuso sexual. Por estos hechos, el sistema penal mantiene bajo proceso a 19 presuntos responsables vinculados con 15 de los casos, de los cuales 11 ya se encuentran detenidos.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 98

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual.

Context pieceGives data, background or analysis. Strong expressions that it only describes or attributes to the press do not count.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender Mild · 1 pointing · subtraction 3
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 8 strengths
Inclusive language 100%

How to read this rating

  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Name and gender−3
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−9
  5. Rating98

Turing related it to what the site already knows

  • El Popular · Observatorio de Medios · 8 notas · promedio 96 de 100

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations1 time
  • ExpertsNo

What is worth changing

  1. Name and gender · review …registrándose ensañamiento físico, ataduras y, en el caso de Puebla, el homicidio de a door gay con evidencias de abuso sexual. Por estos hechos, el sistema penal mantiene bajo… See it in the text Check whether it refers to the victim in the masculine. If she was a trans woman or travesti, use the feminine.

What it does well

  • Names the hate crime
  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Names discrimination
  • Respects the presumption of innocence
  • Gives context with data

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-GE5C-6QKW

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 9, 2026, 07:50:07 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-GE5C-6QKW Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 9, 2026, 07:50:07 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (done) Saved on November 9, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy on the Internet Archive (opens in another tab)
  5. 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 9, 2026, 13:50 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 62da1d1a071b13f5617e3cfd00fda19bbf4f84ab61b20e3bf84f722b43efc828

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
El Popular
Published
May 17, 2026
Last analyzed
November 9, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Saved versions

  • 98Version 1 · November 9, 2026 · 325 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.