Skip to content

Analysis of the article

La Corte deja firme el castigo a terapias de conversión en Chiapas

Alerta Chiapas · published on July 16, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual, nombra la expresión de género. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
July 16, 2026
Analyzed
November 10, 2026
State
Online
Leer en alertachiapas.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

Alerta Chiapas alertachiapas.com

La Corte deja firme el castigo a terapias de conversión en Chiapas

By Alerta Chiapas ·

abc What it does well «…» Direct quote

Cada vez que una organización de procedures en Chiapas documenta un caso de “terapia de conversión”, el patrón se repite: una familia que descubre la sexual orientation or the gender identity de una hija o un hijo y, en vez de acompañarlo, lo entrega a un pastor, un consejero o un pariente para que lo “corrija”. A veces son oraciones forzadas durante días. A veces, encierro. El resultado documentado por campaigners LGBTI+ en el estado es siempre el mismo: daño psicológico y, con frecuencia, silencio.

… del Estado publicó el 8 de julio de 2026 la resolución completa y los votos de la Acción de Inconstitucionalidad 79/2025, promovida por la Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos (CNDH) contra el artículo 326 Bis del código penal chiapaneco, el que castiga las terapias de conversión.

… realice, imparta, aplique, obligue o financie cualquier tratamiento, terapia o práctica que busque obstaculizar, restringir, impedir, menoscabar, anular o suprimir la sexual orientation, identidad o expresión de género de una persona. La pena se duplica si quien comete el delito tiene con la víctima una relación laboral, docente, médica o doméstica, o si se vale de un cargo …

The CNDH impugnó ante la Suprema Corte justamente esas dos porciones: la palabra doméstica como agravante, por considerarla ambigua, y la sanción conjunta de destitución e inhabilitación, por considerarla desproporcionada.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 98

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual, nombra la expresión de género. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 7 strengths
Inclusive language Not applicable
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+10
  3. Only gives voice to the authorities−3
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−9
  5. Rating98

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities1 time
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • ExpertsNo

It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names gender expression
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Offers a contact for help or institutions

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-23F6-M9G3

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 10, 2026, 20:00:08 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-23F6-M9G3 Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 10, 2026, 20:00:08 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (done) Saved on November 11, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy on the Internet Archive (opens in another tab)
  5. 5. Monitoring (done) It was still online on November 10, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 11, 2026, 02:00 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 596b5f6ea0bec945323b6e8b6b1e48d078a6c89bd0730dbb81466b18a592a0f3

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Alerta Chiapas
Published
July 16, 2026
Last analyzed
November 10, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 98Version 1 · November 10, 2026 · 683 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.