Skip to content
Turing

Analysis of the article

Se registraron tres crímenes de odio contra la comunidad de la diversidad sexual en 2025

Grupo Milenio · published on May 26, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+.

In the cross-cutting issues

Turing reads it apart from the grade: the grade measures how it is written; this shows what counts in each topic. See all issues.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
May 26, 2026
Analyzed
November 10, 2026
State
Online
Leer en milenio.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

Grupo Milenio milenio.com

By Alejandro Reyes ·

abc What it does well abc Inclusive language

Se registraron tres hate crimes vs. community development. - sexual diversity in 2025

Tras dar a conocer los pormenores de la marcha del orgullo LGBTTTIQ+ en su edición número 26, integrantes de la sexual diversity señalaron que tan solo en 2025 se registraron tres hate crimes. Arlan Cruz Olvera, regidor de Pachuca e integrante del comité organizador de la marcha, indicó que el año pasado se registraron tres hate crimes vs. community development. - sexual diversity en el municipio de Ixmiquilpan y la zona de Tula.En conferencia de prensa mencionó que estos casos se encuentran en proceso de investigación por parte de la Procuraduría General de Justicia del Estado de Hidalgo (PGJEH).Respecto a los casos de personas de la sexual diversity desaparecidas, dijo desconocer cuántos casos se tienen en la entidad, aunque apuntó que se trabaja con la Comisión de Búsqueda de Personas Desaparecidas del Estado de Hidalgo (CBPEH) para que en las fichas de búsqueda se respete su condición.Cabe mencionar que Hidalgo registra la desaparición de una persona de community development. LGBTIQ + entre 2017 y 2024, de acuerdo con el Report sobre desapariciones en México 2026, elaborado por la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH). De acuerdo con el documento, entre el 17 de noviembre de 2017 y el 4 de junio de 2024, la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos recibió información de 43 casos de personas LGBTIQ + desaparecidas en México, en 13 estados del país, entre ellos uno de Hidalgo. La marcha Este martes en el balcón del Reloj Monumental, en Plaza Independencia de la ciudad de Pachuca, se anunció la edición número 26 de la marcha del orgullo LGBTTTIQ+, la cual rendirá un homenaje a aquellas personas que resistieron ante los señalamientos y críticas por formar parte de la sexual diversity.La marcha se llevará a cabo el próximo sábado 6 de junio, tendrá como salida y llegada el Reloj de la Plaza Independencia y se espera contar con la participación de mil 500 personas, la misma cantidad que en 2025.De acuerdo con los organizadores se prevé la participación de integrantes de community development. - sexual diversity de los municipios de Pachuca, Actopan, Ixmiquilpan, Tulancingo de Bravo, Villa de Tezontepec, además de la Ciudad de México, el Estado de México y Puebla.La marcha saldrá de Plaza Independencia, seguirá por la calle C. Doria, Vicente Guerrero, continuará por avenida Juárez, hará una parada en la Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Estado de Hidalgo (CDHEH), de ahí avanzará por la calle de José María Iglesias, dará vuelta en avenida Revolución para volver nuevamente a Plaza …

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+.

Context pieceGives data, background or analysis. Strong expressions that it only describes or attributes to the press do not count.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 8 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+10
  3. Inclusive language+5
  4. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

Turing related it to what the site already knows

  • Grupo Milenio · Observatorio de Medios · 50 notas · promedio 96 de 100

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities1 time
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations1 time
  • ExpertsNo

What it does well

  • Names the hate crime
  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Names discrimination
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives context with data
  • Offers a contact for help or institutions
  • Helps the search

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

Topic: Hate crimes and trans femicides

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-MPKB-CJQ4

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 10, 2026, 16:10:08 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-MPKB-CJQ4 Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 10, 2026, 16:10:08 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 10, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 10, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 10, 2026, 22:35 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 25be0ca3d1e8862b2eaaef5b8d63fcbfb400a7864fa938d9c2372b6206e2aa41

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Alejandro Reyes
Published
May 26, 2026
Last analyzed
November 10, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 10, 2026 · 418 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.