Skip to content
Turing

Analysis of the article

Agresión homófoba en Barcelona: deja como saldo seis lesionados; uno casi pierde todos los dientes

Periódico Zócalo · published on May 30, 2021

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, menciona protocolos de actuación, da voz a colectivos y activistas. Una expresión aparece citada o denunciada y no cuenta.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
May 30, 2021
Analyzed
November 9, 2026
State
Online
Leer en zocalo.com.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

Periódico Zócalo zocalo.com.mx

Agresión homófoba en Barcelona: deja como saldo seis lesionados; uno casi pierde todos los dientes

By Grupo Zócalo ·

abc Quoted or analyzed (does not count) abc What it does well «…» Direct quote

Esta agresión se suma a la que padeció la mañana del sábado un joven en el barrio barcelonés de Gràcia y a otra ocurrida también anoche, en el entorno del Auditori de la ciudad, por lo que son tres las agresiones al collective gay registradas este fin de semana en la capital catalana y 76 las habidas en Cataluña en 2021, según los datos del citado observatorio.

Así mismo, trascendió además, que poco antes de esa agresión, sobre las 21:00 horas, otro joven que estaba hablando con una amiga en las proximidades del Auditori de Barcelona fue increpado por otro hombre, también joven, quien le llamó “faggot (slang) de mierda”, antes de agredirle físicamente.

Rodríguez ha condenado “con contundencia” estas bárbaras agresiones y ha lamentado el elevado número de incidentes contra el collective LGBT que se registra en las últimas semanas.

El presidente del Observatori se ha lamentado también “de la impunidad de los agresores”, que no han podido ser detenidos, y del “creciente miedo” que siente el collective.

Rodríguez ha indicado que esta mañana ha hablado con el concejal de Barcelona Marc Serra para poner en marcha un protocol y que espera hacerlo en las próximas horas con el Govern catalán para articular medidas que “frenen esta espiral”.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, menciona protocolos de actuación, da voz a colectivos y activistas. Una expresión aparece citada o denunciada y no cuenta.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2021 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 4 strengths
Inclusive language Not applicable
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+8
  3. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

Turing related it to what the site already knows

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations1 time
  • ExpertsNo

What the article quotes, denounces or attributes to other people

These expressions appear in textual quotations, as terms that the text examines or in words of other people that the note reports or points out as an offense. Naming them to report or denounce them is not using them, so they do not count in the rating.

  • Términos despectivos · en una cita que se denuncia …Auditori de Barcelona fue increpado por otro hombre, también joven, quien le llamó “faggot (slang) de mierda”, antes de agredirle físicamente. · Rodríguez ha condenado “con…

What it does well

  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Mentions action protocols
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Gives context with data

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

  1. The article

    «Esta agresión se suma a la que padeció la mañana del sábado un joven en el barrio barcelonés de Gràcia y a otra ocurrida también anoche, en el entorno del Auditori de la ciudad, por lo que son tres las agresiones al colectivo gay registradas este fin de semana en la capital catalana y 76 las habidas en Cataluña en 2021, según los datos del citado observatorio.»

    Does not match our records

    The figure (76) is higher than what we documented (3). It may come from another organization that counts differently: check its source. Our count is a minimum: it only includes cases with a public source we were able to review.

    See the evidence

  2. The article

    «Fuentes de los Mossos de Cuadra —la policía catalana— han informado de que la agresión múltiple se produjo sobre las 22:00 horas, en la céntrica playa del Somorrostro de Barcelona, suceso por el que han abierto una investigación, si bien aún no se han practicado detenciones.»

    Does not match our records

    The figure (22) is lower than what we documented (45). Our count is a minimum: it only includes cases with a public source we were able to review.

    See the evidence

  3. The article

    «Así mismo, trascendió además, que poco antes de esa agresión, sobre las 21:00 horas, otro joven que estaba hablando con una amiga en las proximidades del Auditori de Barcelona fue increpado por otro hombre, también joven, quien le llamó “maricón de mierda”, antes de agredirle físicamente.»

    Does not match our records

    The figure (21) is lower than what we documented (45). Our count is a minimum: it only includes cases with a public source we were able to review.

    See the evidence

  4. The article

    «En ese momento, otro grupo de tres hombres, de entre 30 y 35 años, que iban armados, se acercó a ellos y les insultó tras comprobar que a su alrededor no había agentes policiales.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-7HT8GG · PDF · Turing compares to what we have documented (a minimum count). We don't say “false” - if it doesn't match, we show you the evidence. See a mistake?

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-PD6Z-ASE9

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 9, 2026, 16:57:14 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-PD6Z-ASE9 Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 9, 2026, 16:57:14 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 9, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 10, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 9, 2026, 22:58 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy ce8bb8af756702503c5577149d71a04c69a8970f560a1039bd767c8a76cb3677

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Grupo Zócalo
Published
May 30, 2021
Last analyzed
November 9, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Fuera de México

It is foreign press: we keep it for the statistics on LGBTTTIQANB+ people, but it is not a Memoria y Resistencia case.

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 9, 2026 · 485 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.