Skip to content

Analysis of the article

PAN abre la puerta al matrimonio igualitario en Aguascalientes, señala diputada

Yahoo Noticias · published on December 22, 2025

The most important

¿Qué pasó?

Good news for the community

It reports progress in rights.

Ver dónde lo dice

Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.

¿Cómo lo contó el medio?

Very good

The article uses respectful language.

¿Qué puedo hacer?

Guardamos una prueba de que existió tal como la leímos · Reference number CC-GBUR-VE7P

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. La nota marcada
  3. Qué cambiar y qué hace bien
  4. ¿Es cierto lo que dice? 5
  5. Who speaks
  6. See a mistake?
  7. Para saber más

La nota marcada

Los párrafos donde encontramos algo

The amber strip with es lo que va contra nuestros derechos. Lo demás subrayado es la forma de nombrar. Toca una marca para ver por qué. No copiamos la nota completa.

Yahoo Noticias es-us.noticias.yahoo.com

PAN abre la puerta al matrimonio igualitario en Aguascalientes, señala diputada

By Sofía Galaviz NW Noticias Aguascalientes ·

abc Goes against our rights abc What it does well «…» Direct quote

Goes against our rights: Medina Macías destacó las declaraciones hechas en octubre por el dirigente nacional del PAN, Jorge Romero, quien afirmó que su partido ya no se opone al matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo y que cuestionó públicamente: "¿Quién puede estar ya en contra de eso?".

Cabe recordar que el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo es legal en Aguascalientes desde 2019 y se realiza de manera directa en el Record Civil sin necesidad de amparo, luego de que la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (SCJN) declarara inconstitucionales los artículos que lo limitaban.

Qué cambiar y qué hace bien

What it does well

Cómo se calculó el 100 está en Para saber más.

Very good

  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2025 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 1 strength
Inclusive language Not applicable
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+2
  3. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

Turing related it to what the site already knows

What it does well

  • Gives context with data

¿Es cierto lo que dice?

¿Es cierto lo que dice la nota?

Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.

5 cosas que todavía no podemos comprobar
  1. The article

    «Medina Macías destacó las declaraciones hechas en octubre por el dirigente nacional del PAN, Jorge Romero, quien afirmó que su partido ya no se opone al matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo y que cuestionó públicamente: "¿Quién puede estar ya en contra de eso?".»

    Todavía no lo podemos comprobar

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence
  2. The article

    «No es un tema de considerar ahorita, pero yo creo que es un gran paso que nuestro dirigente nacional haya hecho esa declaración y eso va a abrir la puerta para que en muchos congresos locales se pueda trabajar", expresó.»

    Todavía no lo podemos comprobar

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence
  3. The article

    «La diputada subrayó que, a nivel personal, no tiene una postura de rechazo, aunque reiteró que su responsabilidad es representar a su partido y al grupo parlamentario que encabeza.»

    Todavía no lo podemos comprobar

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence
  4. The article

    «Ya que estén de acuerdo con lo que dice el partido a nivel nacional, vamos a estar de acuerdo", afirmó.»

    Todavía no lo podemos comprobar

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence
  5. The article

    «Cabe recordar que el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo es legal en Aguascalientes desde 2019 y se realiza de manera directa en el Registro Civil sin necesidad de amparo, luego de que la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (SCJN) declarara inconstitucionales los artículos que lo limitaban.»

    Todavía no lo podemos comprobar

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Informe completo: VR-2026-6KMZK9 · PDF. Turing compara con lo que tenemos documentado (un conteo mínimo).

Who speaks

Quién habla en la nota

Las personas con cargo público y las otras voces que aparecen, y si están a favor o en contra de nuestros derechos.

Talk about this initiative

See a mistake?

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Un dato está mal

Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.

Avisar de un dato

Soy del medio

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Para saber más

Cómo se calculó el 100Lo que resta y lo que suma, la versión de Turing y si ayudó una IA

Se ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-GBUR-VE7P, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-GBUR-VE7P

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 10:10:06 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-GBUR-VE7P Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 10:10:06 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (done) Saved on November 11, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy on the Internet Archive (opens in another tab)
  5. 5. Monitoring (done) It was still online on November 12, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 11, 2026, 17:29 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy c57db334ef73a5bbe82317f8232dc4854a63fceeb468980930173a8ed18c01b7

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

En el Observatorio LegislativoLa iniciativa y las personas legisladoras que Turing relacionó con la nota

Legislative observatory

As this note speaks of an initiative and legislators, we automatically record it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Marriage equality and unions

The AI is busy right now. We will finish reviewing the article in the next review and the result will appear in the Legislative Observatory.

  • Bill · Aguascalientes

    Marriage and egalitarian cohabitation in the Civil Code

    The AI found that the note speaks to this initiative. The note already appears on your page.

    See the bill
  • Diputación federal · PAN

    Jorge Romero Herrera Por leer

    Turing todavía no termina de leer lo que dice: el resultado aparece aquí y en su ficha en cuanto la IA esté libre.

    See their record
  • Diputación local de Aguascalientes · PAN

    Alma Hilda Medina Macías Por leer

    Turing todavía no termina de leer lo que dice: el resultado aparece aquí y en su ficha en cuanto la IA esté libre.

    See their record

Other voices in the article

  • Parliamentary group

    Grupo Parlamentario del PAN en el Congreso de Aguascalientes Little interest Speaks respectfully

    “No es un tema de considerar ahorita”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill
  • Dirigencia de partido · Dirigente nacional

    Dirigencia Nacional del PAN In favor Speaks respectfully

    “¿Quién puede estar ya en contra de eso?”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

Note detailsMedio, fechas y versiones guardadas

Data

Byline
Sofía Galaviz NW Noticias Aguascalientes
Published
December 22, 2025
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 369 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.