Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Equipo mexicano de lesbianas gana campeonato de futbol en Estados Unidos

La Neta Noticias · published on January 30, 2019

How is it written?

Very good writing

The article uses respectful language.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
January 30, 2019
Analyzed
November 11, 2026
State
Online
Leer en lanetanoticias.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

La Neta Noticias lanetanoticias.com

Equipo mexicano de lesbianas gana campeonato de futbol en Estados Unidos

By LNN Redacción ·

abc What it does well abc Inclusive language

… femenil Sin City Classic 2019. Del 17 al 20 de enero se llevó a cabo en Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos, el Sin City Classic 2019, una de las competencias deportivas LGBT más grande del mundo con competencias en 20 diferentes deportes y participaron cerca de 6 mil 200 atletas. En el torneo de fútbol participaron cuatro equipos mexicanos, se trata de Lobos, Zorros LGBT, Azktl y Didesex; y precisamente fue este último equipo el que ganó el campeonato Sin City Soccer Classic 2019 en su categoría femenil. Didesex lo conforman mujeres …

… mientras que una deus imtegrantes, Jessica Ahedo, obtuvo el premio a la mejor jugadora del torneo. El coordinador deportivo de los equipos de futbol pertenecientes a community development. LGBT, Iván Lara, informó que era la primera vez que un equipo de lesbianas participaba en un torneo como este. Es la primera vez que se hace el torneo de mujeres, eso es …

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2019 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 1 strength
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+2
  3. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations1 time
  • ExpertsNo

What it does well

  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-RUBY-VZMN

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 05:40:09 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-RUBY-VZMN Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 05:40:09 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (done) Saved on November 11, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy on the Internet Archive (opens in another tab)
  5. 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 11, 2026, 11:49 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 9eff930ee6e85e9cf8fa99553bf36cb4a70603fb74b3290160a368b69021fd03

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
LNN Redacción
Published
January 30, 2019
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 312 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.