Skip to content
Turing

Analysis of the article

El odio se dispara en Cantabria, casi todos los delitos por racismo y orientación sexual

eldiariocantabria.es · published on November 10, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

The article uses respectful language.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
November 10, 2026
Analyzed
November 11, 2026
State
Online
Leer en eldiariocantabria.publico.es PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

eldiariocantabria.es eldiariocantabria.publico.es

By J. Hernández ·

abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

The hatred se dispara en Cantabria, casi todos los delitos por racismo y sexual orientation

En un año, el hatred parece haberse disparado en Cantabria. Los delitos vinculados al color de piel, la sexualidad o la religión no solo han crecido, sino que han pasado de 22 a 34, lo que supone un 54,4 % más en 2025 respecto al año anterior. Y si miramos el detalle, casi todos son por racismo u sexual orientation. Más concretamente, el año pasado se registraron en community development. 19 delitos por racismo o xenofobia, y 10 por sexual orientation, lo que supone el 85,3 % del total. La suma, además, supera el total de delitos de hatred que se registraron en 2024. El resto han sido tres por discriminación por sexo y dos por religión. DELITOS QUE CUESTIONAN PRINCIPIOS FUNDAMENTALES Son datos que ha facilitado este martes la Delegación del Gobierno en Cantabria con motivo de la inauguración, por parte de su titular, Pedro Casares, de las 'Jornadas de Formación en Delitos de Odio. Proyecto TAHCLE' que desarrolla la Jefatura Superior de Policía de Cantabria y en la que agentes de cuerpos se forman frente a los delitos motivados por prejuicio y discriminación. Casares ha destacado el trabajo de la Policía Nacional frente a los delitos de hatred que cuestionan principios fundamentales como la igualdad, la libertad y la convivencia. El representante del Estado ha abierto las jornadas junto al fiscal superior de Cantabria, Jesús Arteaga, el jefe superior de Policía, Antonio del Amo, y la responsable de delitos de hatred en la Delegación y también jefe de la Unidad de Violencia sobre la Mujer, Diana Mirones. RESPUESTA ADECUADA Casares ha destacado la continuidad de estas jornadas en …

… y mujeres del cuerpo en Cantabria por estar cada vez más preparados y capacitados" para ofrecer "una respuesta adecuada ante los cada vez más frecuentes" delitos de hatred. Al respecto, ha destacado la importancia de trabajar de forma coordenada desde todas las instituciones en colaboración con las Fuerzas y Cuerpos de Seguridad del …

… ha reafirmado "el compromiso del Gobierno de España con la defensa de los derechos fundamentales, la igualdad y la lucha contra cualquier forma de discriminación. "The hatred no tiene cabida en una sociedad democrática como la nuestra. Combatirlo, prevenirlo y proteger a las víctimas es una tarea esencial para la Policía Nacional", ha …

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 2 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+4
  3. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

What it does well

  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names discrimination

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-JBKN-MD4W

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 10:20:08 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-JBKN-MD4W Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 10:20:08 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 11, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 11, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 11, 2026, 16:29 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 1729c987495584e1f1a66ed7ad084bb6b1d8484743e508f1f1eeb1136f9bc856

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
J. Hernández
Published
November 10, 2026
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 531 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.