Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Violencia LGBTfóbica

letraese

How is it written?

Good writing

La nota es respetuosa en general, con algunos detalles por mejorar. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de violencia por prejuicio, nombra el transfeminicidio, nombra el feminicidio. 2 expresiones aparecen citadas o denunciadas y no cuentan.

In the cross-cutting issues

  • Gender-based violence Bad news Counts harm to people in gender-based violence. Mexico City
  • HIV and AIDS Informative Report on the topic without a clear fact for or against. Mexico City

Turing reads it apart from the grade: the grade measures how it is written; this shows what counts in each topic. See all issues.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Outlet
letraese
Analyzed
November 10, 2026
State
Online
Leer en letraese.jornada.com.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

letraese letraese.jornada.com.mx

Violencia LGBTfóbica

abc Name and gender abc Quoted or analyzed (does not count) abc What it does well abc Inclusive language

El asesinato de la activist trans Ivanna Divina Jhons expone las múltiples dimensiones que caracterizan a la violencia y el prejuicio contra the people LGBTQ+ en México. Durante, 2023 se documentó el asesinato de, al menos, 66 personas de la sexual diversity. Su asesinato, al igual que los demás, exponen los alcances letales que tiene el prejuicio contra aquellas personas LGBTQ+ que, como Ivanna, buscan salir adelante, conquistar espacios comunitarios y luchar por sus derechos.

Con este informe, Letra S busca exponer las prácticas violentas que intentan eliminar a the people sexodiversas de esta matriz de legibilidad. Para ello, se detallan las condiciones, los contextos y situaciones que caracterizan estos hechos violentos, como una forma de comprender y hacer inteligible la existencia de estas personas, incluso desde su muerte.

… armas punzocortantes. Los cadáveres fueron abandonados en bolsas negras de plástico. Al respecto, la Fiscalía de la Ciudad de México dio a conocer la captura de los presuntos responsables Rosa Itzel, Martha del Rosario y Carlos Alberto Valdez, en la alcaldía Gustavo A. Madero. Las dos mujeres fueron trasladadas al Reclusorio Preventivo Femenil Santa Martha Acatitla, mientras que Men2 (see point 2 in the analysis) fue llevado1 (see entry 1 in the analysis) al reclusorio Norte, donde quedaron a disposición de la autoridad judicial.

Otro dato central para comprender la violencia LGBTfóbica en México está en la creciente situación de violencia que viven the people defensoras de procedures. Durante 2023 se documentó el asesinato de 7 defensores, de los cuales 5 eran hombres gay, una trans woman y una persona muxe. Mientras que en 2022 esta cifra fue de 6 casos y en 2021 tan sólo 3.

En este informe se ha identificado al arma de fuego como el arma letal más común para estos casos, con 34 de 66 casos, representando el 51.5% de la cifra total. En segundo lugar, estuvieron las armas blancas o filosas con 8 casos, es decir, el 12%. Cabe destacar que, el arma de fuego predominó en la mayoría de los casos ocurridos, independientemente de la sexual orientation o gender identity, situación que no se había observado hasta este momento.

The informe elaborado por Letra S expone la brutalidad con la que se cometen muchos de los asesinatos de personas LGBTQ+. Estos hechos se caracterizan por manifestar en múltiples formas y a través de diferentes medios el prejucio contra las víctimas. De los 66 casos documentados, en al menos 8 casos se identificó una combinación de violencias que potencializan la brutalidad de los asesinatos. Se pudo dar cuenta de casos de cuerpos mutilados, maniatados, con evidencias de tortura, de acuerdo con la información recabada por los medios de comunicación.

Para finalizar, con el objetivo de visibilizar las múltiples dimensiones de la bias-motivated violence vs. the people LGBTQ+, Letra S analizó parte de la información registrada por la organización Amicus a través de su sistema de información Visible, una plataforma en línea que permite reportar incidentes de violencia y discriminación cometidos hacia the people LGBT en México.

Con este informe se exhorta al Estado mexicano a atender las recomendaciones de organismos internacionales de procedures que determinan como necesaria la creación de mecanismos de información y record de la violencia ejercida en contra de the people LGBT. Esto nos permitirá analizar en profundidad la violencia que viven the people sexo-diversas, pero, sobre todo, identificar patrones, condiciones recurrentes y elementos para prevenir, en la medida de lo posible, que la violencia haga de nosotros …

The rating

How Turing arrived at 84

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language

La nota es respetuosa en general, con algunos detalles por mejorar. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de violencia por prejuicio, nombra el transfeminicidio, nombra el feminicidio. 2 expresiones aparecen citadas o denunciadas y no cuentan.

Context pieceGives data, background or analysis. Strong expressions that it only describes or attributes to the press do not count.

Text by 2023 (for the dates you mention)

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender Leve · 2 señalamientos · resta 9
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 14 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 84 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Name and gender−9
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. Inclusive language+5
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−11
  6. It misgenders the person: it cannot be “Very good”−11
  7. Rating84

Esta nota nombra a una persona del registro de memoria. We check whether it names Ivanna Divina Jhons with their name and gender, as stated in the record. The legal name is never shown.

Turing related it to what the site already knows

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighbors1 time
  • Collectives and organizations1 time
  • ExpertsNo

What is worth changing

  1. Name and gender …al Reclusorio Preventivo Femenil Santa Martha Acatitla, mientras que el hombre fue llevado al reclusorio Norte, donde quedaron a disposición de la autoridad judicial. · A lo largo… See it in the text Why we flag it: Cambiar el género de una persona trans dentro de la misma nota niega su identidad. El Glosario de CONAPRED (2016) y las guías para periodistas piden nombrarla siempre con el género con que vivía, también cuando la nota cuenta que la trasladaron, la atendieron o la identificaron. The article names her as a trans woman and here it uses the masculine. Write “fue trasladada”, “fue atendida”, “fue identificada”. It says fue llevadoBetter sayfue trasladadafue atendidafue identificada
  2. Name and gender · review …fueron trasladadas al Reclusorio Preventivo Femenil Santa Martha Acatitla, mientras que Men fue llevado al reclusorio Norte, donde quedaron a disposición de la autoridad… See it in the text Check whether it refers to the victim in the masculine. If she was a trans woman or travesti, use the feminine.

What the article quotes, denounces or attributes to other people

These expressions appear in textual quotations, as terms that the text examines or in words of other people that the note reports or points out as an offense. Naming them to report or denounce them is not using them, so they do not count in the rating.

  • Amarillismo · como término …potencializan la brutalidad de los asesinatos. Se pudo dar cuenta de casos de cuerpos mutilados, maniatados, con evidencias de tortura, de acuerdo con la información recabada por los…
  • Amarillismo · como término …la brutalidad de los asesinatos. Se pudo dar cuenta de casos de cuerpos mutilados, maniatados, con evidencias de tortura, de acuerdo con la información recabada por los medios de…

What it does well

  • Talks about prejudice-based violence
  • Names transfemicide
  • Names femicide
  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Names discrimination
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Respects the presumption of innocence
  • Names muxe identity
  • Gives context with data

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

In the Memorial

This article is connected to stories we have already documented.

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-5K3S-HG72

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 10, 2026, 12:15:06 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-5K3S-HG72 Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 10, 2026, 12:15:06 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress) It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 467219f4f654ccfa10d6570239af97ee961a0922b54007b7e3d25ee9c1299564

The link no longer opened: Turing read it from the Internet Archive copy.

Record

About the note

Data

Outlet
letraese
Last analyzed
November 10, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.