Skip to content
Turing

Analysis of the article

Presentan 21° Festival Cultural de la Diversidad Sexual Zacatecas 2026

Gobierno del Estado de Zacatecas · published on June 12, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, enfoque de derechos humanos.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
June 12, 2026
Analyzed
November 11, 2026
State
Online
Leer en zacatecas.gob.mx PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

Gobierno del Estado de Zacatecas zacatecas.gob.mx

By usertest_www_rediseno ·

abc What it does well abc Inclusive language

Presentan 21° Festival Cultural de la Diversidad Sexual Zacatecas 2026

Dan a conocer actividades alternas, como la Feria Social y del Orgullo, además de la ya tradicional Marcha LGBTIQ +, por parte de los diferentes groups de Zacatecas

Zacatecas, Zac., 12 de junio de 2026.- Con el objetivo de promover el respeto, la tolerancia y la aceptación de la sexual diversity en todas sus manifestaciones, así como contribuir a la construcción de una sociedad libre de discriminación, mediante el arte, la reflexión y el diálogo, fue presentado el 21° Festival Cultural de la Diversidad Sexual, además de actividades alternas que desarrollarán distintos groups zacatecanos.

Muñoz Reyes estuvo acompañada del Secretario de Turismo, Le Roy Barragán Ocampo; Paz Barrón Delgado, directora de la Marcha LGBTIQ +; Corina Leyva, representante de Transformando Vidas, y por parte del Coletivo Hij@s de la Luna, Sara Ortiz García, quienes detallaron aspectos de las actividades que, de manera alterna, se desarrollarán en la capital zacatecana.

… el Centro Estatal de las Artes Zacatecas, 21 Shorts México: Festival Internacional de Cortometrajes en México, el Sistema Zacatecano de Radio y Televisión, el Collective Hij@s de la Luna A.C., Sangre de Tuna, Red Zacatecana de la Diversidad Sexo Genérica, el Collective Lésbico Feminista de Zacatecas A.C., así como las editoriales Fondo de Cultura Económica y Tierra Adentro, de la Secretaría de Cultura del Gobierno de México.

Este Festival surgió en 2006, por iniciativa del Collective Hij@s de la Luna, con el respaldo del Gobierno del Estado, a través del IZC; a la fecha, se ha convertido en uno de los pocos proyectos de esta naturaleza en México que reciben apoyo institucional para su realización.

La marcha -dijo- hoy por hoy es un programa muy grande, integral, que ofrece muchas actividades. “Empezamos desde el viernes 17 de julio, a las 9:00 de la mañana, en Plaza de Armas, con la Feria Social y del Orgullo LGBTIQ +, como acción comunitaria, la recuperación del espacio público y el acercar a community development. distintos servicios, a través de 50 módulos.

Se contará con una programación plural e incluyente, la participación activa de instituciones, artistas, groups y ciudadanía; este Festival refrenda su vocación como un espacio de encuentro, expresión y reflexión que fortalece el respeto a los procedures y la construcción de una sociedad más justa e igualitaria, a través del arte y la cultura.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, enfoque de derechos humanos.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 4 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+8
  3. Inclusive language+5
  4. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

What it does well

  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-HKRY-WTUC

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 08:59:24 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-HKRY-WTUC Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 08:59:24 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 11, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 11, 2026, 14:55 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 6b4c4c8b5c27051dc64b975114e443349a2f7eb839ef69f4a0d735a14b3dd27e

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
usertest_www_rediseno
Published
June 12, 2026
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 698 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.