Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Diputada de Durango propone tipificar los crímenes de odio, ¿de qué se trata?

blown post · published on October 12, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual.

In the cross-cutting issues

Turing reads it apart from the grade: the grade measures how it is written; this shows what counts in each topic. See all issues.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
October 12, 2026
Analyzed
November 11, 2026
State
Online
Read at posta.com.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. La franja ámbar con señala lo que va contra nuestros derechos. The other underlines are wording details; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we flagged it.

blown post posta.com.mx

By Citlalli Zoe ·

abc Goes against our rights abc Imprecise term abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Diputada de Durango propone tipificar los hate crimes, ¿de qué se trata?

La diputada Delia Enríquez Arriaga, de Morena, presentó una iniciativa que busca incorporar al Código Penal del Estado el delito de hate crimes por sexual orientation, Orientation, Sexual1 (see entry 1 in the analysis) o gender identity, con sanciones específicas para quienes priven de la vida a una persona por estos motivos. Durante la exposición de motivos, la legisladora sostuvo que la identidad y la sexual orientation de una persona no deben convertirse en razones para sufrir agresiones o perder la vida. “Ser lesbiana, gay, bisexual o trans jamás debe convertirse en una razón para ser perseguido, agredido o asesinado”, expresó. ¿Qué penas contempla la iniciativa por hate crimes? La propuesta legislativa establece penas de 22 a 50 años de prisión cuando se prive de la vida a una persona por motivos relacionados con su sexual orientation, Orientation, Sexual1 (see entry 1 in the analysis) o gender identity. Asimismo, plantea sanciones de 30 a 55 años de cárcel cuando se presenten determinadas circunstancias agravantes, entre ellas la existencia de relaciones de pareja, parentesco, trabajo, docencia, subordinación o superioridad entre la víctima y el agresor. La iniciativa fue turnada para su estudio a la Comisión de Justicia. ¿Cómo se identificarían los posibles hate crimes? Entre las circunstancias planteadas para identificar la posible comisión de este delito se encuentran las amenazas o el acoso previos, la violencia sexual, las lesiones degradantes, la incomunicación de la víctima y la exposición de su cuerpo. Goes against our rights: También se consideran las expresiones de hatred o rechazo por parte del agresor relacionadas con la sexual orientation o gender identity de la persona fallecida. La propuesta señala que, cuando no se acredite la motivación de hatred, se aplicarían las disposiciones penales correspondientes, de acuerdo con las características del caso. Enríquez Arriaga explicó que contar con estos elementos permitiría fortalecer las investigaciones y evitar que se descarte una posible motivación discriminatoria sin analizar las circunstancias de cada homicidio. Delia Enríquez llama a combatir la violencia contra community development. LGBTIQ + Como presidenta de la Comisión de Igualdad de Género y vocal de las comisiones de Justicia y Derechos Humanos, la diputada señaló que la protección de las mujeres y de community development. LGBTIQ + parte del mismo principio: combatir la violencia basada en prejuicios, desigualdad y rechazo. “Ninguna persona debe perder la vida por ser quien es, por la persona …

… posibles motivaciones discriminatorias y garantizar el acceso a la justicia para las víctimas y sus familias. Además, sostuvo que el reconocimiento específico de los hate crimes permitiría ofrecer una respuesta institucional más clara frente a los homicidios cometidos por intolerancia. Reportan más de 59 asesinatos de personas LGBTQ+ durante 2025 Para dimensionar el problema, Enríquez Arriaga citó cifras del Observatory de Crímenes LGBTQ+, según las cuales durante 2025 se documentaron más de 59 asesinatos de personas pertenecientes a esta comunidad. Ante este panorama, destacó la importancia de que cada caso sea investigado con seriedad para esclarecer los hechos, determinar si existió una motivación de hatred o discriminación y evitar que las familias de las víctimas queden sin respuestas. La diputada llamó a continuar trabajando para que la dignidad, la igualdad y el respeto a los procedures se reflejen tanto en las leyes como en la actuación de las instituciones.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 94

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el crimen de odio, nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms Grave · 1 señalamiento · resta 12

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 7 strengths
Inclusive language 100%

How to read this rating

  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 94 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Imprecise terms−12
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. Inclusive language+5
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−9
  6. Rating94

Turing related it to what the site already knows

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations2 times
  • ExpertsNo

What is worth changing

  1. Inaccurate terms · 2 times …al Código Penal del Estado el delito de crímenes de odio por orientación sexual, Orientation, Sexual o identidad de género, con sanciones específicas para quienes priven de la vida a una… See it in the text Why we flag it: Article 1 of the Constitution and Supreme Court criteria prior to 2015 say “sexual preferences”; today the Supreme Court, in its 2022 Protocol, and the Inter-American Court use “sexual orientation”. Use “sexual orientation”: it isn’t an option or a preference. It says Orientation, SexualBetter saysexual orientation

What it does well

  • Names the hate crime
  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Names discrimination
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives context with data

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislators quoted

What they said counts in their Legislative Observatory evaluation. Each position passed a verification: the quote is in the article, it belongs to this person and a second AI review agrees.

Talk about this initiative

Legislative observatory

Como esta nota habla de una iniciativa y de una persona legisladora, la registramos en automático en el Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Reconocimiento de la identidad de género · Crímenes de odio y transfeminicidios

  • Bill · Durango

    Tipificación de los crímenes de odio por orientación sexual o identidad de género

    The AI found that the note speaks to this initiative. The note already appears on your page.

    See the bill
  • Diputación local de Durango · Morena

    Delia Leticia Enríquez Arriaga In favor Speaks respectfully

    “Ser lesbiana, gay, bisexual o trans jamás debe convertirse en una razón para ser perseguido, agredido o asesinado”

    Reviewed by the team and published on their record. It counts in their evaluation.

    See their record See the bill

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-CY9H-VPWE

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 05:55:23 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-CY9H-VPWE Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 05:55:23 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy to Ghostarchive (in progress) In line for Ghostarchive.
  5. 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

GHOSTARCHIVE · ghostarchive.org

In line for Ghostarchive

Turing keeps it in Ghostarchive, a public and independent archive. It goes one at a time, so as not to saturate it, and what has sayings goes first; the link appears here as soon as it is saved. Meanwhile, the copy is already valid with your fingerprint and time stamps.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 2d99759a120e0156c5fb93e0c6322b133886aa82052634254b0c62ed16babf77

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Citlalli Zoe
Published
October 12, 2026
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Saved versions

  • 94Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 554 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.