Skip to content
Turing

Analysis of the article

Navarra registra cada año una quincena de delitos de odio movidos por la orientación sexual

Diario de Noticias de Navarra · published on November 10, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones. 3 expresiones aparecen citadas o denunciadas y no cuentan.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
November 10, 2026
Analyzed
November 11, 2026
State
Online
Leer en noticiasdenavarra.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

Diario de Noticias de Navarra noticiasdenavarra.com

By Enrique Conde ·

abc Quoted or analyzed (does not count) abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Navarra registra cada año una quincena de delitos de hatred movidos por la sexual orientation

En noviembre de 2025 el Tribunal Supremo dictó una interesante sentencia sobre los delitos de hatred movidos por la sexual orientation de las víctimas. En el transcurso de una cena en un asador de Cizur, dos mujeres estuvieron largo rato increpando a una pareja gay, comensales en la mesa de al lado, a …

… 2.100 y 1.500 euros, respectivamente. Sin embargo, el Supremo endureció las penas y estableció los requisitos para considerar un incidente de este tipo como delito de hatred. “Este incidente duró 15 minutos y los reiterados insultos y calificaciones discriminatorias supusieron un grave atentado a la dignidad del hombre, provocando que …

… autor o autores de los hechos. Y de esta forma también se va concretando una tipología delictiva cuyas infracciones van a más y que tienen una destacada presencia en la Comunidad Foral. Dos condenas recientes por agresiones homófobas en el entorno del cementerio En fechas recientes el Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Navarra también condenó a …

… por él por la noche para atemorizarlo en una zona de sobra conocida por practicarse cruising y donde personas homosexuales buscan encuentros. Lo insultaron al grito de faggot (slang), faggot (slang) y lo persiguieron con un vehículo. En otro episodio reciente, la Audiencia condenó en este caso a dos hombres, de 30 y 31 años, por denigrar también a un varón homosexual en el mismo entorno. Le tiraron la moto en el aparcamiento, le insultaron “puto faggot (slang) del mierda, te voy a matar, muérete, sois una plaga” y le dieron puñetazos y patadas. Les impusieron dos años de prisión a cada uno de ellos por una agresión evidentemente movida por la sexual orientation de la víctima. Navarra lidera la tasa estatal No cabe la impunidad en estos delitos, pero cierto es que no se logra frenar su tendencia al alza en Navarra. Como esta …

… el Casco Viejo y sufrieron importantes lesiones. Navarra de hecho lidera en el Estado desde hace varios ejercicios las infracciones penales e incidentes de delitos de hatred, puesto que encabeza la mayor tasa de delitos de hatred por cada 100.000 habitantes, al situarse en 15,6, según el informe de evolución de los delitos e incidentes de hatred en España 2025, elaborado por el Ministerio del Interior. Se denunciaron 107 infracciones e incidentes en Navarra por hatred, 13 de ellos relacionados con la sexual orientation y otros hasta 29 procedimientos, se incoaron por discriminación por sexo y género. En 2024 el total de delitos fue de 95, 14 de ellos por la sexual orientation, y el año anterior habían sido 6.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 98

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones. 3 expresiones aparecen citadas o denunciadas y no cuentan.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 3 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+6
  3. Only gives voice to the authorities−3
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−5
  5. Rating98

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities1 time
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • ExpertsNo

It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.

What the article quotes, denounces or attributes to other people

These expressions appear in textual quotations, as terms that the text examines or in words of other people that the note reports or points out as an offense. Naming them to report or denounce them is not using them, so they do not count in the rating.

  • Términos despectivos · en palabras de otros que se denuncia · 3 veces …cruising y donde personas homosexuales buscan encuentros. Lo insultaron al grito de faggot (slang), maricón y lo persiguieron con un vehículo. En otro episodio reciente, la Audiencia…
  • Términos despectivos · en una cita que se denuncia …homosexual en el mismo entorno. Le tiraron la moto en el aparcamiento, le insultaron “puto maricón del mierda, te voy a matar, muérete, sois una plaga” y le dieron puñetazos…
  • Discurso hostil · en una cita que se denuncia …le insultaron “puto maricón del mierda, te voy a matar, muérete, sois una plaga” y le dieron puñetazos y patadas. Les impusieron dos años de prisión a cada uno de…

What it does well

  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names discrimination
  • Gives context with data

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-ZK4H-4EJQ

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 10:20:10 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-ZK4H-4EJQ Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 10:20:10 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It could not be saved (some networks require logging in). Our sealed copy remains.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 11, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

archive.org could not save it

Some social networks require logging in and do not let archive.org save them. The copy is still backed by the digital fingerprint and third-party timestamps.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy aedeb26679ee243bc9bd124277158346c9522ba01b14e2ed58a1175cc07b9756

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Enrique Conde
Published
November 10, 2026
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Fuera de México

It is foreign press: we keep it for the statistics on LGBTTTIQANB+ people, but it is not a Memoria y Resistencia case.

Saved versions

  • 98Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 595 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.