Skip to content

Analysis of the article

México: 97 crímenes de odio en un año

La Verdad Juárez · published on December 9, 2025

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, habla de violencia por prejuicio, nombra el feminicidio.

In the cross-cutting issues

Turing reads it apart from the grade: the grade measures how it is written; this shows what counts in each topic. See all issues.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
December 9, 2025
Analyzed
November 11, 2026
State
Online
Leer en laverdadjuarez.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. La franja ámbar con señala lo que va contra nuestros derechos. The other underlines are wording details; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we flagged it.

La Verdad Juárez laverdadjuarez.com

México: 97 crímenes de odio en un año

By Rocio Gallegos ·

abc Goes against our rights abc Blames the victim abc Sensationalism abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Ciudad de México- El Observatory Nacional de Crímenes de Odio Contra Personas LGBT registered este año 97 asesinatos de personas de community development., con indicios de motivación por prejuicio u hatred. La mayoría de estas víctimas fueron trans women, con 57 casos, seguidas por 30 hombres gays, tres mujeres lesbianas y también crímenes contra hombres trans, hombres bisexuales y personas no binarias.

Goes against our rights: “No hablamos de números, sino de vidas borradas con tortura, mutilaciones, exposición de cuerpos, mensajes de hatred. No son hechos aislados, son violencias que buscan no solo matar, sino borrar identidades y enviar un mensaje brutish2 (see point 2 in the analysis) de intolerancia. Es violencia estructural, normalizada e impune. Son las consecuencias de visiones institucionales acumuladas a lo largo del tiempo. Pero hoy es …

… exclusiones y la violencia estructural que heredamos, colocando la dignidad humana en el centro”, afirmó la senadora Karina Isabel Ruiz Ruiz en la presentación del informe Nuestras Vidas Cuentan en las instalaciones del Senado de la República el 3 de noviembre.

Gloria Careaga, coordinadora general de Fundación Arcoíris, comenta que la creación del Observatory de Crímenes contra Personas LGBT en 2018 fue un parteaguas: “Participamos en la evaluación que se hizo al gobierno de México con respecto a la situación de los procedures en nuestro país, enviamos el informe paralelo al Consejo de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas, e hicimos un trabajo de gestión muy importante con distintas embajadas tanto de América Latina como de Europa. Afortunadamente, resultado de ese trabajo, logramos que siete gobiernos hicieran recomendaciones a nuestro país y que entre ellas estuviera precisamente la protección de the people LGBT”, relata.

En la actualidad, han estado tocando la puerta del INEGI para que la sexual orientation y la gender identity se sumen a las categorías de análisis de las investigaciones de la ley. “Queremos ser parte del Plan Nacional de Gobierno y que las cifras que aportamos den sustento a las políticas públicas que necesitamos para que realmente haya acciones de gobierno contundentes para mejorar la vida de the people LGBT”, afirmó Careaga.

En México, a nivel institucional, a pesar de avances clave como la prohibición de las terapias de conversión en el país, la tipificación de crímenes por prejuicio y la tipificación del femicide, feminicide en Ciudad de México y Nayarit, el informe destaca y evidencia la falta de armonización normativa a nivel nacional, la ausencia de registros oficiales desagregados por sexual orientation e gender identity, la inexistencia de protocolos obligatorios con enfoque LGBT, las deficiencias en políticas de salud mental y prevención del suicidio y omisiones graves por parte de fiscalías y comisiones de procedures.

“Históricamente, estos elementos han sido y son motores de la violencia. Las instituciones no solo fallan en prevenir, sino que reproducen prejuicios. El informe documenta casos donde autoridades clasifican asesinatos como crímenes pasionales1 (see entry 1 in the analysis) sin investigar, donde las desapariciones se registran sin respetar la ley de gender identity y donde las familias sociales, que son fundamentales para nuestras comunidades LGBT, son desconocidas por el Estado”, advirtió el experto.

Por otra parte, en el análisis de los crímenes por prejuicio, the informe suma la complejidad del territorio: las entidades con mayor incidencia —Ciudad de México, Veracruz, Jalisco, Morelos, Michoacán y Guanajuato— muestran que la bias-motivated violence no es un fenómeno local, sino nacional. Sin embargo, en cada región hay factores propios como el crimen organizado, la violencia misógina y transfóbica normalizada, …

The rating

How Turing arrived at 97

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, habla de violencia por prejuicio, nombra el feminicidio.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2025 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim Mild · 1 pointing · subtraction 3
Sensationalism Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 2
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 16 strengths
Inclusive language 100%

How to read this rating

  • It has a yellowish detail, shown below. They take points off, but they are not enough to call it a “sensationalist article”: that happens when sensationalism sets the tone of the whole article. In the statistics it counts among articles “with some sensationalist detail”.
  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 97 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Blames the victim−3
  3. Sensationalism−2
  4. Gender and rights perspective+10
  5. Inclusive language+5
  6. Says where to seek help (suicide)+2
  7. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−15
  8. Rating97

Turing related it to what the site already knows

What is worth changing

  1. Culpa a la víctima · en palabras de otros …prejuicios. El informe documenta casos donde autoridades clasifican asesinatos como crímenes pasionales sin investigar, donde las desapariciones se registran sin respetar la ley de identidad… See it in the text The Supreme Court’s Protocol points out that “crime of passion” hides prejudice-based violence. Write “murder” and mention whether it’s being investigated as a hate crime. It says crímenes pasionalesBetter sayasesinato
  2. Amarillismo · en una cita …son violencias que buscan no solo matar, sino borrar identidades y enviar un mensaje brutish de intolerancia. Es violencia estructural, normalizada e impune. Son las consecuencias… See it in the text It aims for shock value. Describe the facts soberly.

What it does well

  • Names the hate crime
  • Talks about prejudice-based violence
  • Names femicide
  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names gender expression
  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”
  • Names non-binary people
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Names discrimination
  • Human rights approach
  • Mentions action protocols
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Gives context with data
  • Offers mental health support
  • Recognizes diverse families

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Talk about this initiative

Legislative observatory

Como esta nota habla de una iniciativa y de una persona legisladora, la registramos en automático en el Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Reconocimiento de la identidad de género · Prohibición de las terapias de conversión (ECOSIG)

  • Bill · Senate of the Republic

    Investigar crímenes de odio contra grupos vulnerables, incluidas personas trans

    The AI found that the note speaks to this initiative. The note already appears on your page.

    See the bill
  • Senaduría de la República · Morena

    Karina Isabel Ruiz Ruiz No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

Other voices in the article

  • Otra voz · coordinadora general de Fundación Arcoíris

    Gloria Careaga In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Queremos ser parte del Plan Nacional de Gobierno y que las cifras que aportamos den sustento a las políticas públicas que necesitamos...”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill
  • Otra voz · coordinador del Observatorio

    Kenlly Pacheco In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Lo que hoy presentamos con todas, todos y todes busca transformar el dolor en exigencia y en políticas públicas.”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill
  • Otra voz · historiador especializado en violencia política

    Camilo Vicente Ovalle In favor Speaks respectfully

    “la tipificación nacional de los delitos por prejuicio basados en la orientación sexual, identidad y expresión de género es fundamental”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill
  • Another voice

    asociaciones de la sociedad civil In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Se une a expertos y asociaciones de la sociedad civil en exigir registros oficiales sólidos, investigaciones con perspectiva de diversidad...”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-ZZYG-AU7P

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 04:58:06 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-ZZYG-AU7P Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 04:58:06 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy to Ghostarchive (in progress) In line for Ghostarchive.
  5. 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

GHOSTARCHIVE · ghostarchive.org

In line for Ghostarchive

Turing keeps it in Ghostarchive, a public and independent archive. It goes one at a time, so as not to saturate it, and what has sayings goes first; the link appears here as soon as it is saved. Meanwhile, the copy is already valid with your fingerprint and time stamps.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 0e606dd2585189ea18306aea98dd8976cfec6c04e28691165fbaf953b5bd9238

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Rocio Gallegos
Published
December 9, 2025
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Saved versions

  • 97Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 1,258 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.