Skip to content
Turing

Analysis of the article

Expide Congreso Ley para el reconocimiento y protección a comunidad LGBTTTIQ+

congresosinaloa.gob.mx

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la orientación sexual, nombra la expresión de género, habla de diversidad sexual.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Analyzed
November 10, 2026
State
Online
Leer en congresosinaloa.gob.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

congresosinaloa.gob.mx

abc What it does well abc Inclusive language

Expide Congreso Ley para el reconocimiento y protección a comunidad LGBTTTIQ+

Culiacán, Sinaloa, a 06 de octubre de 2026.- Diputadas y diputados del Congreso del Estado de Sinaloa aprobaron por mayoría este martes en Sesión Ordinaria expedir la Ley para el Reconocimiento, Protección y Atención de las Personas LGBTTTIQ+, de la Diversidad Sexual y de Género del Estado de Sinaloa.

Esta ley (que recibió 31 votos a favor, 3 en contra y 3 abstenciones), establece mecanismos de coordinación entre autoridades estatales y municipales; así como las bases de actuación de los Poderes Legislativo y Judicial, y de los organismos constitucionales autónomos para promover, proteger y garantizar de forma progresiva el pleno ejercicio de los procedures y libertades de the people LGBTTTIQ+, de la sexual diversity y de género.

Asimismo, regula las acciones que, con base en sus competencias, las dependencias de la administración pública estatal, deberán implementar para el desarrollo progresivo de los derechos de the people LGBTTTIQ+, de la sexual diversity y de género.

Asimismo, se establecen varios derechos para the people - sexual diversity, que son los siguientes:

*Derecho a la libertad, a la identidad, al libre desarrollo de la personalidad, a la integridad y, a la seguridad personal y colectiva.

También se prohíbe que se promuevan contratos, tratamientos, terapias o servicios, tareas o actividades que pretendan corregir la sexual orientation, identidad o expresión de género, y todos los esfuerzos encaminados en esta materia que atenten contra el libre desarrollo de la personalidad e identidad sexual de the people.

De igual manera se establece que el Gobierno del Estado incluya en su Plan Estatal de Desarrollo, la creación, aprobación e implementación de un Programa Estatal para el reconocimiento, protección y atención de the people LGBTTTIQ+, de la sexual diversity y de género del estado, el cual será propuesto por la persona titular de la Secretaría General de Gobierno.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la orientación sexual, nombra la expresión de género, habla de diversidad sexual.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 (for the dates you mention)

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 6 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+10
  3. Inclusive language+5
  4. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

Turing related it to what the site already knows

What it does well

  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names gender expression
  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

Since this article talks about of legislators, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

  • Diputación local de Sinaloa · Morena

    Juana Minerva Vázquez González No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Sinaloa · Morena

    Karla Daniela Ulloa Rodríguez No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Sinaloa · Morena

    Almendra Ernestina Negrete Sánchez No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-5DG5-8XQK

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 10, 2026, 15:50:11 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-5DG5-8XQK Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 10, 2026, 15:50:11 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy to Ghostarchive In line for Ghostarchive.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 10, 2026. We check it from time to time.

GHOSTARCHIVE · ghostarchive.org

In line for Ghostarchive

Turing keeps it in Ghostarchive, a public and independent archive. It goes one at a time, so as not to saturate it, and what has sayings goes first; the link appears here as soon as it is saved. Meanwhile, the copy is already valid with your fingerprint and time stamps.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy baa53fa28ed7717701f7d747fc15d8f89fc71a3d7dd5cd63898d7e2aafd1008f

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That's why every copy uses open standards that anyone can check without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin, and Ghostarchive's standalone copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Last analyzed
November 10, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 10, 2026 · 438 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.